Diversity of the vocal signals of concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota): Evidence for individual signatures

Ethology

Volumn 115, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1015-1028

  Feng, Albert S ^a   Riede, Tobias ^b   Arch, Victoria S ^c   Yu, Zulin ^d   Xu, Zhi Min ^d   Yu, Xin Jian ^e   Shen, Jun Xian ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^e Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FIELD SURVEY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FROG; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL; TRADE-OFF; ULTRASONICS; VOCALIZATION;

ANURA; ODORRANA;

EID: 70350006690     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01692.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Beckers, G. J. L. ten Cate, C. 2006 : Nonlinear phenomena and song evolution in Streptopelia doves. Acta Zool. Sin. 52, 482 485.
2. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001a : Neighbor-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). I. Acoustic basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1129 1140.
3. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001b : Neighbor-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). II. Perceptual basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1141 1150.
4. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001c : Habituation as a mechanism of reduced aggression between neighboring territorial male bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. J. Comp. Psychol. 115, 68 82.
5. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2002 : Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1443 1448.
6. Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001 : Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: Implications for individual discrimination. Ethology 107, 65 84.
7. Blumstein, D. T. Muños, O. 2005 : Individual, age and sex-specific information is contained in yellow-bellied marmot alarm calls. Anim. Behav. 69, 353 361.
8. Boersma, P. Weenick, D. 2008 : Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.38) [Computer program]. Retrieved August, 2008 from http://www.praat.org.
9. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Ludwig, T. A. Narins, P. M. 2002 : Call diversity in an Old World treefrog: level dependence and latency of acoustic responses. Bioacoustics 13, 21 35.
10. Davis, M. S. 1987 : Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 185 190.
11. Fant, G. 1960 : Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton, The Hague.
12. Fee, M. S., Shraiman, B., Pesaran, B. Mitra, P. P. 1998 : The role of nonlinear dynamics of the syrinx in the vocalizations of a songbird. Nature 395, 67 71.
13. Feng, A. S., Narins, P. M. Xu, C. H. 2002 : Vocal acrobatics in a Chinese frog, Amolops tormotus. Naturwissen 89, 352 356.
14. Feng, A. S., Narins, P. M., Xu, C. H., Lin, W. Y., Yu, Z. L., Qiu, Q., Xu, Z. M. Shen, J. X. 2006 : Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature 440, 333 336.
15. Feng, A. S., Arch, V. S., Yu, Z., Yu, X.-J., Xu, Z.-M. Shen, J.-X. 2009 : Neighbor-stranger discrimination in concave-eared torrent frogs, Odorrana tormota. Ethology, 115, 851 856.
16. Fischer, J., Hammerschmidt, K., Cheney, D. L. Seyfarth, R. M. 2002 : Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: Influences of context, age, and individuality. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1465 1474.
17. Fitch, W. T., Neubauer, J. Herzel, H. 2002 : Calls out of chaos: The adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim. Behav. 63, 407 418.
18. Gasser, H., Amezquita, A. Hodl, W. 2009 : Who is calling? Intraspecific call variation in the Aromobatid Frog, Allobates femoralis. Ethology 115, 596 607.
19. Gerhardt, H. C. 1975 : Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads. J. Comp. Physiol. 102, 1 12. 1978 : Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Science 199, 992 994.
20. Gerhardt, H. C. Bee, M. A. 2007 : Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals. In : Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research vol. 28 (Narins, P.M., Feng, A.S., Fay, R.R Popper, A.N., eds). Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 113 146.
21. Gerhardt, H. C. Huber, F. 2002 : Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Gridi-Papp, M. 2008 : The structure of vocal sounds produced with the mouth closed or with the mouth open in treefrogs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 2895 2902.
23. Grilliam, J., Charrier, I. Harcourt, R. G. 2008 : Vocal identity and species recognition in male Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2288 2295.
24. Herzel, H. 1993 : Bifurcations and chaos in voice signals. Mech. Rev. 46, 399 413.
