Multiscale mechanobiology of de novo bone generation, remodeling and adaptation of autograft in a common ovine femur model

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 829-840

  Knothe Tate, Melissa L ^a,b   Dolejs, Scott ^b   McBride, Sarah H ^b   Matthew Miller, R ^b   Knothe, Ulf R ^c  

^a Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^b Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone graft; Bone healing; Critical sized defect; Multiscale mechanobiology; Periosteum; Progenitor or stem cell; Tissue engineering; Tissue generation and adaptation

Indexed keywords

BONE GRAFT; BONE HEALING; CRITICAL SIZED DEFECT; MULTISCALES; PERIOSTEUM; PROGENITOR OR STEM CELL; TISSUE GENERATION AND ADAPTATION;

GRAFTS; MECHANICS; NAILS; STEM CELLS; SURGERY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BONE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEFECT; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE GRAFT; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; FEMALE; FEMUR; HEALING; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; NONHUMAN; PERIOSTEUM; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULARIZATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGY; BONE REMODELING; ENGINEERING; FEMUR; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSTEOGENESIS; SHEEP; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 79956371029     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Allen M.R., Burr D.B. Human femoral neck has less cellular periosteum, and more mineralized periosteum, than femoral diaphyseal bone. Bone 2005, 36:311-316.
2. Allen M.R., Hock J.M., Burr D.B. Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004, 35:1003-1012.
3. Bhole A.P., Flynn B.P., Liles M., Saeidi N., Dimarzio C.A., Ruberti J.W. Mechanical strain enhances survivability of collagen micronetworks in the presence of collagenase: implications for load-bearing matrix growth and stability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A. 2009, 367:3339-3362.
4. Brookes M., Revell W. Blood supply of bone. Scientific Aspects 1998, 109-141. Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. Burstein F., Canalis R. Studies on the osteogenic potential of vascularized periosteum: behavior of periosteal flaps transferred onto soft tissues. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1985, 93:731-735.
6. Camilli J., Penteado C. Bone formation by vascularized periosteal and osteoperiosteal grafts. An experimental study in rats. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 1994, 114:18-24.
7. Chang, H., Zimmermann, J., Knothe Tate, M.L., 2010. Mechanical adaptation of embryonic stem cells. In: Proc. 56th Ann. Mtg of the Orthop. Res. Soc., 0722.
8. Cullen D.M., Smith R.T., Akhter M.P. Time course for bone formation with long-term external mechanical loading. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 88:1943-1948.
9. Eyre-Brook A. The Periosteum: its function reassessed. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 1984, 189:300-307.
10. Forwood M.R., Bennett M.B., Blowers A.R., Nadorfi R.L. Modification of the in vivo four-point loading model for studying mechanically induced bone adaptation. Bone 1998, 23:307-310.
11. Hertel, R., Knothe, U., Gerber, A., Cordey, J., Rahn, R., 1997. The osteogenic potential of vascularized periosteum and cancellous bone graft in sheep. Trans. Orthopaedic Research Society.
12. Jones D.B., Nolte H., Scholübbers J.G., Turner E., Veltel D. Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 1991, 12:101-110.
13. Jupiter J.B., Gerhard H.J., Guerrero J., Nunley J.A., Levin L.S. Treatment of segmental defects of the radius with use of the vascularized osteoseptocutaneous fibular autogenous graft. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1997, 79:542-550.
14. Kanno T., Takahashi T., Ariyoshi W., Tsujisawa T., Haga M., Nishihara T. Tensile mechanical strain up-regulates Runx2 and osteogenic factor expression in human periosteal cells: implications for distraction osteogenesis. J. Oral Maxillo. Surg. 2005, 63:499-504.
15. Klaue, K., Knothe, U., Anton, C., Masquelet, A.C., Perren, S.M., 1998. Biological implementation of autologous foreign body membranes in corticalization of massive cancellous bone grafts. Trans. Orthopaedic Trauma Association.
