Advertisement Call Variation in the Golden Rocket Frog (Anomaloglossus beebei): Evidence for Individual Distinctiveness

Ethology

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 244-256

  Pettitt, Beth A ^a   Bourne, Godfrey R ^b   Bee, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACOUSTICS; FROG; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; RECONSTRUCTION; SIGNAL; VOCALIZATION;

EID: 84873965594     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12058     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bee, M. A. 2004: Within-individual variation in bullfrog vocalizations: implications for a vocally mediated social recognition system. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 116, 3770-3781.
2. Bee, M. A. 2006: Individual recognition in animal species. In: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. (Naguib, M., ed.). Elsevier, New York. pp. 617-626.
3. Bee, M. A. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2001a: Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1129-1140.
4. Bee, M. A. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2001b: Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1141-1150.
5. Bee, M. A. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2001c: Habituation as a mechanism of reduced aggression between adjacently territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). J. Comp. Psych. 115, 307-316.
6. Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2001: Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination. Ethology 107, 65-84.
7. Bee, M. A., Cook, J. M., Love, E. K., O'Bryan, L. R., Pettitt, B. A., Schrode, K. & Vélez, A. 2010: Assessing acoustic signal variability and the potential for sexual selection and social recognition in Boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata). Ethology 116, 564-576.
8. Bee, M. A., Schwartz, J. J. & Summers, K. 2013a: All's well that begins Wells: celebrating 60 years of Animal Behaviour and 36 years of research on anuran social behaviour. Anim. Behav. 85, 5-18.
9. Bee, M. A., Suyesh, R. & Biju, S. D. 2013b: The vocal repertoire of Pseudophilautus kani, a shrub frog (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats of India. Bioacoustics, in press.
10. Beecher, M. D. 1982: Signature systems and kin recognition. Amer. Zool. 22, 477-490.
11. Beecher, M. D. 1989: Signaling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach. Anim. Behav. 38, 248-261.
12. Blumstein, D. T. & Muños, O. 2005: Individual, age and sex-specific information is contained in yellow-bellied marmot alarm calls. Anim. Behav. 69, 353-361.
13. Boake, C. R. B. 1989: Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol. Ecol. 3, 173-182.
14. Bourne, G. R., Collins, A. C., Holder, A. M. & McCarthy, C. L. 2001: Vocal communication and reproductive behavior of the frog Colostethus beebei in Guyana. J. Herpetol. 34, 272-281.
15. Briggs, V. S. 2010: Call trait variation in Morelett's tree frog, Agalychnis moreletii, of Belize. Herpetologica 66, 241-249.
16. Castellano, S. & Giacoma, C. 1998: Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toads. Anim. Behav. 56, 275-287.
17. Charlton, B. D., Ellis, W. A. H., McKinnon, A. J., Brumm, J., Nilsson, K. & Fitch, W. T. 2011: Perception of male caller identity in koalas (Phascolaractos cinereus): acoustic analysis and playback experiments. PLoS ONE 6, 1-8.
18. Charrier, I. & Harcourt, R. G. 2006: Individual vocal identity in mother and pup Australian sea lion Neophoca cinerea. J. Mamm. 87, 929-938.
19. Charrier, I., Pitcher, B. J. & Harcourt, R. G. 2009: Vocal recognition of mothers by Australian sea lion pups: individual signature and environmental constraints. Anim. Behav. 78, 1127-1134.
20. Clark, J. A. & Leung, J. 2011: Vocal distinctiveness and information coding in a suboscine with multiple song types: Eastern wood-pewee. Wilson J. Ornithol. 123, 835-840.
21. Davis, M. S. 1987: Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 185-190.
22. Falconer, D. S. 1981: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed. Longman, New York.
23. Falls, J. B. 1982: Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H., eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 237-278.
24. Feng, A. S., Riede, T., Arch, V. S., Yu, Z. L., Xu, Z. M., Yu, X. J. & Shen, J. X. 2009: Diversity of the vocal signals of concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota): evidence for individual signatures. Ethology 115, 1015-1028.
25. Friedl, T. W. P. & Klump, G. M. 2002: The vocal behaviour of male European treefrogs (Hyla arborea): implications for inter- and intrasexual selection. Behaviour 139, 113-136.
26. Gasser, H., Amézquita, A. & Hödl, W. 2009: Who is calling? Intraspecific call variation in the Aromobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Ethology 115, 596-607.
27. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991: Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42, 615-635.
28. Gerhardt, H. C. & Bee, M. A. 2007: Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals. In: Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research vol. 28 (Narins, P. M., Feng, A. S., Fay, R. R. & Popper, A. N., eds). Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 113-146.
