Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 380-389

  Anderson, Terry ^a   McGreal, Rory ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disaggregation; Disruptive technologies; Online courses; Open educational resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873872823     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right: An updated and theoretical rational for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance learning, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/149/708
2. Anderson, T. (2004). Student services in a networked world. In J. Brindley, C. Walti & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner Support in Open, Distance and Online Learning Environments). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universitat Oldenburg.
3. Berge, Z., & Muilenburg, L. (2000). Barriers to distance education as perceived by managers and administrators: Results of a survey. In M. Clay (Ed.), Distance Learning Administration Annual 2000).
4. Castle, S. (2010). An Analysis of Student Self-Assessment of Online, Blended, and Face-to-Face Learning Environments: Implications for Sustainable Education Delivery. International Education Studies, 3(3). Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=chad_mcguire
5. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma - When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Christensen, C., & Eyring, H. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out. Jossey-Bass: Wiley.
7. Dunlap, J., Sobel, D., & Sand, D. (2007). Designing for deep and meaningful Student-to-Content interaction. Techtrends, 51(4).
8. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Jounral of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
9. Gibbs, G. (1995). The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), 147-157.
10. Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Jounral of Technology Education, 7(1).
11. Gunter, G. (2007). The Effects of the Impact of Instructional Immediacy on Cognition and Learning in Online Classes. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.akademik.unsri.ac.id/download/journal/files/waset/v2-3-30.pdf
12. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507-542.
13. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technologypp. 1017-1044). New York: Simon and Schuster.
14. Lolowich, S. (2012, January 24). Massive courses, sans Stanford. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/25/opinion/the-justice-of-occupation.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
15. Mackness, J., Fai, S., Mak, J., & Williams, R. (2010, May). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark.Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Mackness.pdf
16. Martin, L., & Mottet, T. P. (2010). The Effect of Instructor Nonverbal Immediacy Behaviors and Feedback Sensitivity on Hispanic Students' Affective Learning Outcomes in Ninth-Grade Writing Conferences. Communication Education, 60(1), 1-19.
17. McNeely, I. F., & Wolverton, L. (2008). Reinventing knowledge: from Alexandria to the Internet. New York: WW Norton & Company.
18. Monbiot, G. (2011). The Lairds of Learning. Gaurdian, Aug. 29. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist
19. Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
20. Mukherjee, A., & Stern, S. (2009). Disclosure or secrecy? The dynamics of Open Science. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(3), 449-462.
21. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Digest of education statistics: 2010. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/
22. News Report. (2011, December 19). MIT launches online learning initiative. MIT news. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/mitx-education-initiative-1219.html
23. Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: The new era of networked science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Pallof, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
25. Parry, M. (2011, Tuesday, November 22). Online Venture Energizes Vulnerable College, Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/How-Big-Can-E-Learning-Get-At/128809/
26. Pocklington, T., & Tupper, A. (2002). No place to learn: Why universities aren't working. Vancouver: UBC Press.
27. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
28. Salmon, F. (2012). Udacity and the future of online universities, Opinion, Reuters. Retrieved from http://blogs.reuters.com/felixsalmon/2012/01/23/udacity-and-the-future-of-online-universities/
29. Shaw, S. (2009). Impact of Teacher's Behaviour on the Academic Achievement of University Students. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 69-74.
30. Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: a study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. JALN, 11(2), 73-85.
31. Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated Academic Learning Time Revisited, or beyond Time on Task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11-16. Retireved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175185
32. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331.
33. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information, 2(1), 23-49. Retrieved from http://www.kent.edu/rcet/Publications/upload/SocPres%20ECI.pdf
34. Swaray, R. (2011). An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free-riding and promote active learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(6).
35. Whittaker, M. (2012, March 4). Instruction for masses knocks down campus walls. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/education/moocs-large-courses-open-to-all-topple-campus-walls.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all