Comparison of the automated fluorescence microscopic viability test with the conventional and flow cytometry methods

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 90-94

  Kim, Jang Su ^a   Nam, Myung Hyun ^a   An, Seong Soo A ^b,c   Lim, Chae Seung ^a,b   Hur, Dae Sung ^d   Chung, Chanil ^d   Chang, Jun Koon ^d  

^a Department of Laboratory Medicine ^*  (South Korea)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c Gachon University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Nanoentek Corporation   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Flow cytometry; Microchip; Microscopic cell counter; Propidium iodide; Trypan blue; Viability

Indexed keywords

PROPIDIUM IODIDE; TRYPAN BLUE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD SAMPLING; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HEPARINIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MICROCHIP ANALYSIS; MONONUCLEAR CELL; NORMAL HUMAN;

CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CELL SURVIVAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LEUKOCYTES, MONONUCLEAR; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRYPAN BLUE;

EID: 79952667695     PISSN: 08878013     EISSN: 10982825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20438     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Boyum A. Separation of white blood cells. Nature 1964;204:793-794.
2. Jones KH, Senft JA. An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetate-propidium iodide. J Histochem Cytochem 1985;33:77-79.
3. Bae SY, Lee CH, Kim JS, et al. Portable microscopic cell counter for the determination of residual leucocytes in blood components. Vox Sang 2007;92:64-68.
4. Bae SY, Park HC, Oh JS, et al. Absolute CD4+cell count using a plastic microchip and a microscopic cell counter. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2009;76:345-353.
5. Ross DD, Joneckis CC, Ordonez JV, et al. Estimation of cell survival by flow cytometric quantification of fluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide viable cell number. Cancer Res 1989;49:3776-3782.
6. Pore RS. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by flow cytometry. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994;34:613-627.
7. Szabo SE, Monroe SL, Fiorino S, et al. Evaluation of an automated instrument for viability and concentration measurements of cryopreserved hematopoietic cells. Lab Hematol 2004;10:109-111.
8. Xiao M, Dooley DC. Assessment of cell viability and apoptosis in human umbilical cord blood following storage. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 2003;12:115-122.
9. Liegler TJ, Hyun W, Yen TS, et al. Detection and quantification of live, apoptotic, and necrotic human peripheral lymphocytes by single-laser flow cytometry. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1995;2:369-376.
10. O'Brien MC, Bolton WE. Comparison of cell viability probes compatible with fixation and permeabilization for combined surface and intracellular staining in flow cytometry. Cytometry 1995;19:243-255.
11. Garner DL, Johnson LA, Yue ST, et al. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J Androl 1994;15:620-629.
12. Vesey G, Narai J, Ashbolt N, et al. Detection of specific microorganisms in environmental samples using flow cytometry. Methods Cell Biol 1994;42:489-522.
13. Diaper JP, Tither K, Edwards C. Rapid assessment of bacterial viability by flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1992;38:268-272.
14. Darzynkiewicz Z, Li X, Gong J. Assays of cell viability: Discrimination of cells dying by apoptosis. Methods Cell Biol 1994;41:15-38.