Is organizational justice associated with clinical performance in the care for patients with diabetes in primary care? Evidence from the improving quality of care in diabetes study

Family Practice

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 31-39

  Elovainio, Marko ^a   Steen, Nick ^b,c   Presseau, Justin ^b,c   Francis, Jill ^d   Hrisos, Susan ^b,c   Hawthorne, Gillian ^e   Johnston, Marie ^f   Stamp, Elaine ^f   Hunter, Margaret ^g   Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^h   Eccles, Martin P ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^e NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^g NONE

^h OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical behaviour; Diabetes; Health professional; Organizational justice; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; UNITED KINGDOM; WEIGHT CONTROL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BODY WEIGHT; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC FOOT; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; NURSE'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE;

EID: 84873872148     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cms048     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047-53.
2. Eccles MP, Hawthorne G, Johnston M et al. Improving the delivery of care for patients with diabetes through understanding optimised team work and organisation in primary care. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 22.
3. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis JJ et al. Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the improving quality of care in diabetes (iQuaD) study. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 61.
4. Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 152-8.
5. Aryee S, Chen ZX, Budhwar PS. Exchange fairness and employee performance: an examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2004; 94(1): 1-14.
6. Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE. The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2001; 86: 278-321.
7. Earley PC, Lind EA. Procedural justice and participation in task selection: the role of control in mediating justice judgments. J Person Soc Psychol 1987, 52: 1148-60.
8. Konovsky MA, Cropanzano R. Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. J Appl Psychol 1991; 76: 698-707.
9. Campbell S, Hann M, Hacker J et al. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 2001; 323: 1-6.
10. Bower P, Campbell S, Bojke C, Sibbald B. Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 273-9.
11. Moorman RH. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J Appl Psychol 1991; 76: 845-855.
12. Miller DT. Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annu Rev Psychol 2001; 52: 527-53.
13. Leventhal GS. What should be done with equity theory? New approachs to study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen KS, Greenberg MS, Willis RH (eds). Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum, 1980, pp. 27-55.
14. Lind EA, Tyler TR. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum, 1988.
15. Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel RD, Rupp DE. Moral virtues, fairness heauristics, social entities and denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav 2001; 91: 164-209.
16. Folger R, Bies RJ. Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Empl Responsibil Rights J 1989; 2: 79-90.
17. Bies RJ., Moag JS. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MZ (eds). Research on Negotiations in Organizations. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 43-55.
18. Pekkarinen L, Sinervo T, Elovainio M, Noro A, Finne-Soveri H. Drug use and pressure ulcers in long-term care units: do nurse time pressure and unfair management increase the prevalence? J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 3067-73.
19. Organ DW. A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. J Manage 1988; 14: 547-54.
20. Pekkarinen L, Sinervo T, Perälä ML, Elovainio M. Work stressors and the quality of life in long-term care units. Gerontologist 2004; 44: 633-43.
21. Li A, Cropanzano R. Fairness at the group level: justice climate and intraunit justice climate. J Manage 2009; 35: 564-99.
22. Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Steen N, Kalliomäki-Levanto T. Organizational and individual factors affecting mental health and job satisfaction: a multilevel analysis of job control and personality. J Occup Health Psychol 2000; 5: 269-77.
23. Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Steen N, Vahtera J. Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: multilevel covariance structure analysis. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1659-69.
24. Elovainio M, Pietikäinen M, Luopa P et al. Organizational justice at school and its associations with pupils' psychological school environment, health and wellbeing. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72: 1675-82.
25. Erdogan B. Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Hum Resour Manage Rev 2002; 12: 555-78.
26. Folger R, Cropanzano R. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 1998.
27. Kwong JYY, Leung K. A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2002; 87: 278-99.
28. Lau CM, Lim EW. The intervening effects of participation on the relationship between procedural justice and managerial performance. Br Account Rev 2002; 34: 55-78.
29. Friedland N, Thibaut J, Walker L. Some determinants of the violation of rules. J Appl Soc Psychol 1973; 3: 103-18.
30. Greenberg J, Scott KS. Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds). Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, Vol 18. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, Amsterdam, Holland 1996, pp. 111-56.
31. Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav 2001; 58: 164-209.
32. Godin G, Bélanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci 2008; 3: 36.
33. Greenberg J, Colquitt JA. Handbook of Organizational Justice. New Jersey: LEA, 2005.