Intracellular tension in periosteum/perichondrium cells regulates long bone growth

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 84-91

  Foolen, Jasper ^a   Van Donkelaar, Corrinus C ^a   Ito, Keita ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

actin cytoskeleton; cytochalasin; mechanobiology; substrate stiffness

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHALASIN D; GROWTH INHIBITOR;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; LONG BONE; MICROFILAMENT; MONITORING; NONHUMAN; PERICHONDRIUM; PERIOSTEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RIGIDITY; TENSION;

ANIMALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CELLS, CULTURED; CHICK EMBRYO; CULTURE MEDIA, CONDITIONED; PERIOSTEUM; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 78649613756     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21224     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Di Nino DL, Long F, Linsenmayer TF., 2001. Regulation of endochondral cartilage growth in the developing avian limb: Cooperative involvement of perichondrium and periosteum. Dev Biol 240: 433-442.
2. Alvarez J, Horton J, Sohn P, et al. 2001. The perichondrium plays an important role in mediating the effects of TGF-beta1 on endochondral bone formation. Dev Dyn 221: 311-321.
3. Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, et al. 1996. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273: 613-622.
4. Long F, Linsenmayer TF., 1998. Regulation of growth region cartilage proliferation and differentiation by perichondrium. Development 125: 1067-1073.
5. Hartmann C, Tabin CJ., 2000. Dual roles of Wnt signaling during chondrogenesis in the chicken limb. Development 127: 3141-3159.
6. Di Nino DL, Crochiere ML, Linsenmayer TF., 2002. Multiple mechanisms of perichondrial regulation of cartilage growth. Dev Dyn 225: 250-259.
7. Jenkins DH, Cheng DH, Hodgson AR., 1975. Stimulation of bone growth by periosteal stripping. A clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57: 482-484.
8. Chan KP, Hodgson AR., 1970. Physiologic leg lengthening. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 68: 55-62.
9. Wilde GP, Baker GC., 1987. Circumferential periosteal release in the treatment of children with leg-length inequality. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69: 817-821.
10. Moss ML., 1972. The regulation of skeletal growth. In:, Gross R, editor. The regulation of organ and tissue growth. New York: Academic Press; p 127-142.
11. Foolen J, van Donkelaar CC, Nowlan N, et al. 2008. Collagen orientation in periosteum and perichondrium is aligned with preferential directions of tissue growth. J Orthop Res 26: 1263-1268.
12. Foolen J, van Donkelaar CC, Murphy P, et al. 2009. Residual periosteum tension is insufficient to directly modulate bone growth. J Biomech 42: 152-157.
13. Bertram JE, Polevoy Y, Cullinane DM., 1998. Mechanics of avian fibrous periosteum: Tensile and adhesion properties during growth. Bone 22: 669-675.
14. Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang YL., 2000. Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279: C1345-C1350.
15. Lo CM, Wang HB, Dembo M, et al. 2000. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 79: 144-152.
16. Boonen KJ, Rosaria-Chak KY, Baaijens FP, et al. 2009. Essential environmental cues from the satellite cell niche: Optimizing proliferation and differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296: C1338-C1345.
17. Cox MA, Gawlitta D, Driessen NJ, et al. 2008. The non-linear mechanical properties of soft engineered biological tissues determined by finite spherical indentation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 11: 585-592.
18. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126: 677-689.
19. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL., 1992. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev Dyn 195: 231-272.
20. Lovitch D, Christianson ML., 1997. Mineralization is more reliable in periosteum explants from size-selected chicken embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 33: 234-235.
21. Chan CE, Odde DJ., 2008. Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates. Science 322: 1687-1691.
22. Saez A, Ghibaudo M, Buguin A, et al. 2007. Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 8281-8286.
23. Mitrossilis D, Fouchard J, Guiroy A, et al. 2009. Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 18243-18248.
24. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL., 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139-1143.
25. Pelham RJ Jr, Wang Y., 1997. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 13661-13665.
26. Goffin JM, Pittet P, Csucs G, et al. 2006. Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of alpha-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers. J Cell Biol 172: 259-268.
27. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, et al. 2004. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 86: 617-628.
28. Schwarz US, Bischofs IB., 2005. Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media. Med Eng Phys 27: 763-772.
29. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, et al. 2005. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 60: 24-34.
30. Lee EY, Parry G, Bissell MJ., 1984. Modulation of secreted proteins of mouse mammary epithelial cells by the collagenous substrata. J Cell Biol 98: 146-155.
31. Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C., 1979. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 1274-1278.
32. Guidry C, Grinnell F., 1985. Studies on the mechanism of hydrated collagen gel reorganization by human skin fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 79: 67-81.
33. Guidry C, Grinnell F., 1987. Contraction of hydrated collagen gels by fibroblasts: Evidence for two mechanisms by which collagen fibrils are stabilized. Coll Relat Res 6: 515-529.
34. Tomasek JJ, Hay ED., 1984. Analysis of the role of microfilaments and microtubules in acquisition of bipolarity and elongation of fibroblasts in hydrated collagen gels. J Cell Biol 99: 536-549.
35. Chen CS., 2008. Mechanotransduction-A field pulling together ? J Cell Sci 121: 3285-3292.
36. Maley MA, Davies MJ, Grounds MD., 1995. Extracellular matrix, growth factors, genetics: Their influence on cell proliferation and myotube formation in primary cultures of adult mouse skeletal muscle. Exp Cell Res 219: 169-179.
37. Macfelda K, Kapeller B, Wilbacher I, et al. 2007. Behavior of cardiomyocytes and skeletal muscle cells on different extracellular matrix components-Relevance for cardiac tissue engineering. Artif Organs 31: 4-12.