Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 67-101

  Apel, Robert ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crime decision making; Perceptual deterrence; Rational choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873747513     PISSN: 07484518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-012-9170-1     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Albert D, Steinberg L (2011) Judgment and decision making in adolescence. J Res Adol 21: 211-224.
2. Andenaes J (1974) Punishment and deterrence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
3. Anderson DA (2002) The deterrence hypothesis and picking pockets at the pickpocket's hanging. Am Law Econ Rev 4: 295-313.
4. Anwar S, Loughran TA (2011) Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology 49: 667-698.
5. Apel R, Nagin DS (2011) General deterrence: a review of recent evidence. In: Wilson JQ, Petersilia J (eds) Crime and public policy, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 411-436.
6. Apel R, Pogarsky G, Bates L (2009) The sanctions-perceptions link in a model of school-based deterrence. J Quant Criminol 25: 201-226.
7. Apospori E, Alpert G (1993) The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in changes in perceptions of severity of legal sanctions over time. J Res Crime Delinq 39: 184-194.
8. Apospori E, Alpert G, Paternoster R (1992) The effect of involvement with the criminal justice system: a neglected dimension of the relationship between experience and sanctions. Justice Q 9: 379-392.
9. Ariely D, Lowenstein G (2006) The heat of the moment: the effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. J Behav Decis Making 19: 87-98.
10. Assembly Committee on Criminal Procedure (1968) Deterrent effects of criminal sanctions. Assembly of the State of California, Sacramento.
11. Bachman R, Paternoster R, Ward S (1992) The rationality of sexual offending: testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law Soc Rev 26: 343-372.
12. Beccaria C (1764/1963) On crimes and punishments. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (translated by Henry Paolucci).
13. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76: 169-217.
14. Bennett T, Wright R (1984a) Burglars on burglary. Gower, Brookfield.
15. Bennett T, Wright R (1984b) Constraints to burglary: the offender's perspective. In: Clarke R, Hope T (eds) Coping with Burglary: research perspectives on policy. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, pp 181-200.
16. Bentham J (1789/1988) The principles of morals and legislation. Prometheus Books, Amherst.
17. Beyth-Marom R, Austin L, Fischoff B, Palmgren C, Jacobs-Quadrel M (1993) Perceived consequences of risky behaviors: adults and adolescents. Dev Psychol 29: 549-563.
18. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1984) Patterns in crime. Macmillan, New York.
19. Bridges GS, Stone JA (1986) Effects of criminal punishment on perceived threat of punishment: toward an understanding of specific deterrence. J Res Crime Delinq 23: 207-239.
20. Carmichael SE, Piquero AR (2006) Deterrence and arrest ratios. Int J Offend Therapy Compar Criminol 50: 71-87.
21. Carroll JS (1978) A psychological approach to deterrence: the evaluation of crime opportunities. J Pers Soc Psychol 36: 1512-1520.
22. Carroll J, Weaver F (1986) Shoplifters' perceptions of crime opportunities: a process-tracing study. In: Cornish DB, Clarke RV (eds) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York, pp 19-38.
23. Cherbonneau M, Copes H (2006) "Drive it like you stole it": auto theft and the illusion of normalcy. Br J Criminol 46: 193-211.
24. Clarke RV (1983) Situational crime prevention: its theoretical basis and practical scope. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: an annual review of research, vol 4. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 225-256.
25. Clarke RV, Cornish DB (1985) Modeling offenders' decisions: a framework for research and policy. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: an annual review of research, vol 6. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 147-185.
26. Claster DS (1967) Comparison of risk perception between delinquents and non-delinquents. J Crim Law Criminol 58: 80-86.
27. Cook PJ (1977) Punishment and crime: a critique of current findings concerning the preventive effects of punishment. Law Contemp Prob 41: 164-204.
28. Cook PJ (1980) Research in criminal deterrence: laying the groundwork for the second decade. In: Morris N, Tonry M (eds) Crime and justice: an annual review of research, vol 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 211-268.
29. Cornish DB, Clarke RV (eds) (1986) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York.
30. Cromwell PF, Olson JN, Avar DW (1991) Breaking and entering: an ethnographic analysis of burglary. Sage, Newbury Park.
31. Crouch BM (1993) Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Q 10: 67-88.
32. Dominitz J, Manski CF (1997) Perceptions of economic insecurity: evidence from the survey of economic expectations. Public Opin Q 61: 261-287.
33. Doob AN, Webster CM (2003) Sentence severity and crime: accepting the null hypothesis. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 30. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 143-195.
34. Erickson ML, Gobbs JP (1978) Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and the deterrence doctrine. Soc Probl 25: 253-264.