25. Herzel, H., Berry, D., Titze, I. R. Saleh, M. 1994 : Analysis of vocal disorders with methods from nonlinear dynamics. J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 1008 1019.
26. Kelley, D. B. 2004 : Vocal communication in frogs. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 751 757.
27. Mende, W., Herzel, H. Wermke, K. 1990 : Bifurcations and chaos in newborn infant cries. Phys. Lett. A145, 418 424.
28. Narins, P. M., Lewis, E. R. McClelland, B. E. 2000 : Hyperextended call note repertoire of the endemic Madasgascar treefrog Boophis madagascariensis (Rhacophoridae). J. Zool. Lond. 250, 283 298.
29. Narins, P. M., Feng, A. S., Lin, W. Y., Schnitzler, H. U., Denzinger, A., Suthers, R. A. Xu, C. H. 2004 : Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 910 913.
30. O'Shea, T. J. Poche, L. B. 2006 : Aspects of underwater sound communication in Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). J. Mammal. 87, 1061 1071.
31. Owren, M. J. Rendall, D. 2001 : Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling. Evol. Anthropol. 10, 58 71.
32. Peters, G., East, M. L., Herzel, H., Henschel, J. R., Mills, M. G. L., Wilhelm, K. Hofer, H. 2004 : Spotted hyaena whoops: Frequent incidence of vocal instabilities in a mammalian loud call. Bioacoustics 14, 99 109.
33. Rand, A. S. Dudley, R. 1993 : Frogs in helium: the anuran vocal sac is not a cavity resonator. Physiol. Zool. 66, 793 806.
34. Riede, T. 1997 : Individual differences in the vocalization of Japanese macaque infants (Macaca fuscata). Primate Report, 47, 31 47.
35. Riede, T., Wilden, I. Tembrock, G. 1997 : Subharmonics, biphonations, and frequency jumps-common components of mammalian vocalization or indicators for disorders? Z. Säugetierkd. 62 (Suppl. II 198 203.
36. Riede, T., Herzel, H., Mehwald, D., Seidner, W., Trumler, E., Boehme, G. Tembrock, G. 2000 : Nonlinear phenomena in the natural howling of a dog-wolf mix. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1435 1442.
37. Riede, T., Owen, M. J. Arcadi, A. C. 2004 : Nonlinear acoustics in pan hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Frequency jumps, subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos. Am. J. Primatol. 64, 277 291.
38. Riede, T., Arcadi, A. C. Owren, M. J. 2007 : Nonlinear acoustics in pant hoots and screams of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Vocalizing at the edge. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1758 1767.
39. Ryan, M. J. 2001 : Anuran Communication. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC.
40. Shen, J. X., Feng, A. S., Xu, Z. M., Yu, Z. L., Arch, V. S., Yu, X. J. Narins, P. M. 2008 : Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls. Nature 453, 914 916.
41. Solow, A. R. 1990 : A randomization test for misclassification probability in discriminant analysis. Ecology 71, 2379 2382.
42. Suthers, R. A., Narins, P. M., Lin, W. Y., Schnitzler, H. U., Denzinger, A., Xu, C. H. Feng, A. S. 2006 : Voices of the dead: Complex nonlinear vocal signals from the larynx of an ultrasonic frog. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 4984 4993.
43. Titus, K., Mocher, J. A. Williams, B. K. 1984 : Chance-corrected classification for the use in discriminant analysis: Ecological applications. Am. Midl. Nat. 111, 1 7.
44. Titze, I. R., Riede, T. Popolo, P. 2008 : Nonlinear source-filter coupling in phonation: Vocal exercises. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1902 1915.
45. Tokuda, I. T., Riede, T., Neubauer, J., Owren, M. J. Herzel, H. 2002 : Nonlinear analysis of irregular animal vocalizations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2908 2919.
46. Volodina, E. V., Volodkin, I. A., Isaeva, I. V. Unck, C. 2006 : Biphonation may function to enhance individual recognition in the dohle, Cuon alpinus. Ethology 112, 815 825.
47. Wells, K. D. Schwartz, J. J. 2007 : The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication. In : Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research vol. 28 (Narins, P.M., Feng, A.S., Fay, R.R. Popper, A.N., eds). Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 44 86.
48. Wilden, I., Herzel, H., Peters, G. Tembrock, G. 1998 : Subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics 9, 171 196.
49. Woods, C. M. C. Martin-Smith, K. M. 2004 : Visible implant fluorescent elastomer tagging of the big-bellied seahorse, Hippocampus abdominalis. Fish. Res. 66, 363 371.
50. Zimmermann, E. Lerch, C. 1993 : The complex acoustic design of an advertisement call in male mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus, Prosimii, Primates) and sources of its variation. Ethology 93, 211 224.
51. Zollinger, S. A., Riede, T. Suthers, R. A. 2008 : Two-voice complexity from a single side of the syrinx in northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos vocalizations. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1978 1991.