Open innovation in global networks

Open Innovation in Global Networks

Volumn 9789264047693, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-127

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957754777     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1787/9789264047693-en     Document Type: Book

References (95)

1. Acha, V. (2007), "Open by Design: The Role of Design in Open Innovation", mimeo.
2. Adviesraad voor Wetenschaps-en Technologiebeleid (AWT) (2006), Opening van Zaken: Beleid voor Open Innovatie, Advies nr. 68, The Hague.
3. Anderson, P. and M. L. Tushman (1990), "Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 604-633.
4. Athreye, S. and J. Cantwell (2006), Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers?, Open University UK.
5. Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg and P. Maskel (2004), "Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation", Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 28, No. 1, p. 31-56.
6. British Technology Group (BTG) (1998), IPR Benchmark Study.
7. Ceccagnoli, M., A. Gambardella, P. Giuri, G. Licht and M. Mariani (2005), "Study on Evaluating the Knowledge Economy - What are Patents Actually Worth?", Report for the European Commission Brussels.
8. Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Chesbrough, H. (2006), Open Business Models, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
10. Chesbrough, H. and D. J. Teece (1996), "Organizing for Innovation: When is Virtual Virtuous?", Harvard Business Review.
11. Cooke, Ph. (2005), "Regionally Asymmetric Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation", Research Policy 34, p. 1128-1149.
12. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152.
13. Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson and J. P. Walsh (2002), "R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States", Research Policy, 31, 1349-1367.
14. Coombs, R. and A. Richards (1994), "Research on Technology Management in Enterprises: Issues for Community Policy, Case Study on England", Brussels.
15. Criscuolo, P., R. Narula and B. Verspagen (2005). "Role of Home and Host Country Innovation Systems in R&D Internationalisation: A Patent Citation Analysis", Economics of Innovation & New Technology, Vol. 14, pp. 417-433.
16. Dahlander, L. and D. Gann (2007), "How Open is Innovation", paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2007.
17. Docherty, M. (2006), "Primer on Open Innovation: Principles and Practice", mimeo.
18. Dunning, J. and R. Narula (1995), "The R&D Activities of Foreign Firms in the US", International Studies of Management and Organisation, 25, pp. 39-73.
19. EIRMA (2003), Innovation through Spinning In and Out, WG60 Report, Paris.
20. EIRMA (2004), Technology Access for Open Innovation, WG63 Report, Paris.
21. European Commission (2005a). Annual Digest of Industrial Research, Background Document.
22. European Commission (2005b), Study on Evaluating the Knowledge Economy - What are Patents Actually Worth?, Brussels.
23. Forrester Research Inc. (2004), Innovation Networks, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June.
24. Frost, Th. (2001), "The Geographic Sources of Foreign Subsidiaries' Innovation", Strategic Management Journal, 22, 101-124.
25. Gambardella, A. (2005), "Assessing the Market for Technology in Europe", presentation at EPO-OECD-BMWA International Conference on Intellectual Property as an Economic Asset: Key Issues in Valuation and Exploitation, 30 June-1 July, Berlin.
26. Gassmann, O. (2006), "Opening up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda", R&D Management 36(3), p. 223-228.
27. Gassmann, O. and E. Enkel (2004), "Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes", paper presented at the R&D Management Conference.
28. Hakanson, L. and R. Nobel (1993), "Foreign Research and Development in Swedish Multinationals", Research Policy, Vol. 22, pp. 373-396.
29. Herstad, S. (2007), "Global Open Innovation: Market Learning, Related Variety and the Global-Local Interplay in Norwegian Industry", NIFU STEP report.
30. INSEAD and Booz, Allen & Hamilton (2006), Innovation: Is Global the Way Forward?, INSEAD, Fontainebleau.
31. JPO (2004), Results of the Survey on Intellectual Property-Related Activities, 2003, JPO, Tokyo.
32. Kuemmerle, W. (1997), "Building Effective R&D Capabilities Abroad", Harvard Business Review, March-April 1997, pp. 61-70.
33. Lam, A. (2000), "Tacit Knowledge, Organisational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework", Organisation Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 487-513.
