Isomalt

Sweeteners and Sugar Alternatives in Food Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 243-274

  Sentko, Anke ^a   Willibald Ettle, Ingrid ^a  

^a Beneo Palatinit GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bulk sweetener; Calorie reduced; Hard candies; Isomalt; Low glycaemic; Low hygroscopicity; Panned products; Sugar substitute; Sugar free; Sugar like taste

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873920883     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118373941.ch11     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. R. Weidenhagen and S. Lorenz. Palatinose (6-O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-D-fructofuranose), a new product obtained from the bacterial fermentation of saccharose. Zeitschr. Zuckerind. 1957, 7, 533-534.
2. H. Schiweck. Palatinit - production, technological characteristics, and analytical study of foods containing Palatinit. Alimenta 1980, 19, 5-16.
3. ®), a versatile alternative sweetener - production, properties and uses. In: D. Albert Bartens (eds). Carbohydrates in Industrial Synthesis, Berlin, 1992; pp. 5-55.
4. H. Schiweck. Isomalt, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Chemie, Weinheim; 1994, A25, pp. 426-429.
5. K. Paulus and A. Fricker. Zucker-Ersatzstoff: Anforderungen und Eigenschaften am Beispiel von Palatinit. Lebensmitteltechnologie und Verfahrenstechnik 1980, 31, 128-132.
6. D. Schäppi. Sensorische Untersuchungen an Zuckeraustauschstoffen, 3. Bericht, ETH Zürich, 1996 (unpublished).
7. Südzucker AG, ZAFES (CRDS), private communications, 1987, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2010.
8. Palatinit GmbH, Infopac, 2001.
9. G. von Rymon-Lipinsky and H. Schiweck (eds). Handbuch Süßungsmittel - Eigenschaften und Anwendungen, Behr's Verlag, Hamburg; 1990.
10. H.K. Cammenga and K. Gehrich. Eigenschaften und Rekristallisation amorpher Zucker und Zuckeraustauschstoffe, AiF Vorhaben Nr. 12097N, 2002.
11. K. Mende. Thermodynamische und rheologische Untersuchungen an Saccaridlösungen und - schmelzen, TU Berlin; 1990.
12. A. Sentko and J. Bernard. Isomalt. In: Lyn Nabors (ed.). Alternative Sweeteners 2012; CRC Press, New York, 275-297.
13. B. Zielasko. Ermittlung physikalisch-chemischer Daten von Isomalt und seinen Komponenten, Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig, Dissertation; 1997.
14. Z. Bubnik, et al. Sugar Technologists Manual, Baertens, Berlin; 1995.
15. H.K. Cammenga, L.O. Figura and B. Zielasko. Thermal behaviour of some sugar alcohols. Journal of Thermal Analysis 1996, 47, 427-434.
16. F.W. Lichtenhalter and H.J. Lindner. The preferred conformations of glycosalditols. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1981, 2372-2383.
17. J. Raudonus, J. Bernard, H. Janßen, J. Kowalczyk and R. Carle. Effect of oligomeric or polymeric additives on glass transition, viscosity and crystallization of amorphous isomalt. Food Research International 2000, 33, 41-51.
18. K. Gehrich. Phasenverhalten einiger Zucker und Zuckeraustauschstoffe, PhD Thesis, TU Braunschweig, 2002.
19. H.J. Lindner and F.W. Lichtenthaler. Extended zigzag conformation of 1-O-D-alpha-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol. Carbohydrate Research 1981, 93, 135-140.
20. U. Grupp and G. Siebert. Metabolism of hydrogenated palatinose, an equimolar mixture of alpha-D-glucopyranosido-1,6-sorbitol and alpha-D-glucopyranosido-1,6-mannitol. Research in Experimental Medicine (Berlin) 1978, 173, 261-278.
21. F. Heinz. Enzymatische Spaltung von Zuckeraustauschstoffen durch isolierte Enzyme und Enzymkomplexe derDünndarmmukose, Med. Hochschule Hannover, Forschungsvorhaben Nr. 6539 Schlussbericht vom 30.09.1987.
22. S. Ziesenitz and G. Siebert; The metabolism and utilization of polyols and other bulk sweeteners compared with sugar. Developments in Sweeteners, Vol. 3, Elsevier Applied Science, London; 1987, pp. 109-149.
23. G. Livesey. Health potential of polyols as sugar replacers, with emphasis on low glycaemic properties. Nutrition Research Reviews 2003, 16, 163-191.
24. Sydney University's Glycaemic Index Research Service (SUGiRS), Glycaemic Index Report Isomalt, Sydney, Australia; 2002.
25. I. Holub, et al. Improved metabolic control after 12-week dietary intervention with low glycaemic isomalt in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hormone and Metabolic Research 2009, 41, 886-892.
26. A. Gostner et al. Effects of isomalt consumption on gastrointestinal and metabolic parameters in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Nutrition 2005, 94, 575-581.
27. EFSA; Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to the sugar replacers xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, lactitol, isomalt, erythritol, D-tagatose, isomaltulose, sucralose and polydextrose and maintainance of tooth mineralisation by decreasing tooth demineralization (ID 463, 464, 563, 618, 647, 1182, 1591, 2907, 2921, 4300), and reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses (ID 617, 619, 669, 1590, 1762, 2903, 2908, 2920) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 2011, 9(4), 2076.