35. Feeney F (1986) Robbers as decision-makers. In: Cornish DB, Clarke RV (eds) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York, pp 53-71.
36. Fischhoff B, Bruine de Bruin W (1999) Fifty-fifty = 50%? J Behav Decis Making 12: 149-163.
37. Freeman RB (1999) The economics of crime. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3C. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3529-3571.
38. Gardner M, Steinberg L (2005) Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev Psychol 41: 625-635.
39. Geerken MR, Gove WR (1975) Deterrence: some theoretical considerations. Law Soc Rev 9: 497-513.
40. Gibbs JP (1975) Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Elsevier, New York.
41. Grasmick HG, Bryjak GJ (1980) The deterrent effect of perceived severity of punishment. Soc Forces 59: 471-491.
42. Greenberg DF (1981) Methodological issues in survey research on the inhibition of crime. J Crim Law Criminol 72: 1094-1101.
43. Grube JW, Kearney KA (1983) A "mandatory" jail sentence for drinking and driving. Eval Rev 7: 235-246.
44. Haase CM, Silbereisen RK (2011) Effects of positive affect on risk perceptions in adolescence and young adulthood. J Adol 34: 29-37.
45. Hjalmarsson R (2009) Crime and expected punishment: changes in perceptions at the age of criminal majority. Am Law Econ Rev 11: 209-248.
46. Holt TJ, Blevins CR, Kuhns JB (in press) Examining diffusion and arrest avoidance practices among johns. Crime Delinq.
47. Horney J, Marshall IH (1992) Risk perceptions among serious offenders: the role of crime and punishment. Criminology 30: 575-593.
48. Howe ES, Brandau CJ (1988) Additive effects of certainty, severity, and celerity of punishments on judgments of crime deterrence scale value. J Appl Soc Psychol 18: 796-812.
49. Jacobs BA (1999) Dealing crack: the social world of streetcorner selling. Northeastern University Press, Boston.
50. Jacobs BA (2010) Serendipity in robbery target selection. Br J Criminol 50: 514-529.
51. Jacobs BA, Wright R (1999) Stick-up, street culture, and offender motivation. Criminology 37: 149-173.
52. Jensen GF (1969) Crime doesn't pay: correlates of a shared misunderstanding. Soc Probl 17: 189-201.
53. Johnson E, Payne J (1986) The decision to commit a crime: an information-processing analysis. In: Cornish DB, Clarke RV (eds) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York, pp 170-185.
54. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG (1981) Cannabis decriminalization: the impact on youth 1975-1980. Monitoring the future occasional paper no. 13. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor.
55. Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93: 1449-1475.
56. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291.
57. Kleck G, Barnes JC (in press, a) Deterrence and macro-level perceptions of punishment risks: is there a "collective wisdom"? Crime Delinq.
58. Kleck G, Barnes JC (in press b) Do more police lead to more crime deterrence? Crime Delinq.
59. Kleck G, Sever B, Li S, Gertz M (2005) The missing link in general deterrence research. Criminology 43: 623-659.
60. Klepper S, Nagin D (1989) Tax compliance and perceptions of the risks of detection and criminal prosecution. Law Soc Rev 23: 209-240.
61. Lattimore P, Witte A (1986) Models of decision making under uncertainty: the criminal choice. In: Cornish DB, Clarke RV (eds) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York, pp 129-155.
62. Lee DS, McCrary J (2005) Crime, punishment, and myopia. NBER working paper no. 11491. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
63. Levitt SD (1998) Juvenile crime and punishment. J Polit Econ 106: 1156-1185.
64. Lochner L (2007) Individual perceptions of the criminal justice system. Am Econ Rev 97: 444-460.
65. Loughran TA, Paternoster R, Piquero AR, Pogarsky G (2011) On ambiguity in perceptions of risk: implications for criminal decision-making and deterrence. Criminology 49: 1029-1061.
66. Loughran TA, Piquero AR, Fagan J, Mulvey EP (in press) Differential deterrence: studying heterogeneity and changes in perceptual deterrence among serious youthful offenders. Crime Delinq.
67. Lowenstein G (1996) Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 65: 272-292.
68. Lowenstein G, Nagin D, Paternoster R (1997) The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulness. J Res Crime Delinq 34: 443-473.
69. Lowenstein G, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127: 267-287.
70. MacCoun R, Pacula RL, Chriqui J, Harris K, Reuter P (2009) Do citizens know whether their state has decriminalized marijuana? Assessing the perceptual component of deterrence theory. Rev Law Econ 5: 347-371.
71. Manski CF (2004) Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72: 1329-1376.
72. Manski CF, Molinari F (2010) Rounding probabilistic expectations in surveys. J Bus Econ Stat 28: 219-231.
73. Matsueda RL, Kreager DA, Huizinga D (2006) Deterring delinquents: a rational choice model of theft and violence. Am Sociol Rev 71: 95-122.
