Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2613-2620

  Olson, K M ^a   VanRaden, P M ^b   Tooker, M E ^b   Cooper, T A ^b  

^a National Association of Animal Breeders   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dairy cattle; Genomic; Prediction; Validation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; GENOME; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 79955121390     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3877     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Amer P.R., Banos G. Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:3320-3330.
2. Guo G., Lund M.S., Zhang Y., Su G. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2010, 127:423-432.
3. Interbull.2008. Description of National Genetic Evaluation Systems for dairy cattle traits as applied in different Interbull member countries. Accessed June 2010. http://www-interbull.slu.se/national_ges_info2/framesida-ges.htm.
4. Interbull. 2010. Interbull validation test for Genomic evaluations-GEBV test. 2010. Accessed August 10, 2010. http://www.interbull.org/images/stories/GEBV_validationtest_June2010.pdf.
5. Luan T., Woolliams J.A., Lien S., Kent M., Svendsen M., Meuwissen T.H.E. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian Red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics 2009, 183:1119-1126.
6. Lund, M. S., A. P. W. de Roos, A. G. de Vries, T. Druet, V. Ducrocq, S. Fritz, F. Guillaume, B. Guldbrandtsen, Z. Liu, R. Reents, C. Schrooten, M. Seefried, and G. Su. 2010. Improving genomic prediction by EuroGenomics collaboration. Commun. No. 880 in Proc. 9th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Leipzig, Germany. Gesellschaft für Tierzuchtwissenschaften e.V., Gießen, Germany.
7. Mäntysaari, E., Z. Liu, and P. VanRaden. 2010. Interbull validation test for genomic evaluations. Interbull Bull. 41:5 pages. Accessed March 3, 2011. http://www.interbull.org/images/stories/Mntysaari.pdf.
8. Norman H.D., Wright J.R., Powell R.L., VanRaden P.M., Miglior F., de Jong G. Consistency of maturity rate for milk yield across countries and generations. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:3937-3944.
9. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
10. VanRaden, P. M., J. B. Cole, M. E. Tooker, and T. A. Cooper. 2009a. Genetic base changes for January 2010. AIPL Res. Rep. BASE2 (8-09). Accessed September 5, 2010. http://aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/base2010.htm.
11. VanRaden, P. M., and M. E. Tooker. 2010. Revised geneomic evaluation methods. Changes to Evaluation System (January 2010). Accessed September 5, 2010. http://aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/changes/eval1001.html.
12. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
13. Wiggans G.R., Cooper T.A., VanRaden P.M. Cow adjustments for genomic predictions of Holstein and Jersey bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93(E-Suppl. 1):533-534. (Abstr.).
14. Wiggans G.R., VanRaden P.M., Bacheller L.R., Tooker M.E., Hutchison J.L., Cooper T.A., Sonstegard T.S. Selection and management of DNA markers for use in genomic evaluations. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:2287-2292.