International collaboration of three 'giants' with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals

Scientometrics

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 159-170

  Zhao, Qingjun ^a   Guan, Jiancheng ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

International collaboration; Nanobiopharmaceuticals; Small world

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951965652     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0311-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Calero, C., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Research cooperation within the bio-pharmaceutical industry: Network analyses of co-publications within and between firms. Scientometrics, 71(1), 87-99.
2. Chen, Z. F., & Guan, J. C. (2010). The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries. Journal of Informetrics, 4(2010), 97-106.
3. Feld, S. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035.
4. Frederiksen, L. F. (2004). Disciplinary determinants of bibliometric impact in Danish industrial research: Collaboration and visibility. Scientometrics, 61(2), 253-270.
5. Gaur, A., & Bhatia, A. L. (2008). Nanopharmaceuticals: An overview. Asian Journal of Experimental Sciences, 22(2), 51-62.
6. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
7. Gossart, C., & Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2), 323-345.
8. Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. (2007). China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience 'giants'. Research Policy, 36(6), 880-886.
9. Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology. An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507-527.
10. Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., & Schubert, M. (2009). Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37-43.
11. Jain, K. K. (2008). The handbook of nanomedicine. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
12. Jin, B. H., & Rousseau, R. (2005). China's quantitative expansion phase: Exponential growth but low impact. In Proceedings of ISSI 2005: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vols. 1-2, pp. 362-370), Stockholm, Sweden.
13. Kim, M. J. (2001). A bibliometric analysis of physics publications in Korea, 1994-1998. Scientometrics, 50(3), 503-521.
14. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311-316.
15. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438-443.
16. Lenoir, T., & Herron, P. (2009). Tracking the current rise of Chinese pharmaceutical bionanotechnology. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 4, 8.
17. National Science Board (NSB). (2006). Science & Engineering Indicators, Arlington, VA.
18. OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Source OECD, p. 66.
19. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633-650.
20. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5-6), 281-291.
21. Takeda, Y., Mae, S., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 80(1), 25-40.
22. Watts, D. J. (1999). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83-104.