74. McClelland KA, Alpert GP (1985) Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: patterns of individual differences. J Quant Criminol 1: 307-318.
75. Minor WW, Harry J (1982) Deterrent and experiential effects in perceptual deterrence research: a replication and extension. J Res Crime Delinq 19: 190-203.
76. Myers DG, Lamm H (1976) The group polarization phenomenon. Psychol Bull 83: 602-627.
77. Nagin D (1978) General deterrence: a review of the empirical evidence. In: Blumstein A, Cohen J, Nagin D (eds) Deterrence and incapacitation: estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
78. Nagin DS (1998) Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 23. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1-42.
79. Nagin DS (2007) Moving choice to center stage in criminological research and theory: the American society of criminology 2006 Sutherland address. Criminology 45: 259-272.
80. Nagin DS, Paternoster R (1993) Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law Soc Rev 27: 467-496.
81. Nagin DS, Pogarsky G (2001) Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: theory and evidence. Criminology 39: 865-891.
82. Nagin DS, Pogarsky G (2003) An experimental investigation of deterrence: cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology 41: 167-193.
83. Nagin DS, Pogarsky G (2004) Time and punishment: delayed consequences and criminal behavior. J Quant Criminol 20: 295-317.
84. Nagin DS, Cullen FT, Jonson CL (2009) Imprisonment and reoffending. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 38. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 115-200.
85. Parker J, Grasmick HG (1979) Linking actual and perceived certainty of punishment: an exploratory study of an untested proposition in deterrence theory. Criminology 17: 366-379.
86. Paternoster R (1987) The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: a review of the evidence and issues. Justice Q 4: 173-217.
87. Paternoster R (1988) Examining three-wave deterrence models: a question of temporal order and specification. J Crim Law Criminol 79: 135-179.
88. Paternoster R (1989) Decisions to participate in and desist from four types of common delinquency: deterrence and the rational choice perspective. Law Soc Rev 23: 7-40.
89. Paternoster R (2010) How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? J Crim Law Criminol 100: 765-823.
90. Paternoster R, Iovanni L (1986) The deterrent effect of perceived severity: a reexamination. Soc Forces 64: 751-777.
91. Paternoster R, Piquero A (1995) Reconceptualizing deterrence: an empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences. J Res Crime Delinq 32: 251-286.
92. Paternoster R, Pogarsky G (2009) Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: the short and long-term consequences of making good choices. J Quant Criminol 25: 103-127.
93. Paternoster R, Simpson S (1996) Sanction threats and appeals to morality: testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law Soc Rev 30: 549-584.
94. Paternoster R, Saltzman LE, Chiricos TG, Waldo GP (1982) Perceived risk and deterrence: methodological artifacts in perceptual deterrence research. J Crim Law Criminol 73: 1238-1258.
95. Paternoster R, Saltzman LE, Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1983a) Estimating perceptual stability and deterrent effects: the role of perceived legal punishment in the inhibition of criminal involvement. J Crim Law Criminol 74: 270-297.
96. Paternoster R, Saltzman LE, Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1983b) Perceived risk and social control: do sanctions really deter? Law Soc Rev 17: 457-479.
97. Paternoster R, Saltzman LE, Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1985) Assessment of risk and behavioral experience: an exploratory study of change. Criminology 23: 417-436.
98. Payne JW, Braunstein ML, Carroll JS (1978) Exploring predecisional behavior: an alternative approach to decision research. Organ Behav Human Perform 22: 17-34.
99. Piliavin I, Thornton C, Gartner R, Matsueda RL (1986) Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. Am Sociol Rev 51: 101-119.
100. Piquero A, Paternoster R (1998) An application of Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence to drinking and driving. J Res Crime Delinq 35: 3-39.
101. Piquero AR, Pogarsky G (2002) Beyond Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence: personal and vicarious experiences, impulsivity, and offending behavior. J Res Crime Delinq 39: 153-186.
102. Piquero A, Rengert G (1999) Studying deterrence with active residential burglars. Justice Q 16: 451-471.
103. Piquero AR, Paternoster R, Pogarsky G, Loughran T (2011) Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Ann Rev Law Social Sci 7: 335-360.
104. Pogarsky G (2002) Identifying "deterrable" offenders: implications for research on deterrence. Justice Q 19: 431-452.
105. Pogarsky G (2009) Deterrence and decision making: research questions and theoretical refinements. In: Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Hall GP (eds) Handbook on crime and deviance. Springer, New York, pp 241-258.
106. Pogarsky G, Piquero AR (2003) Can punishment encourage offending? Investigating the "resetting" effect. J Res Crime Delinq 40: 95-120.
