Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 83 A, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 197-204

  Kummrow, A ^a   Frankowski, M ^a   Bock, N ^a   Werner, C ^a   Dziekan, T ^a   Neukammer, J ^a  

^a PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell viability; Flow cytometry; Live dead test; Microscopy; Monocytes

Indexed keywords

CALCEIN AM; CD14 ANTIGEN; DRUG DERIVATIVE; ETHIDIUM; ETHIDIUM HOMODIMER; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; FLUORESCENT DYE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL SEPARATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; MALE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; MONOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; STAINING;

ADULT; ANTIGENS, CD14; CELL SEPARATION; CELL SURVIVAL; ETHIDIUM; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MONOCYTES; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 84873857779     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22213     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Fritzsche M, Mandenius CF. Fluorescent cell-based sensing approaches for toxicity testing. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010; 398: 181-191.
2. Kaneshiro ES, Wyder MA, Wu YP, Cushion MT. Reliability of calcein acetoxy methyl ester and ethidium homodimer or propidium iodide for viability assessment of microbes. J Microbiol Methods 1993; 17: 1-16.
3. Lévesque A, Paquet A, Pagé M. Measurement of tumor necrosis factor activity by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1995; 20: 181-184.
4. Park JH, Chung BG, Lee WG, Kim J, Brigham MD, Shim J, Lee S, Hwang C, Durmus NG, Demirici U, Khademhosseini A. Microporous cell-laden hydrogels for engineered tissue constructs. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010; 106: 138-148.
5. Perez-Oteyza J, Bornstein R, Corral M, Hermosa V, Alegre A, Torrabadella M, Ramos P, Garcia J, Odriozola J, Navarro JL. Controlled-rate versus uncontrolled-rate cryopreservation of peripheral blood progenitor cells: A prospective multicenter study. Haematologica 1998; 83: 1001-1005.
6. King MA. Detection of dead cells and measurement of cell killing by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 2000; 243: 155-166.
7. Koya RC, Weber JS, Kasahara N, Lau R, Villacres MC, Levine AM, Stripecke R. Making dentritic cells from the inside out: Lentiviral vector-mediated gene delivery of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin 4 into CD14+ monocytes generates dentritic cells in vitro. Human Gene Therapy 2004; 15: 733-748.
8. Setiyono A, Budiyati AD, Purwantomo S, Anggelia MR, Fanany I, Wibowo GA, Bachtiar I, Utama A, Tai S. Immunoregulatory effects of AFP domains on monocyte-derived dendritic cell function. BMC Immunol 2011; 12: 4.
9. Köhler G, Milstein C. Continuous culture of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975; 256: 495-497.
10. Glass MC, Handley HH, Hagiwara H, Royston I. UC 729-6, a human lymphoblastoid B-cell line useful for generating antibody-secreting human-human hybridomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80: 6327-6331.
11. Geaugey V, Pascal F, Engasser JM, Marc A. Influence of the culture oxygenation on the release of LDH by hybridoma cells. Biotech Tech 1990; 4: 257-262.
12. Ashcroft RG, Lopez PA. Commercial high speed machines open new opportunities in high throughput flow cytometry (HTFC). J Immunol Methods 2000; 243: 13-24.
13. Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Roeder M. Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: Unraveling the immune system. Nature Rev 2004; 4: 648-655.
14. Sivaraman A, Leach JK, Townsend S, Iida T, Hogan BJ, Stolz DB, Fry R, Samson LD, Tannenbaum SR, Griffith LG. A microscale in vitro physiological model of the liver: Predictive screens for drug metabolism and enzyme induction. Curr Drug Metab 2005; 6: 569-591.
