The effects of airline and high speed train integration

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 49, Issue , 2013, Pages 160-177

  Socorro, M Pilar ^a   Viecens, M Fernanda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN ANDRÉS   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Airline; High speed train (HST); Integration

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; INTEGRATION; RAILROAD CARS; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION;

AIRLINE COMPETITION; CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS; EMPIRICAL PREDICTIONS; HIGH SPEED TRAIN (HST); POLICY MAKERS; SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL; THEORETICAL MODELING;

RAILROADS;

AIR TRANSPORTATION; AIRLINE INDUSTRY; AIRPORT; HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; MODELING; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

ANDALUCIA; MADRID [SPAIN]; MALAGA [ANDALUCIA]; SPAIN;

EID: 84873951094     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albalate D., Bel G. Cuando la economi{dotless}́a no importa: auge y esplendor de la alta velocidad en España. Revista de Economi{dotless}́a Aplicada 2011, 55(XIX):171-190.
2. Alonso, A., Betancor, O., 2011. Estudio de las posibilidades de implantación de sistemas intermodales: el caso Málaga. Colección Estudios Económicos 07-2011. Fundación de Estudios de Economi{dotless}́a Aplicada.. http://www.fedea.es/pub/est_economicos/2011/07-2011.pdf.
3. Anderson S.P., de Palma A., Thisse J.F. Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation 1992, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Basso L.J., Jara-Di{dotless}́az S.R. Integrating congestion pricing, transit subsidies and mode choice. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46:890-900.
5. Bel G. Changes in travel time across modes and its impact on the demand for inter-urban rail travel. Transportation Research Part E 1997, 33:43-52.
6. Berry S.T. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics 1994, 25(2):242-262.
7. Bilotkach V., Fageda X., Flores-Fillol R. Scheduled service versus personal transportation: the role of distance. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2010, 40:60-72.
8. Brons M., Givoni M., Rietveld P. Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:136-149.
9. Brueckner J.K., Whalen W.T. The price effects of international airline alliances. Journal of Law & Economics 2000, XLIII:503-545.
10. Buchanan and Partners, 1995. Optimising rail/air intermodality in Europe. European Commission-DG VII, London.
11. CE Delft, 2003. To shift or not to shift, that's the question. The environmental performance of the principal modes of freight and passenger transport in the policymaking context. Delft.
12. Clark D.J., Jorgensen F., Pedersen P.A. Strategic interactions between transport operators with several goals. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2009, 43(3):385-403.
13. Clark D.J., Jorgensen F., Mathisen T.A. Relationships between fares, trip length and market competition. Transportation Research Part A 2011, 45:611-624.
14. Clever R., Hansen M.M. Interaction of air and high-speed rail in Japan. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2043:1-12.
15. Commission of the European Communities, 2001. European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, COM(2001)370, September.
16. Commission of the European Communities, 2011. Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area-Towards a Competitive and Resource-Efficient Transport System. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, COM(2011)144, March.
17. Commission for Integrated Transport, 2004. High Speed Rail: International Comparisons. Commission for Integrated Transport, London.
18. De Rus G. The BCA of HSR: should the government invest in high speed rail infrastructure?. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 2011, 2(1). (Article 2).
19. De Rus G., Nombela G. Is investment in high speed rail socially profitable?. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2007, 41(1):3-23.
20. De Rus, G., Socorro, M.P., 2012. Access pricing, infrastructure investment and intermodal competition. Colección Estudios Económicos 06-2012. Fundación de Estudios de Economi{dotless}́a Aplicada. http://www.fedea.es/pub/papers/2012/dt2012-06.pdf.
21. Diana M. Measuring the satisfaction of multimodal travelers for local transit services in different urban contexts. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46:1-11.
22. Dixit A.K. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. Bell Journal of Economics 1979, 10:20-32.
23. Doganis, R., 2002. The Future of Hubbing in London, Rigas Doganis & Associates, October. < (23.05.03)>. http://www.baa.co.uk/pdf/HubbinginLondon.pdf.
24. Eurocontrol, 2004. Analysis and Modelling of Passenger Choice between Air and Rail Transportation Modes. CARE Innovative Action Project, Innovative Route Charges Schemes, Work Package 3.
25. Flores-Fillol R., Moner-Colonques R. Strategic formation of airline alliances. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2007, 41(3):427-449.
