Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1066-1085

  Mishra, Sabyasachee ^a   Welch, Timothy F ^a   Jha, Manoj K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Center of Excellence for Tactical and Advanced Communications Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Graph theory; Multimodal transit network; Public transportation

Indexed keywords

FINANCE; GRAPH THEORY; LOCATION; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

CONNECTIVITY; EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; MULTI-MODAL TRANSIT NETWORKS; MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS; MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS; PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS; SERVICE DELIVERY STRATEGIES;

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEMAND ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PLANNING METHOD; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

BALTIMORE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; MARYLAND; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA];

EID: 84861208782     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ahmed, Adel, Dwyer, Tim, Forster, Michael, Fu, Xiaoyan, Ho, Joshua, Hong, Seok-Hee, KoschÜtzki, Dirk, et al., 2006. GEOMI: GEOmetry for maximum insight. In: Healy, Patrick, Nikolov, Nikola S. (Eds.), Graph Drawing, vol. 3843. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 468-479.
2. Aittokallio Tero, Schwikowski Benno Graph-based methods for analysing networks in cell biology. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2006, 7(3):243-255.
3. APTA, 2009. Defining Transit Areas of Influence. American Public Transportation Association, Document Number: APTA SUDS-UD-RP-001-09. (accessed 04.02.12). http://www.aptastandards.com/portals/0/SUDS/SUDSPublished/APTA%20SUDS-UD-009-01_areas_of_infl.pdf.
4. APTA, 2011. Public Transit Ridership Report, Third Quarter 2011. http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Documents/Ridership/2011-q3-ridership-APTA.pdf.
5. Araujo O., de la Peña J.A. The connectivity index of a weighted graph. Linear Algebra and its Applications 1998, 283(1-3):171-177.
6. Bader, David A., Madduri, Kamesh, 2006. Parallel algorithms for evaluating centrality indices in real-world networks. In: Parallel Processing, International Conference. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 539-550.
7. Barthlemy M. Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter 2004, 38(2):163-168.
8. Basak Subhash C., Bertelsen Sharon, Grunwald Gregory D. Application of graph theoretical parameters in quantifying molecular similarity and structure-activity relationships. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1994, 34(2):270-276.
9. Baughan, K.J., Constantinou, C.C., Stepanenko, A.S., 2009. Understanding resiliency and vulnerability in transport network design. In: Proceedings of European Transport Conference.
10. Beimborn E.A., Greenwald M.J., Jin X. Accessibility, connectivity, and captivity: impacts on transit choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1835(1):1-9.
11. Bell David C., Atkinson John S., Carlson Jerry W. Centrality measures for disease transmission networks. Social Networks 1999, 21(1):1-21.
12. Bonacich Phillip Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks 2007, 29(4):555-564.
13. Bonacich Phillip, Lloyd Paulette Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Social Networks 2001, 23(3):191-201.
14. Borgatti Stephen P. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 2005, 27(1):55-71.
15. Brandes Ulrik A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2001, 25(2):163-177.
16. Caporossi Gilles, Gutman Ivan, Hansen Pierre Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs: IV: chemical trees with extremal connectivity index. Computers & Chemistry 1999, 23(5):469-477.
17. Caporossi Gilles, Gutman Ivan, Hansen Pierre, Pavlovic Ljiljana Graphs with maximum connectivity index. Computational Biology and Chemistry 2003, 27(1):85-90.
18. Carrington, Peter J., Scott, John, Wasserman, Stanley, 2005. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
19. Costenbader Elizabeth, Valente Thomas W. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks 2003, 25(4):283-307.
20. Crucitti, Paolo, Latora, Vito, Porta, Sergio, 2006. Centrality in networks of urban streets. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 16(1), 015113.
21. Dajani J.S., Gilbert G. Measuring the performance of transit systems. Transportation Planning and Technology 1978, 4(2):97-103.
22. Derrible Sybil, Kennedy Christopher Network analysis of world subway systems using updated graph theory. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2009, 2112(1):17-25.
23. ESRI, 2010. ArcInfo 10.0 for Desktop. Developed by ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA.
24. Estrada Ernesto, Rodŕguez-Veĺzquez Juan A. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E 2005, 71(5):056103.