15. Sudo R, Chung S, Zervantonakis IK, Vickerman V, Toshimitsu Y, Griffith LG, Kamm RD. Transport-mediated angiogenesis in 3D epithelial coculture. FASEB J 2009; 23: 2155-2164.
16. Grogan SP, Aklin B, Frenz M, Brunner T, Schaffner T, Mainil-Valet P. In-vitro model for the study of necrosis and apoptosis in native cartilage. J Pathol 2002; 198: 5-13.
17. Lange H, Bavouzet JM, Taillander P, Delorme C. Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae suspensions. Biotech Tech 1993; 7: 223-228.
18. Kim JS, Nam, MH, An SSA, Lim CS, Hur DS, Chung C, Chang JK. Comparison of the automated fluorescence microscopic viability test with the conventional and flow cytometry methods. J Clin Lab Anal 2011; 25: 90-94.
19. Jones KH, Senft JA. An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetat-Propidium iodide. J Histochem Cytochem 1985; 33: 77-79.
20. Zhou S, Cui Z, Urban J. Dead cell counts during serum cultivation are underestimated by the fluorescent live/dead assay. Biotechnol J 2011; 6: 513-518.
21. Weston SA, Parish CR. Calcein: A novel marker for lymphocytes which enter lymph nodes. Cytometry 1992; 13: 739-749.
22. Braut-Boucher F, Pichon J, Rat P, Adolphe M, Aubery M, Font J. A non-isotopic, highly sensitive fluorimetric, cell-cell adhesion microplate assay using calcein AM-labeled lymphocytes. J Immunol Methods 1995; 178: 41-51.
23. Rotman B, Papermaster BW. Membrane properties of living mammalian cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1966; 55: 134-141.
24. Markovits J, Roques BP, Le Peco, JB. Ethidium dimer: A new reagent for the fluorometric determination of nucleic acids. Anal Biochem 1979; 94: 259-264.
25. Haugland RP, Oreg E, MacCoubrey IC, Moore PL. Dual-Fluorescent Cell Viability Assay Using Ethidium Homodimer and Calcein AM. US Patent 5, 314, 805, 1994.
26. De Clerck LS, Bridts CH, Mertens AM, Moens MM, Stevens WJ. Use of fluorescent dyes in the determination of adherence of human leucocytes to endothelial cells and effect of fluorochromes on cellular function. J Immunol Methods 1994; 172: 115-124.
27. Papadopoulos NG, Dedoussis GVZ, Spanakos G, Gritzapis AD, Baxevanis CN, Papmichail M. An improved fluorescence assay for the determination of lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity using flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 1994; 177: 101-111.
28. McCullough J, Carter SJ, Quie PG. Effects of anticoangulants and storage on granulocyte function in bank blood. Blood 1974; 43: 207-217.
29. Nielsen H, Blom J, Larsen SO. Human monocyte function in vitro: Influence of conditions during transport of blood from patient to laboratory. J Immunol Methods 1981; 46: 205-209.
30. Bøyum, A. Separation of white blood cells. Nature 1964; 204: 793-794.
31. Miltenyi S, Müller W, Weichel W, Radbruch A. High gradient magnetic cell separation with MACS. Cytometry 1990; 11: 231-238.
32. Hulett HR, Bonner WA, Barrett J, Herzenberg LA. Cell sorting: Automated separation of mammalian cells as a function of intracellular fluorescence. Science 1969; 653: 747-749.
33. Ost V, Neukammer J, Rinneberg H. Flow cytometric differentiation of erythrocytes and leucocytes in dilute whole blood by light scattering. Cytometry 1998; 32: 191-197.
34. Lee SJJ. Method for Identifying Objects Using Data Processing Techniques. US Patent 5, 528, 703, 1996.
35. Ecker RC, Steiner GE. Microscopy-based multicolor tissue cytometry at the single-cell level. Cytometry A 2004; 59: 182-190.
36. Löffler H, Rastetter J, Haferlach T. Atlas of Clinical Hematology, 5th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2005. pp 54-56.
37. Freshney RI. Culture of animal cells: A Manual of Basic Technique and Specialized Applications, 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p 337.