26. Givoni, M., 2005. Aircraft and High Speed Train Substitution: The Case for Airline and Railway Integration, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University College, London.
27. Givoni M. Environmental benefits from mode substitution: comparison of the environmental impact from aircraft and high-speed train operations. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2007, 1(4):209-230.
28. Givoni M. Air-rail intermodality from airlines' perspective. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 2007, 1(3):224-238.
29. Givoni M., Banister D. Airline and railway integration. Transport Policy 2006, 13:386-397.
30. Givoni M., Banister D. Role of railways in the future of air transport. Transportation Planning and Technology 2007, 30(1):95-112.
31. González-Savignat M. Competition in air transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2004, 38(1):77-108.
32. Grimme W.G. Air/rail passenger intermodality concepts in Germany. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 2007, 1(3):251-263.
33. IATA, 2003. Air/rail intermodality study. February, p. 92.
34. INFRAS/IWW, 2000. External costs of transport. Report commissioned by UIC. Zurich-Karlsruhe-Paris.
35. Janic M. The potential for modal substitution. Towards Sustainable Aviation 2003, 131-148. Earthscan, London. P. Upham, J. Maughan, D. Raper, C. Thomas (Eds.).
36. Kageson, P., 2009. Environmental Aspects of Inter-City Passenger Transport. Discussion Paper 2009-28. OECD-ITF Transport Research Centre.
37. Lin M.H. Strategic airline alliances and endogenous Stackelberg equilibria. Transportation Research Part E 2004, 40(5):357-384.
38. López-Pita A. The effects of high-speed rail on the reduction of air traffic congestion. Journal of Public Transportation 2003, 6(1):37-49.
39. López-Pita, A., Robusté, F., 2004. Impact of high-speed lines in relations with very high frequency air services. In: Transportation Research Board (TRB) 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
40. Maskin C. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 1977, 8:229-254.
41. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, Academic Press, New York. P. Zareembka (Ed.).
42. Mishra S., Welch F.W., Jha M.K. Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46:1066-1085.
43. Nombela, G., Hernández, A., Ladouse, S., Herranz, R., Sánchez, V., 2010. Primer informe de seguimiento. Documento 1. Proyecto AERO-AVE. http://www.aeroave.es/ficheros/documentos/publicos/D1documentos_Informe_Seguimiento_1.pdf.
44. Pavaux, J., 1994. Air-rail complementarity in Europe: lessons fro intermodalism in America. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 73rd Annual Meeting, 9-13 January, Washington, DC.
45. Oum T.H., Fu X. Air transport security user charge pricing: an investigation of flat per-passenger charge vs. ad valorem user charge schemes. Transportation Research Part E 2007, 43:283-293.
46. Schreyer, C., Schneider, C., Maibach, M., Rothengatter, W., Doll, C., Schmedding, D., 2004. External Costs of Transport: Update Study. INFRAS and IWW (Institut für Wirtschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsforschung, o (translated) Institute for Economic Policy and Research).
47. Singh N., Vives X. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand Journal of Economics 1984, 15(4):546-554.
48. Socorro M.P., Betancor O. The welfare effects of the allocation of airlines to different terminals. Transportation Research Part E 2010, 46:236-248.
49. Steer Davies Gleave, 2006. Air and Rail Competition and Complementarity. Case Study Report Prepared for European Commission DG Energy and Transport, pp. 1-149.
50. Stubbs J., Jegede F. The integration of rail and air transport in Britain. Journal of Transport Geography 1998, 6(1):53-67.
51. Tapiador F.J., Burckhart K., Marti{dotless}́-Henneberg J.M. Characterizing European high speed train stations using intermodal time and entropy metrics. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:197-208.
52. The Observer, 2004. Why slots sales are key to airlines' take-off, 11 April. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2004/apr/11/theairlineindustry.theobserver.
53. Van Exel N.J.A., Rietveld P. Could you also have made this trip by another mode? An investigation of perceived travel possibilities of car and train travellers on the main travel corridors to the city of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:374-385.
54. Vespermann J., Wald A. Long-term perspectives of intermodal integration at airports. Airport Management 2010, 4(3):252-264.
55. Vickerman, R., 2009. Indirect and wider economic impacts of high speed rail. In: de Rus, G. (Ed.), Economic Analysis of High Speed Rail in Europe. Fundación BBVA, Madrid.
56. Zhang Y., Hansen M. Real-time intermodal substitution: strategy for airline recovery from schedule perturbation and for mitigation of airport congestion. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2052:90-99.