29. Gerhardt, H. C. & Doherty, J. A. 1988: Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications. J. Comp. Physiol. 162, 261-278.
30. Gerhardt, H. C. & Huber, F. 2002: Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
31. Gerhardt, H. C., Dyson, M. L. & Tanner, S. D. 1996: Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray treefrogs: patterns of variability and female choice. Behav. Ecol. 7, 7-18.
32. Grilliam, J., Charrier, I. & Harcourt, R. G. 2008: Vocal identity and species recognition in male Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2288-2295.
33. Howard, R. D. & Young, J. R. 1998: Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Anim. Behav. 55, 1165-1179.
34. Jones, D. L. & Ratnam, R. 2009: Blind location and separation of callers in a natural chorus using a microphone array. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 895-910.
35. Kok, P. J. R. 2008: Anomaloglossus beebei. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. .
36. Kok, P. J. R., Sambhu, H., Roopsind, I., Lenglet, G. L. & Bourne, G. R. 2006: A new species of Colostethus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) with maternal care from Kaieteur National Park, Guyana. Zootaxa 1238, 35-61.
37. Lannoo, M. J. 2005: Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
38. Lein, M. R. 2008: Song variation in buff-breasted flycatchers (Empidonax fulvifrons). Wilson J Ornithol 120, 256-267.
39. Lessells, C. M. & Boag, P. T. 1987: Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104, 116-121.
40. Loftus-Hills, J. J. & Littlejohn, M. J. 1971: Pulse repetition rate as the basis for mating call discrimination by two sympatric species of Hyla. Copeia 1971, 154-156.
41. Noor, M. A. F. 1999: Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83, 503-508.
42. Pettitt, B. A., Bourne, G. R. & Bee, M. A. 2012: Quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 4811-4820.
43. Pfennig, K. S. 2000: Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol. 11, 220-227.
44. Platz, J. E. & Forester, D. C. 1988: Geographic variation in mating call among the four subspecies of the chorus frog: Pseudacris triseriata (Wied). Copeia 1988, 1062-1066.
45. Pröhl, H. 2003: Variation in male calling behavior and relation to male mating success in the strawberry poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology 109, 273-290.
46. Reers, H., Jacot, A. & Forstmeier, W. 2011: Do zebra finch parents fail to recognize their own offspring? PLoS ONE 6, 1-7.
47. Ryan, M. J. 2001: Anuran Communication. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC.
48. Ryan, M. J. & Keddy-Hector, A. 1992: Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139, S4-S35.
49. Schul, J. & Bush, S. L. 2002: Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1847-1852.
50. Schwartz, J. J. 1987: The importance of spectral and temporal properties in species and call recognition in a neotropical treefrog with a complex vocal repertoire. Anim. Behav. 35, 340-347.
51. Semlitsch, R. D. 2003: Amphibian Conservation. Smithsonian, Washington, DC.
52. Shaw, K. L. & Herlihy, D. P. 2000: Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 267, 577-584.
53. Sheehan, M. J. & Tibbetts, E. A. 2011: Specialized face learning is associated with individual recognition in paper wasps. Science 334, 1272-1275.
54. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1981: Biometry (2nd edition). W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California.
55. Straughan, I. R. 1975: An analysis of the mechanism of mating call discrimination in the frogs Hyla regilla and H. cadaverina. Copeia 1975, 415-424.
56. Tárano, Z. 2001: Variation in male advertisement calls in the Neotropical frog Physalaemus enesefae. Copeia 2001, 1064-1072.
57. Temeles, E. J. 1994: The role of neighbors in territorial systems - when are they dear enemies? Anim. Behav. 47, 339-350.
58. Terry, A. M. R., Peake, T. M. & McGregor, P. K. 2005: The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front. Zool. 2, 10.
59. Titus, K., Mosher, J. A. & Williams, B. K. 1984: Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant-analysis: ecological applications. Am. Midl. Nat. 111, 1-7.
60. Tripp, T. M. & Otter, K. A. 2006: Vocal individuality as a potential long-term monitoring tool for Western Screech-owls, Megascops kennicottii. Can. J. Zool. 84, 744-753.
61. Vannoni, E. & McElligott, A. G. 2007: Individual acoustic variation in fallow deer (Dama dama) common and harsh groans: a source-filter theory perspective. Ethology 113, 223-234.
62. Wells, K. D. 1977: The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim. Behav. 25, 666-693.
63. Wells, K. D. 2001: The energetic of calling in frogs. In: Anuran Communication (Ryan, M. J., ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 45-60.
64. Zakon, H. H. & Wilczynski, W. 1988: The physiology of the anuran eighth nerve. In: The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System (Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M. J. & Wilczynski, W., eds). Wiley, New York, pp. 125-155.