34. Laursen, K. and A. Salter (2006), "Open for Innovation: the Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U. K. Manufacturing Firms", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 131-150.
35. Lundvall, B. A. (1992) (ed.), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.
36. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (1993), "Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior", Industrial and Corporate Change 2(1), pp. 45-71.
37. Miotti, L and F. Sachwald (2003), "Co-operative R&D: Why and With Whom? An Integrated Framework of Analysis", Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1481-1499.
38. Nelson, R. R. (1993) (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
40. OECD (2006), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, Paris.
41. OECD (2007a), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, OECD, Paris.
42. OECD (2007b), Staying Competitive in the Global Economy: Moving Up the Value Chain, OECD, Paris.
43. OECD (2007c), "Intellectual Assets and International Investments: A Stocktaking of the Evidence", internal working document.
44. OECD (2008), The Internationalisation of Business Research: Evidence, Impacts and Implications, OECD, Paris.
45. O'Mahoney, S. (2003), "Guarding the Commons: How Community managed Software Projects for Their Work", Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1179-1198.
46. Pearce, R. and S. Singh (1992), "Internationalisation of R&D among the World's Leading Enterprises: Survey Analysis of Organisation and Motivation", pp. 137-162 in O. Grandstrand, L. Hakanson and S. Sjolander (eds.), Technology Management and International Business, Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
47. Roland Berger (2005), "Applicant Panel Survey 2004 of Intentions for Filing Patent Applications at the European Patent Office and Other Offices".
48. Ronstadt, R. C. (1978), "International R&D: The Establishment and Evolution of Research and Development Abroad by Seven US Multinationals, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 7-24.
49. Rothwell, R. (1991), "Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s". Extended version of a paper presented to the Science Policy Research Unit's 25th Anniversary Conference, Brighton.
50. Rothwell, P. (1993), "The Fifth Generation Innovation Process", in K. H. Oppenlander, Privates und Staatliches Innovationsmanagement, Munich.
51. Roussel, P. A., K. N. Saad and T. J. Erickson (1991), Third Generation R&D, Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy, Arthur D. Little, Boston.
52. Rugman, A. and T. Poynter (1982), "World Product Mandate: how will MNEs respond?", Business Quarterly.
53. Schwaag, S. (2006), "China, from Shop Floor to Knowledge Factory", pp. 227-266 in M. Karlsson (ed.), The Internationalization of Corporate R&D, Swedish Institute For Growth Policy Studies, Sweden.
54. Shapiro, C. (2001), "Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting", in Jaffe, A. et al. (eds.), NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy, 119-150, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
55. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2007), Sharing the Idea: the Emergence of Global Innovation Networks, London.
56. Thursby, J; and M. Thursby (2006), "Why Firms Conduct R&D Where They Do", Research Technology Management, Vol. 49, Issue 3.
57. Tidd, J. (2006), "A Review of Innovation Models", Discussion Paper 1, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London.
58. UNCTAD (2005), World Investment Report. Transnational Corporations and the Internationalisation of R&D. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
59. Von Hippel, E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
60. West, J. (2003), "How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies", Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1258-1286.
61. Anand, B. N. and T. Khanna (2000), "The Structure of Licensing Contracts", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 103-135.
62. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella (2001), Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
63. Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press.
64. De Jong, J. P. J. (2006), Meer Open Innovatie: Praktijk, Ontwikkelingen, Motieven en Knelpunten in het MKB, EIM, Zoetermeer.