107. Pogarsky G, Piquero AR, Paternoster R (2004) Modeling change in perceptions about sanction threats: the neglected linkage in deterrence theory. J Quant Criminol 20: 343-369.
108. Pogarsky G, Kim K, Paternoster R (2005) Perceptual change in the national youth survey: lessons for deterrence theory and offender decision-making. Justice Q 22: 1-29.
109. Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2005) Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: a meta-analysis. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 32. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 373-450.
110. Pratt TC, Cullen FT, Blevins KR, Daigle LE, Madensen TD (2008) The empirical status of deterrence theory: a meta-analysis. In: Cullen FT, Wright JP, Blevins KR (eds) Taking stock: the status of criminological theory. Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 367-395.
111. Reiss AJ Jr (1988) Co-offending and criminal careers. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 10. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 117-170.
112. Reyna VF, Farley F (2006) Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychol Sci Public Int 7: 1-44.
113. Ross HL (1973) Law, science, and accidents: the British Road Safety Act of 1967. J Legal Stud 2: 1-78.
114. Ross HL (1982) Deterring the drinking driver: legal policy and social control. Lexington Books, Lexington.
115. Ross HL (1992) Confronting drunk driving: social policies for saving lives. Yale University Press, New Haven CT.
116. Ross HL, Voas RB (1990) The new Philadelphia story: the effects of severe punishment for drunk driving. Law Policy 12: 51-79.
117. Saltzman LE, Paternoster R, Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1982) Deterrent and experiential effects: the problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. J Res Crime Delinq 19: 172-189.
118. Scheider MC (2001) Deterrence and the base rate fallacy: an examination of perceived certainty. Justice Q 18: 63-86.
119. Sherman LW (1990) Police crackdowns: initial and residual deterrence. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 12. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1-48.
120. Shover N (1985) Aging criminals. Sage, Beverly Hills.
121. Shover N (1996) Great pretenders: pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Westview Press, Boulder.
122. Shover N, Honaker D (1992) The socially bounded decision making of persistent property offenders. Howard J Crim Justice 31: 276-294.
123. Shover N, Thompson CY (1992) Age, differential expectations, and crime desistance. Criminology 30: 89-104.
124. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart J Econ 69: 99-118.
125. Simon HA (1957) Models of man: social and rational. Wiley, New York.
126. Simon HA (1978) Rationality as process and product of thought. Am Econ Rev 8: 1-11.
127. Spear LP (2000) The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24: 417-463.
128. Stafford MC, Warr M (1993) A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. J Res Crime Delinq 30: 123-135.
129. Steinberg L (2008) A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev 28: 78-106.
130. Steinberg L, Scott ES (2003) Less guilty by reason of adolescence: developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. Am Psychol 58: 1009-1018.
131. Topalli V (2005) Criminal expertise and offender decision-making: an experimental analysis of how offenders and non-offenders differentially perceive social stimuli. Br J Criminol 45: 269-295.
132. Tunnell KD (1992) Choosing crime: the criminal calculus of property offenders. Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
133. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-1131.
134. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453-458.
135. Vinokur A (1971) Review and theoretical analysis of the effects of group processes upon individual and group decisions involving risk. Psychol Bull 76: 231-250.
136. Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1972) Perceived penal sanction and self-reported criminality: a neglected approach to deterrence research. Soc Probl 19: 522-540.
137. Weaver FM, Carroll JS (1985) Crime perceptions in a natural setting by expert and novice shoplifters. Social Psychol Q 48: 340-359.
138. Weerman FM, Smeenk WH (2005) Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: a comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology 43: 499-523.
139. Williams KR, Gibbs JP (1981) Deterrence and knowledge of statutory penalties. Sociol Q 22: 591-606.
140. Williams KR, Gibbs JP, Erickson ML (1980) Public knowledge of statutory penalties: the extent and basis of accurate perception. Pacific Sociol Rev 23: 105-128.
141. Wilson JQ, Kelling GL (1982) Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Mon March 249: 29-38.
142. Wright RT, Decker SH (1994) Burglars on the Job: streetlife and residential break-ins. Northeastern University Press, Boston.
143. Wright RT, Decker SH (1997) Armed robbers in action: stickups and street culture. Northeastern University Press, Boston.
144. Wright R, Logie RH, Decker SH (1995) Criminal expertise and offender decision making: an experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. J Res Crime Delinq 32: 39-53.
145. Wright R, Brookman F, Bennett T (2006) The foreground dynamics of street robbery in Britain. Br J Criminol 46: 1-15.
146. Zimring F, Hawkins G (1968) Deterrence and marginal groups. J Res Crime Delinq 2: 100-114.
147. Zimring FE, Hawkins GJ (1973) Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.