Characterizing European high speed train stations using intermodal time and entropy metrics

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 197-208

  Tapiador, Francisco J ^a   Burckhart, Kerstin ^b   Martí Henneberg, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Entropy; High speed train station; Intermodality

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; RAILROAD CARS; RAILROADS;

ACCESSIBILITY MODEL; ENTROPY METRICS; HIGH SPEED TRAIN STATION; HIGH-SPEED RAIL STATIONS; INTER MODALITIES; OBJECTIVE MEASURE; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; STATISTICAL SAMPLES;

RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

EID: 58149388022     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bontekoning Y.M., Macharis C., and Trip J.J. Is a new applied transportation research field emerging? A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 38 1 (2004) 1-34
2. Dupuy, G., 1988. Les interconnexions. Transport et société. En: Transports no. 331, p. 430.
3. Eidgenössisches Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation und Bundesamt für Strassen, 2004. Standards für Intermodale Schnittstellen im Verkehr, SVI 2001/525, Zürich.
4. European Commission, 1999a. The European Spatial Development Perspective. (accessed 31.03.2006).
5. European Commission, 1999b. Urban Research: HSR-Comet. (accessed 27.05.2005).
6. European Commission, 1999c. Urban Research: Pirate. (accessed 31.03.2006).
7. European Commission, 1999d. Urban Research: Guide. (accessed 27.05.2005).
8. European Commission, 1999e. Task Force "Transport Intermodality". (accessed 15.05.2006).
9. European Commission, 2001a. Thematic synthesis of transport research results. Freight Intermodality, Paper 10, Transport RTD Programme.
10. European Commission, 2001b. Urban Research: MIMIC. (accessed 27.05.2005).
11. European Commission, 2001c. COST 340. Towards a European Intermodal Transport Network: Lessons from History. (accessed 10.08.2005).
12. European Commission, 2004. Towards passenger intermodality in the EU. Report 1, Dortmund, p. I.
13. European Commission, 2006. The Marco Polo Programme. (accessed 03.03.2006).
14. Gorman M.F. Evaluating the public investment mix in US freight transportation infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42 1 (2008) 1-14
15. Hultgren, K., 2002. Stations-Guide, Inter-modal Travel Centres, - Att utveckla resecentrum från dålig skarv till bra koppling. Editorial Stationsrådet, Tierp.
16. Jakob A., Craig J.L., and Fisher G. Transport cost analysis: a case study of the total costs of private and public transport in Auckland. Environmental Science & Policy 9 (2006) 55-66
17. Kreutzberger E.D. Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe: a generic approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42 7 (2008) 973-993
18. Kuby M., Barranda A., and Upchurch C. Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 38 3 (2004) 223-247
19. Lam W.H.K., Cheung C.-Y., and Lam C.F. A study of crowding effects at the Hong Kong light rail transit stations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 5 (1999) 401-415
20. Last J., et al. Heterogenität im Fernverkehr. Wie wenige reisen wie viel?. Internationales Verkehrswesen 55 (2003) 270
21. Lu, L., 2003. The vital role of Metropolitan access in intercity rail passenger transportation - and its relationship to technology. Working Paper #7, Center for Transportation Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, p. 3.
22. Margail F. De la correspondance à l'interopérabilité: les mots de l'interconnexion. Flux 25 (1996) 29-35
23. Niérat P. Market area of rail-truck terminals: pertinence of the spatial theory. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 31 2 (1997) 109-127
24. Ricci A., and Black I. The social costs of intermodal freight transport. Research in Transportation Economics 14 (2005) 245-285
25. Schönharting J., et al. Towards the multimodal transport of people and freight: interconnective networks in the RheinRuhr Metropolis. Journal of Transport Geography 11 (2003) 193-203
26. Spiekermann, K., 2005. Transport and accessibility in Europe. Interreg North Sea Programme & North Sea Commission. In: Joint Annual Conference, Vlissingen, 15 June 2005.
27. Tsamboulas D., Vrenken H., and Lekka A.M. Assessment of a transport policy potential for intermodal mode shift on a European scale. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41 8 (2007) 715-733
28. UITP, 1994. Location and design of interchanges - rail, bus and car, Brussels.
29. UITP, 2003. A one-stop approach to mobility: the challenge of integration, Brussels.
30. Vägverket, 2004. Trafik för en attraktiv stad, Stockholm, p. 212.
31. Varlet J. Réseaux de transports rapides et interconnexions en Europe Occidentale. L'information Géographique 56 (1992) 105-107
32. Victorian Transport Policy Institute, 2005. Defining, Evaluation and Improving Accessibility. (09.05.2005).
33. Yao E., and Morikawa T. A study of an integrated intercity travel demand model. Transportation Research Part A 39 (2005) 367-381