16. Klaue K., Knothe U., Anton C., Pfluger D.H., Stoddart M., Masquelet A.C., Perren S.M. Bone regeneration in long-bone defects: tissue compartmentalisation? In vivo study on bone defects in sheep. Injury 2009, 40(Suppl 4). S95-S102.
17. Knothe U.R., Dolejs S., Miller R.M., Knothe Tate M.L. Effects of mechanical loading patterns, bone graft, and proximity to periosteum on bone defect. J. Biomechanics 2010, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.026.
18. Knothe U., Springfield D.S.S. A novel surgical procedure for bridging of massive bone defects. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2005, 3(1):7. http://www.wjso.com/content/3/1/7.
19. Knothe Tate M.L. Top down and bottom up engineering of bone. J. Biomechanics 2011, 44(2):304-312.
20. Knothe Tate M.L. Whither flows the fluid in bone?: An Osteocyte's Perspective. J. Biomechanics 2003, 36(10):1409-1424.
21. Knothe Tate, M.L., Knothe, U., 2010. Mechanoactive sheets for surgical reconstruction procedures, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Provisional Patent Application No. 61311056.
22. Knothe Tate M.L., Chang H., Knothe U.R. Periosteal bone regeneration in a critical sized long bone defect: role of vectorial transport, collagen, periosteal cells and blood supply. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2010, 35:0384.
23. Knothe Tate M.L., Dolejs S., Miller R.M., Knothe U.R. Role of mechanical loading in healing of massive bone autografts. J. Orth. Res. 2010, 28:1657-1664. 10.1002/jor.21190.
24. Knothe Tate M.L., Falls T., McBride S.H., Atit R., Knothe U.R. Mechanical modulation of osteochondroprogenitor cell fate. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Bio. 2008, 40:2720-2738.
25. Knothe Tate M.L., Ritzman T., Schneider E., Knothe U. Testing of a new one-stage bone-transport surgical procedure exploiting the periosteum and bone transport for repair of long bone defects. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 2007, 89:307-316.
26. Knothe Tate M.L., Steck R., Forwood M.R., Niederer P. In vivo demonstration of load-induced fluid flow in the rat tibia and its potential implications for processes associated with functional adaptation. J. Exp. Bio. 2000, 203:2737-2745.
27. Lieberman D.E., Polk J.D., Demes B. Predicting Long Bone Loading From Cross-sectional Geometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2004, 123:156-171.
28. Liu J., Wang D., Cheng H. Experimental study of the osteogenic capacity of periosteal allografts: a preliminary report. Microsurgery 1994, 15:87-92.
29. Liu J., Wang D., Cheng H. Use of revascularized periosteal allografts for repairing bony defects: an experimental study. Microsurgery 1994, 15:93-97.
30. Matter P. History of the AO and its global effect on operative fracture treatment. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998, 347:11-18.
31. McBride, S.H., Dolejs, S., Brianza, S., Knothe, U., Knothe Tate, M.L., 2011a. Net change in periosteal strain during stance shift loading after surgery correlates to rapid de novo bone generation in critically sized defects. Ann. Biomed. Eng. PMID:21271290. doi:10.1007/s10439-010-0242-9.
32. McBride S.H., Dolejs S., Knothe U., Knothe Tate M.L. Major and minor centroidal axes serve as objective, automatable reference points to test mechanobiological hypotheses using histomorphometry. J. Biomechanics 2011, 44(6):1205-1208.
33. McBride S.H., Evans S.F., Knothe Tate M.L. The material properties of ovine femoral periosteum. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2011, 36:2212.
34. McBride S.H., Evans S.F., Knothe Tate M.L. Does cryopreservation degrade the Young's Modulus of the periosteum?. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2011, 36:2214.
35. McBride S.H., Knothe Tate M.L. Modulation of stem cell shape and fate, a: role of density and seeding protocol on nucleus shape and gene expression. Tissue Eng. 2008, 14:1561-1572.
36. McBride S.H., Falls T., Knothe Tate M.L. Modulation of stem cell shape and fate, B: Mechanical modulation of cell shape and gene expression. Tissue Eng. 2008, 14:1573-1580.
37. Miller R.M., McBride S.H., Dolejs S., Knothe U., Knothe Tate M.L. Modeling the mechanobiology of the periosteum to predict and harness its regenerative capacity. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2011, 36:2213.