28. A. Gostner, et al. Effects of isomalt consumption on faecal microflora and colonic metabolism in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Nutrition 2006, 95, 40-50.
29. A. Lee, et al. Consensus statements from participants of the international symposium on low digestible carbohydrates. British Journal of Nutrition 2001, 85(Suppl.1), 1-3.
30. J.M. Gee, et al. Effects of conventional sucrose-based, fructose-based and isomalt-based chocolates on postbrandial metabolism in non-insulin-dependant diabetics. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1991, 45, 561-566.
31. G.A. Koutsou, et al. Dose-related gastrointestinal response to the ingestion of either isomalt, lactitol or maltitol in milk chocolate. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996, 50, 17-21.
32. A. Lee, et al. Breath hydrogen after ingestion of the bulk Sweeteners sorbitol, isomalt and sucrose in chocolate. British Journal of Nutrition 1994, 71, 731-737.
33. A. Lee, et al. The comparative gastrointestinal responses of children and adults following consumption of sweets formulated with sucrose, isomalt and lycasin HBC. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002, 56, 755-764.
34. D. M. Paige, et al. Palatinit digestibility in children. Nutrition Research 1992, 12, 27-37.
35. D. Pometta, et al. Effects of a 12-week administration of isomalt on metabolic control in Type-II Diabetics. Aktuelle Ernährung 1985, 10, 174-177.
36. M. Spengler, et al. Tolerability acceptance and energetic conversion of isomalt in comparison with sucrose. Aktuelle Ernährung 1987, 12, 210-214.
37. D. Storey, et al. The comparative gastrointestinal response of young children to the ingestion of 25 g sweets containing sucrose or isomalt. British Journal of Nutrition 2002, 87, 291-297.
38. A. Zumbé. Comparative studies of gastrointestinal tolerance and acceptability of milk chocolate containing sucrose, isomalt or sorbitol in healthy consumers and type II diabetics. Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft 1992, 31, 40-48.
39. FASEB/LSRO (Federation of American societies for Experimental Biology/Life Science Research Office), The Evaluation of the Energy of Certain Sugar Alcohols used as Food Ingredients, June 1994, Bethesda, USA.
40. Health Canada, Guide to Food Labelling and Advertising, Chapter 6, The Elements within the Nutrition Facts Table. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/labeti/guide/ch6e.pdf.
41. J. Featherstone. Effects of isomalt sweetener on the caries process: A review. Journal of Clinical Dentistry 1994, 5(3), 82-85.
42. T. Imfeld. Efficacy of sweeteners and sugar substitutes in caries prevention. Caries Research 1993, 27(1), 50-55.
43. S. Ziesenitz. Basic structure and metabolism of isomalt. In: Advances in Sweeteners, Blackie Acad. & Prof.; 1996, pp. 109-133.
44. Scientific Committee on Medicinal Products 2002, Revision of the scientific opinion on the effects of xylitol and other polyols on caries development adopted by the SCMP; 2 June 1999.
45. US FDA; 21 CFR 101.80; http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm? fr=101.80; 2 June 2011.
46. T. Shimizu. Health claims on functional foods: the Japanese regulations and an international comparison. Nutrition research Reviews 2003, 16, 241-252.
47. B. Fritzsching. Isomalt in hard candy application. The Manufacturing Confectioner, November, 1995, 75(11), 65-73.
48. BENEO-Palatinit GmbH, 2011, Technical Application Sheets.
49. T. Dörr and I. Willibald-Ettle. Evaluation of kinetics of dissolution of tablets and lozenges consisting of saccharides and sugar alcohols. Pharmazeutische Industrie 1996, 58(10), 947-952.
50. BENEO-Palatinit GmbH, Chocolate makes people feel good - even without sugar. Innovations in Food Technology 2003, 21, 66-68.
51. Südzucker AG, CRDS, private communication, 2010/2011.
52. W. Seibel, et al. BacktechnischeWirkung des Zuckeraustauschstoffes PALATINIT (Isomalt), Getreide, Mehl und Brot, Detmold; 1986, pp. 8-10, pp. 239-242, pp. 269-274, pp. 302-306.
53. Palatinit GmbH. Sugar reduced breakfast cereals can now be enjoyed, Food Marketing & Technology 2002, 16(4), 6-10.
54. JECFA. Toxicological Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. WHO Food Additive Series 1987, 20, 205-237.
55. JECFA. Compendium of Food Additive Specification, Addendum 4, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 52, 1996, pp. 79-83.
56. FAO/JECFA. http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/jecfa-additives/details.html?id=622; 2 June 2011.
57. Food Chemical Codex (FCC). Monograph on Isomalt, 2009, 7th edn, 2010, The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, USA.
58. European Pharmacopoeia. Monograph on Isomalt; 2005, 7th edn, Vol. 2, Published by: Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare of the Council of Europe (EDQM), Strasbourg, 2010, pp. 1837-1839.