How do people judge risks: Availability heuristic, affect heuristic, or both?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 314-330

  Pachur, Thorsten ^a   Hertwig, Ralph ^a,b   Steinmann, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Affect heuristic; Availability heuristic; Dread; Risk perception; Value of a statistical life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PERCEPTION; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84873732807     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028279     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Betsch, T., & Pohl, D. (2002). Tversky and Kahneman's availability approach to frequency judgement: A critical analysis. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), Etc.: Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 109-119). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Breckenridge, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2006). The strategy of terrorism and the psychology of mass-mediated fear. In B. Bongar, L. Beutler, L. M. Brown, J. N. Breckenridge, & P. G. Zimbardo (Eds.), Psychology and terrorism. (pp. 116-133). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Brown, N. R., & Siegler, R. S. (1993). Metrics and mappings: A framework for understanding real-world quantitative estimation. Psychological Review, 100, 511-534. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.511
4. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217. doi: 10.1037/h0047470
6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Combs, B., & Slovic, P. (1979). Causes of death: Biased newspaper coverage and biased judgments. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 837-849. doi:10.1177/107769907905600420
8. Dhami, M. K., Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 959-988. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.959
9. Eisenman, R. (1993). Belief that drug usage in the United States is increasing when it is really decreasing: An example of the availability heuristic. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 249-252.
10. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 159-168. doi:10.1007/BF00992253
11. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
12. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
13. Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M., Lerner, J. S., & Small, D. A. (2005). Evolving judgments of terror risks: Foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 124-139. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.124
14. Fischhoff, B., & MacGregor, D. (1983). Judged lethality: How much people seem to know depends upon how they are asked. Risk Analysis, 3, 229-236. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1983.tb01391.x
15. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127-152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739
16. Folkes, V. S. (1988). The availability heuristic and perceived risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 13-23. doi:10.1086/209141
17. Gigerenzer, G., & Richter, H. R. (1990). Context effects and their interaction with development: Area judgments. Cognitive Development, 5, 235-264. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(90)90017-N
18. Hertwig, R., Pachur, T., & Kurzenhäuser, S. (2005). Judgments of risk frequencies: Tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 621-642. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.621
19. Hills, T. T., & Pachur, T. (2012). Dynamic search and working memory in social recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 218-228. doi:10.1037/a0025161
20. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326
21. Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20-31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20
22. Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1984). Representations of perceptions of risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 55-70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.55
23. Jones, S. K., Jones, K. T., & Frisch, D. (1995). Biases of probability assessment: A comparison of frequency and single-case judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 109-122. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1009
24. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
25. Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26, 631-639. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x
26. Länder vernichten Millionen Dosen H1N1-Impfstoff. (2011, November). Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/medizin/0,1518,799993,00.html
27. Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144-150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433
28. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473-493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763
29. Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551-578. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551
30. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, E. S. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
31. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated-measures data in cognitive research: A comparison of three different methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149
32. Meyer, P. (1990). News-media responsiveness to public health. In C. Atkin & L. Wallack (Eds.), Mass communication and public health (pp. 52-59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
34. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2004). Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Psychological Science, 15, 100-105. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502005.x
35. Pachur, T. (2010). Recognition-based inference: When is less more in the real world? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 589-598. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.4.589
36. Pachur, T. (2011). The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 413-422.
37. Pachur, T., & Galesic, M. (in press). Strategy selection in risky choice: The impact of numeracy, affect, and cross-cultural differences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1757
38. Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2006). On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 983-1002. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.983
39. Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (in press). The mind as an intuitive pollster: Frugal search in social spaces. In R. Hertwig, U. Hoffrage, and the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics in a social world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40. Park, J. S., & Grow, J. M. (2008). The social reality of depression: DTC advertising of antidepressants and perceptions of the prevalence and lifetime risk of depression. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 379-393. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9403-7
41. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195
42. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
43. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft, Bundesamt für Statistik. (2007). Todesursachenstatistik: Ursachen der Sterblichkeit 2003 und 2004. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Author. The shaming of America. (2005, Sept 8). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/4370617
44. Sjöberg, L. (2007). Emotions and risk perception. Risk Management, 9, 222-237. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250038
45. Sjöberg, L., & Engelberg, E. (2010). Risk perception and movies: A study of availability as a factor in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 30, 95-106. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01335.x
46. Slovic, P. (1986). Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis, 6, 403-415. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00953.x
47. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
48. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London, UK: Earthscan.
49. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the risks. Environment, 21, 14-39. doi:10.1080/00139157.1979.9933091
51. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In R. Schwing & W. A. Albers, Jr. (Eds.), Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? (pp. 181-214). New York, NY: Plenum.
52. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. In R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology. (pp. 91-125). Boulder, CO: Westview.
53. Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271-296. doi:10.1023/A: 1005595519944
54. Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322-325. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
55. Small, D., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143-153. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
56. Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1-26. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003
57. Sullivan, R., Peppercorn, J., Sikora, K., Zalcberg, J., Meropol, N. J., Amir, E.,Aapro, M. (2011). Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncology, 12, 933-980. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70141-3
58. Sunstein, C. R. (2002). Risk and reason: Safety, law, and the environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155-181. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155
60. Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., Weinstein, M. C., & Graham, J. D. (1995). Five hundred life-saving interventions and their cost effectiveness. Risk Analysis, 15, 369-390. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x
61. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286. doi:10.1037/h0070288
62. Tsai, C. I., & Thomas, M. (2011). When does feeling of fluency matter? How abstract and concrete thinking influence fluency effects. Psychological Science, 22, 348-354. doi:10.1177/0956797611398494
63. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
64. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
65. Tyler, T. R., & Cook, F. L. (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693-708. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.693
66. Watkins, M. J., & LeCompte, D. (1991). Inadequacy of recall as a basis for frequency knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1161-1176. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1161
67. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591-615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506
68. Zanuck, R. D. (Producer), Brown, D. (Producer), & Spielberg, S. (Director). (1975). Jaws [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.