Citation increments between collaborating countries

Scientometrics

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 817-831

  Lancho Barrantes, Bárbara S ^a   Guerrero Bote, Vicente P ^a   de Moya Anegón, Félix ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Citation increment; Scientific collaboration in subject areas; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873746911     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0797-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abt, H. (2007). The frequencies of multinational papers in various sciences. Scientometrics, 72(1), 105-115.
2. Aksnes, D. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159-170.
3. Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: the Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877-890.
4. Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C., & Quintana, L. (2009). A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974-2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanistic studies in minority languages. Scientometrics, 81(2), 347-366.
5. Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2001). Authorship pattern in different disciplines. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 48(4), 139-147.
6. Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2004). Authorship collaboration in physics philosophy and political science, IASLIC National Seminar, 11th. Kolkata, 2004, 405-409.
7. Bridgstock, M. (1991). The quality of single and multiple authored papers- an unresolved problem. Scientometrics, 21(1), 37-48.
8. Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Hassan-Montero, Y., González-Molina, A., & Moya Anegón, F. (2010). Newapproach to the visualization of international scientific collaboration. Information Visualization, 9(4), 277-287.
9. Ding, Y., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval. The International Information & Library Review, 30(4), 367-376.
10. Figg, W. D., Dunn, L., Liewehr, D. J., Steinberg, S. M., Thurman, P. W., Barrett, J. C., et al. (2006). Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles. Pharmacotherapy, 26(6), 759-767.
11. Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540-553.
12. Kraut R., Egido C., & Galeguer, J. (1988). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. 'CSCW '88: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-12.
13. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.
14. Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University's publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251-265.
15. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international and scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
16. Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences: A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies, 1980-1998. Library Trends, 50(3), 461-473.
17. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international coauthorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
18. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185-202.
19. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & De Roue, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration network and « Pheriphery effects » in the citation of New Zeland Crown Research Institutes articles, 1992-2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321-337.
20. Hsu, J. W., & Huang, D. W. (2010). Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics, 86(2), 317-324.
21. Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., & Schubert, M. (2009). Incremental citation impact due to international co authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37-43.
22. Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31-43.
23. Katz, J., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
24. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311-316.
25. Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 481-489.
26. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438-443.
27. Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration: The Brazilian case. Scientometrics, 53(3), 325-335.
28. Lewinson, G., & Cunningham, P. (1991). Bibliometric studies for the evaluation of trans-domestic research. Scientometrics, 21(2), 223-244.
29. Luukkonen, T., Tijseen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.
30. Ma, N., & Guan, J. C. (2005). An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in Molecular Biology. Scientometrics, 65(3), 343-355.
31. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., Nederhof, A. J., & Tijssen, T. J. W. (1991). International scientific co operation and awareness within the European Community: Problems and perspectives. Scientometrics, 21(3), 291-311.
32. Molteni, V., & Zulueta, M. A. (2002). Análisis de la visibilidad internacional de la producción científica argentina en las Bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts and Humanities Citation Index de 1990-2000: Estudio bibliométrico. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 455-465.
33. Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., Hassan-Montero, Y., & Vargas-Quesada, B. (2008). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española: 2002-2006. Madrid: FECYT.
34. Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., González-Molina, A., et al. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53-78.
35. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europeand the citation of multidomestically authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313-323.
36. Pao, M. L. (1981). Coauthorship as communication measure. Library Research, 2, 327-338.
37. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432.
38. Price, D. J. S., & Beaver, D. B. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011-1018.
39. Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (2008). SCImago Research Group. Accessed 26 March, 2009 http://www. scimagojr. com/.
40. Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756-770.
41. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177-193.
42. Sudhier Pillai, K. G. (2007). Authorship patterns in physics literature: An informetric study on citations in doctoral theses of the Indian Institute of Science. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54, 90-94.
43. Zhao, Q., & Guan, J. (2011). International collaboration of three 'giants' with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87(1), 159-170.
44. Zuckerman, H. A. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 276-291.