38. Miric D., Bumbasirevic M., Radulovic N., Lesic A. External fixation of war injuries of the proximal femur. Acta. Chir. Jugosl. 2005, 52:101-105.
39. Moore S., Knothe U., Knothe Tate M.L. Elucidation of cellular mechanisms underlying efficacy of a periosteal replacement implant. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2011, 36:1454.
40. Munro M., Piekarski K. A solid/liquid composite. Composites 1976, 7:195-199.
41. Nakahara H., Bruder S.P., Goldberg V.M., Caplan A.I. In vivo osteochondrogenic potential of cultured cells derived from the periosteum. Clin. Orthopaedics Rel. Res. 1990, 259:223-232.
42. Nishimura T., Simmons D., Mainous E. The origin of bone formed by heterotopic periosteal autografts. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997, 55:1265-1268.
43. Piekarski K., Munro M. Transport mechanism operating between blood supply and osteocytes in long bones. Nature 1977, 269:80-82.
44. Puckett C.L., Hurvitz J.S., Metzler M.H., Silver D. Bone formation by revascularized periosteal and bone grafts, compared with traditional bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1979, 64:361-365.
45. Raab-Cullen D.M., Akhter M.P., Kimmel D.B., Recker R.R. Periosteal bone formation stimulated by externally induced bending strains. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1994, 9:1143-1152.
46. Romana M., Masquelet A. Vascularized periosteum associated with cancellous bone graft: an experimental study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1990, 85:587-592.
47. Ruedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG. AO Principles of Fracture Management 2000, AO Publishing.
48. Song, M.J., Dean, D., Knothe Tate, M.L., 2010. In situ spatiotemporal mapping of flow fields around seeded stem cells at the subcellular length scale. PLoS ONE 5, e12796.
49. Steck R., Gatzka C., Schneider E., Niederer P., Knothe Tate M.L. Measurement of bone surface strainson the sheep metacarpus in vivo and ex vivo "etal. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2003, 1/2003:1-6.
50. Takato T., Harii K., Nakatsuka T. Osteogenic capacity of vascularized periosteum: experimental study using rib periosteum in rabbits. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1988, 41:528-532.
51. Takushima A., Kitano Y., Harii K. Osteogenicpotentioal of cultured periosteal cells in a distracted bone gap in rabbits. J. Surg. Res. 1998, 78:68-77.
52. Thomas T.T. Progress of Medical Science. Surgery. Regarding some points about bone grafts by Wheeler. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1919, 158:887-888.
53. Thomson R.C., Mikos A.G., Beahm E., Lemon J.C., Satterfield W.C., Aufdemorte T.B., Miller M.J. Guided tissue fabrication from periosteum using preformed biodegradable polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 1999, 20:2007-2018.
54. Turner C.H., Forwood M.R. On animal models for studying bone adaptation. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1994, 55:316-317.
55. Uddstromer L. The osteogenic capacity of tubular and membranous bone periosteum. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1978, 12:195-205.
56. Uddstromer L., Ritsila V. Osteogenic capacity of periosteal grafts. Scand J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1978, 12:207-214.
57. Ueno T., Kagawa T., Ishida N., Fukunaga J., Mizukawa N., Sugahara T., Yamamoto T. Prefabricated bone graft induced from grafted periosteum for the repair of jaw defects: and experimental study in rabbits. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2001, 29:219-223.
58. Ueno T., Kagawa T., Mizukawa N., Nakamura H., Sugahara T., Yamamoto T. Cellular origin of endochondral ossification from grafted periosteum. Anat. Rec. 2001, 264:348-357.
59. Vögelin E., Jones N.F., Rao U.N. Long-term viability of articular cartilage after microsurgical whole-joint transplantation and immunosuppression with rapamycin, mycophenolatemofetil, and tacrolimus. J. Hand Surg. Am. 2002, 27:307-315.
60. Wheeler W.I.D.C. Some points about bone grafts. Br. Med. J. 1919, 1(3031):119-120.
61. Yu M., Knothe U., Knothe Tate M.L. Regeneration of periosteum in denuded bone. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2011, 36:1453.