25. Frank Lawrence D., Sallis James F., Conway Terry L., Chapman James.E., Saelens Brian E., Bachman William Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006, 72(1):75-87.
26. Freeman Linton C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1978, 1(3):215-239.
27. Garroway Colin J., Bowman Jeff, Carr Denis, Wilson Paul J. Applications of graph theory to landscape genetics. Evolutionary Applications 2008, 1(4):620-630.
28. Gauthier H.L. Transportation and the growth of the Sao Paulo. Journal of Regional Science 1968, 8(1):77-94.
29. Goh K.-I., Oh E., Kahng B., Kim D. Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks. Physical Review E 2003, 67(1):017101.
30. Guerra E., Cervero R., Tischler D. The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments? 2011, University of California, Berkeley.
31. GuimerÀ R., Mossa S., Turtschi A., Amaral L.A.N. The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and citieś global roles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(22):7794-7799.
32. Hadas Yuval, Avishai(Avi) Ceder. Public transit network connectivity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2010, 2143(1):1-8.
33. Harary, F., 1971. Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Hilgetag Claus C., Kaiser Marcus Clustered organization of cortical connectivity. Neuroinformatics 2004, 2(3):353-360.
35. Jiang B., Claramunt C. A structural approach to the model generalization of an urban street network*. GeoInformatica 2004, 8(2):157-171.
36. Junker Bjorn., Koschutzki Dirk., Schreiber Falk. Exploration of biological network centralities with CentiBiN. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7(1):219.
37. Kim J., Jun M., Kho S. Determination of a bus service coverage area reflecting passenger attributes. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2005, 6:529-543.
38. Lam T.N., Schuler H.J. Connectivity index for systemwide transit route and schedule performance. Transportation Research Record 1982, 854:17-23.
39. Latora V., Marchiori M. A measure of centrality based on network efficiency. New Journal of Physics 2007, 9(6):188.
40. Leydesdorff Loet. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(9):1303-1319.
41. Liu Xiaoming, Bollen Johan, Nelson Michael L., Van de Sompel Herbert Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management 2005, 41(6):1462-1480.
42. Mart́nez A., Dimitriadis Y., Rubia B., Ǵmez E., de la Fuente P. Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education 2003, 41(4):353-368.
43. Modarres A. Polycentricity and transit service. Transportation Research Part-A: Policy and Practice 2003, 137(10):841-864.
44. Moore Spencer, Eng Eugenia, Daniel Mark International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: a case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods. Disasters 2003, 27(4):305-318.
45. Newman M.E.J. Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E 2004, 70(5):056131.
46. Newman M.E.J. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks 2005, 27(1):39-54.
47. Opsahl Tore, Agneessens Filip, Skvoretz John Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks 2010, 32(3):245-251.
48. Otte Evelien, Rousseau Ronald Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 2002, 28(6):441-453.
49. Özgür Arzucan, Thuy Vu, Erkan Güneş, Radev Dragomir R. Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(13):i277-i285.
50. Park, J., Kang, S.C., 2011. A model for evaluating the connectivity of multimodal transit networks. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting.
51. Randic Milan The connectivity index 25 years after. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2001, 20(1):19-35.
52. Ruhnau Britta Eigenvector-centrality - a node-centrality?. Social Networks 2000, 22(4):357-365.
53. Sabljic Aleksandar, Horvatic Davor GRAPH III: a computer program for calculating molecular connectivity indices on microcomputers. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1993, 33(3):292-295.
54. Scott Darren M., Novak David C., Aultman-Hall Lisa, Guo Feng Network robustness index: a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(3):215-227.
55. Sun Li-Xian, Danzer Klaus Fuzzy cluster analysis by simulated annealing. Journal of Chemometrics 1996, 10(4):325-342.
56. White Howard D. Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(5):423-434.
57. White Douglas R., Borgatti Stephen P. Betweenness centrality measures for directed graphs. Social Networks 1994, 16(4):335-346.
58. Yang, Xiaoguang, Zhang, Chao, Zhuang, Bin, 2007. Evaluation model for the urban public transit network connectivity based on graph theory. In: Plan, Build, and Manage Transportation Infrastructures in China, Shanghai, China, pp. 35-35.
59. Zhao F., Chow L.F., Li M.T., Ubaka I., Gan A. Forecasting transit walk accessibility: regression model alternative to buffer method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1835(1):34-41.