65. Gambardella, A. (2005), "Assessing the Market for Technology in Europe", presentation at EPO-OECD-BMWA International Conference on Intellectual Property as an Economic Asset: Key Issues in Valuation and Exploitation, 30 June-1 July, Berlin.
66. Gassmann, O. and E. Enkel (2004), "Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes", paper presented at the R&D Management Conference.
67. Hagedoorn, J. (2002), "Inter-firm R&D Partnerships: An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns since 1960", Research Policy, Vol. 31, No 3, p. 477-492.
68. INSEAD and Booz, Allen & Hamilton (2006), Innovation: Is Global the Way Forward?, INSEAD, Fontainebleau.
69. Miotti, L and F. Sachwald (2003), "Co-operative R&D: Why and With Whom? An Integrated Framework of Analysis", Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1481-1499.
70. Motohashi, K. (2005), "Understanding Technology Market: Quantitative Analysis of Licensing Activities in Japan", presentation at the EPO-OECD-BMWA International Conference on Intellectual Property as an Economic Asset: Key Issues in Valuation and Exploitation, 30 June-1 July, Berlin.
71. OECD (2004), Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges, OECD, Paris.
72. OECD (2006), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, Paris.
73. OECD (2007), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, OECD, Paris.
74. OECD (2008), The Internationalisation of Business Research: Evidence, Impacts and Implications, OECD, Paris.
75. Rivette, K. G. and D. Kline (2000), Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.
76. Sheehan, J., C. Martinez and D. Guellec (2004), "Understanding Business Patenting and Licensing: Results of a Survey", Chapter 4, in Patents, Innovation and Economic Performance, Proceedings of an OECD Conference, OECD, Paris.
77. Thoma, G. and S. Torrisi (2007), "Creating Powerful Indicators for Innovation Studies with Approximate Matching Algorithms. A Test Based on PATSTAT and Amadeus Databases", December, available at www.epip. eu/datacentre.php.
78. Van Looy, B., M. du Plessis and T. Magerman (2006), "Data Production Methods for Harmonised Patent Indicators: Assignee Sector Allocation", EUROSTAT Working Paper and Studies.
79. Vonortas, N. S. and Y. J. Kim (2004), "Technology Licensing", chapter 10, in Patents, Innovation and Economic Performance, Proceedings of an OECD Conference, OECD, Paris.
80. Wurzer, A. (2005), "IP and Technology Intermediaries", presentation at EPO-OECD-BMWA International Conference on Intellectual Property as an Economic Asset: Key Issues in Valuation and Exploitation, 30 June-1 July, Berlin.
81. Abernathy, W. and Utterback J. (1978), "Patterns of Industrial Innovation", Technology Review 80(7), p. 40-47.
82. Beckman, C., P. Haunschild and D. Phillips (2004), "Friends or Strangers? Firm-specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection", Organisation Science 15(3), p. 259-275.
83. Beije, P. and K. Dittrich (2008), "Developing a Research Framework for Sectoral Modes of Open Innovation", submitted to International Journal of Technology Management
84. Doz, Y., J. Santos, P. Williamson (2001), From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
85. Herstad, S. (2007), "Global Open Innovation: Market Learning, Related Variety and the Global-Local Interplay in Norwegian Industry", NIFU STEP report.
86. Leiponen A; and I. Drejer (2007), "What Exactly are Technological Regimes? Intraindustry Heterogeneity in the Organisation of Innovation Activities", Research Policy 36, p. 1221-1238.
87. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (1993), "Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior", Industrial and Corporate Change 2(1), pp. 45-71.
88. Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
89. OECD (2008), The Internationalisation of Business Research: Evidence, Impacts and Implications, OECD, Paris.
90. Sachwald, F. (2007), "Location Choices within Global Innovation Networks: The Case of Europe", Journal of Technology Transfer.
91. Sood A. and G. Tellis (2005), "Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation", Journal of Marketing 69, pp. 152-168.
92. Teece D. (1986), "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy", Research Policy 15, pp. 285-305.
93. Thursby, J; and M. Thursby (2006). "Why Firms Conduct R&D Where They Do", Research Technology Management, Vol. 49, Issue 3.
94. Utterback, J. M. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
95. Van Looy, B., M. du Plessis and T. Magerman (2006), "Data Production Methods for Harmonised Patent Indicators: Assignee Sector Allocation", EUROSTAT Working Paper and Studies.