Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle

BMC Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Rolf, Megan M ^a   Taylor, Jeremy F ^a   Schnabel, Robert D ^a   McKay, Stephanie D ^a   McClure, Matthew C ^a   Northcutt, Sally L ^b   Kerley, Monty S ^a   Weaber, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b American Angus Association   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BREEDING; BULLOCK; CATTLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING; FOOD INTAKE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PATERNALISM; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; EVALUATION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETICS; MALE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 77950961027     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-24     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Henderson CR. Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 1975, 31:423-447. 10.2307/2529430, 1174616.
2. Anderson RV, Rasby RJ, Klopfenstein TJ, Clark RT. An evaluation of production and economic efficiency of two beef systems from calving to slaughter. J Anim Sci 2005, 83:694-704.
3. Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Guiroy PJ. Determining feed intake and feed efficiency of individual cattle fed in groups. Proc Beef Impr Fed 33rd Ann Res Symp Annu Meet 2001, 33:80-98.
4. Okine EK, Basarab J, Goonewardene LA, Mir P. Residual feed intake and feed efficiency: Difference and implications. Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium 2004, 27-38.
5. Archer JA, Richardson EC, Herd RM, Arthur PF. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 1999, 50:147-161.
6. Koch RM, Swiger LA, Chambers D, Gregory KE. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1963, 22:486-494.
7. Kennedy BW, Werf JH, Meuwissen TH. Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. J Anim Sci 1993, 71:3239-3250.
8. Garrick DJ. Development of genetic evaluations and decision support to improve feed efficiency. Proc Beef Impr Fed 38th Ann Res Symp Annu Meet 2006, 38:32-40.
9. Hazel LN. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 1943, 28:476-490. 1209225, 17247099.
10. Herd RM, Archer JA, Arthur PF. Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: Opportunity and challenges to application. J Anim Sci 2003, 81:E9-17.
11. Meuwissen TH. Genomic Selection: The future of animal breeding 2007, 88-91., http://www.umb.no/statisk/husdyrforsoksmoter/2007/23.pdf
12. Spangler ML, Bertrand JK, Rekaya R. Combining genetic test information and correlated phenotypic records for breeding value estimation. J Anim Sci 2007, 85:641-649. 10.2527/jas.2006-617, 17085722.
13. Meuwissen TH. Genomic selection: marker assisted selection on a genome wide scale. J Anim Breed Genet 2007, 124:321-322.
14. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS. Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:16-24. 10.3168/jds.2008-1514, 19109259.
15. Schaeffer LR. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 2006, 123:218-223. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x, 16882088.
16. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited Review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:433-443. 10.3168/jds.2008-1646, 19164653.
17. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829. 1461589, 11290733.
18. Dekkers JCM. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet 2007, 124:331-341.
19. Garrick DJ. Equivalent mixed model equations for genomic selection [abstract]. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:376. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72639-5, 17183106.
20. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Technical note: Prediction of breeding values using marker derived relationship matrices. J. Anim Sci 2008, 86:2089-2092. 10.2527/jas.2007-0733, 18407982.
21. VanRaden PM. Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:4414-4423. 10.3168/jds.2007-0980, 18946147.
22. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, De Roos APW, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 2008, 178:553-561. 10.1534/genetics.107.080838, 2206101, 18202394.
23. Van-Arendonk JA, Tier MB, Kinghorn BP. Use of multiple genetic markers in prediction of breeding values. Genetics 1994, 137:319-329. 1205948, 8056319.
24. Matsuda H, Iwaisaki H. A recursive procedure to compute the gametic relationship matrix and its inverse for marked QTL clusters. Genes Genet Syst 2002, 77:123-130. 10.1266/ggs.77.123, 12087195.
25. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res, Camb 2009, 91:47-60.
26. Boldman KG, Kriese LA, Van Vleck LD, Van Tassell CP, Kachman SD. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variance and covariance. 1995, USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Clay Center, NE.
27. Zhang Z, Todhunter RJ, Buckler ES, Van Vleck LD. Technical note: Use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood. J Anim Sci 2007, 85:881-885. 10.2527/jas.2006-656, 17085728.
28. De Roos APW, Schrooten C, Mullaart E, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:4821-4829. 10.3168/jds.2007-0158, 17881705.
29. Guillaume F, Fritz S, Boichard D, Druet T. Estimation by simulation of the efficiency of the French marker-assisted selection program in dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2008, 40:91-102. 2674921, 18096117.
30. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 1989, Plainview: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
31. Archer JA, Arthur PF, Herd RM, Parnell PF, Pitchford WS. Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. Journal of Animal Science 2009, 75:2024-32.
32. Van Tassell CP, Smith TPL, Matukumalli LK, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, Lawley CT, Haudenschild CD, Moore SS, Warren WC, Sonstegard TS. SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries. Nat Methods 2008, 5:247-252. 10.1038/nmeth.1185, 18297082.
33. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLOS One 2009, 4:e5350. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350, 2669730, 19390634.
34. Steemers FJ, Chang W, Lee G, Barker DL, Shen R, Gunderson KL. Whole-genome genotyping with the single-base extension assay. Nat Methods 2006, 3:31-33. 10.1038/nmeth842, 16369550.
35. Scheet P, Stephens M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet 2006, 78:629-644. 10.1086/502802, 1424677, 16532393.
36. Quaas RL, Pollak EJ. Mixed Model Methodology for Farm and Ranch Beef Cattle Testing Programs. J Anim Sci 1980, 51:1277-1287.
37. Hudson GFS, Quaas RL, Van Vleck LD. Computer algorithm for the recursive method of calculating large numerator relationship matrices. J Dairy Sci 1982, 65:2018-2022.
38. Arthur PF, Archer JA, Johnston DJ, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Parnell PF. Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:2805-2811.
39. Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Moore SS. Whole genome SNP associations with feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2010, 88(1):16-22. 10.2527/jas.2008-1759, 19749024.
40. Weaber RL. A simulation study of replacement sire selection and genetic evaluation strategies for large commercial ranches. PhD Dissertation 2006, 193. Cornell University, Animal Sciences Department.
41. Heaton MP, Harhay GP, Bennett GL, Stone RT, Grosse WM, Casas E, Keele JW, Smith TPL, Chitko-McKown CG, Laegreid WW. Selection and use of SNP markers for animal identification and paternity analysis in U.S. beef cattle. Mammalian Genome 2002, 13:272-281. 10.1007/s00335-001-2146-3, 12016516.