Needs assessment for simulation training in neuroendoscopy: A Canadian national survey ; Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 250-257

  Haji, Faizal A ^a,b,c,d   Dubrowski, Adam ^c,d   Drake, James ^d   De Ribaupierre, Sandrine ^a,b  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy; Needs assessment; Simulation based medical education

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENDOSCOPIC THIRD VENTRICULOSTOMY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NEUROENDOSCOPY; NEUROSURGEON; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIMULATION; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CANADA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MEDICAL ERRORS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NEUROENDOSCOPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; THIRD VENTRICLE; VENTRICULOSTOMY;

EID: 84873662609     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 19330693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS12767     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA III, et al: Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797-804, 2007.
2. Alaraj A, Lemole MG, Finkle JH, Yudkowsky R, Wallace A, Luciano C, et al: Virtual reality training in neurosurgery: review of current status and future applications. Surg Neurol Int 2:52, 2011.
3. Bernstein M, Hamstra SJ, Woodrow S, Goldsman S, Reznick RK, Fairholm D: Needs assessment of neurosurgery trainees: a survey study of two large training programs in the developing and developed worlds. Surg Neurol 66:117-126, 2006.
4. Boszczyk BM, Mooij JJ, Schmitt N, Di Rocco C, Fakouri BB, Lindsay KW: Spine surgery training and competence of European neurosurgical trainees. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151: 619-628, 2009.
5. Bouras T, Sgouros S: Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. A review. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:643-649, 2011.
6. Bouras T, Sgouros S: Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir Suppl 113:149-153, 2012.
7. Cusimano MD: Virtual reality surgery: neurosurgery and the contemporary landscape a three-dimensional interactive virtual dissection model to simulate transpetrous surgical avenues. Neurosurgery 53:1010-1012, 2003 (Letter).
8. de Boer PG, Buckley R, Schmidt P, Fox R, Jupiter J: Learning assessment toolkit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1325-1329, 2010.
9. de Ribaupierre S, Rilliet B, Vernet O, Regli L, Villemure JG: Third ventriculostomy vs ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric obstructive hydrocephalus: results from a Swiss series and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 23:527-533, 2007.
10. Drake JM: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the Canadian experience. Neurosurgery 60:881-886, 2007.
11. Drake JM: The surgical management of pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 62 (Suppl 2):633-642, 2008.
12. Dvorak MF, Collins BJ, Murnaghan L, Hurlbert RJ, Fehlings M, Fox R, et al: Confidence in spine training among senior neurosurgical and orthopedic residents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:831-837, 2006.
13. Ersahin Y, Arslan D: Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 24:943-948, 2008.
14. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, et al: Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518-528, 2004.
15. Fried MP, Satava R, Weghorst S, Gallagher AG, Sasaki C, Ross D, et al: Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation. Qual Saf Health Care 13 (Suppl 1):i19-i26, 2004.
16. Gallagher AG, Cates CU: Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting: what this means for procedural-based medicine. JAMA 292:3024-3026, 2004.
17. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P: Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146-150, 2004.
18. Haase J, Boisen E: Neurosurgical training: more hours needed or a new learning culture? Surg Neurol 72:89-97, 2009.
19. Hailong F, Guangfu H, Haibin T, Hong P, Yong C, Weidong L, et al: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of communicating hydrocephalus: a preliminary study. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 109:923-930, 2008.
20. Jones RF, Stening WA, Brydon M: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86-92, 1990.
21. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds): Errors in health care: a leading cause of death and injury, in: To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000, pp 26-48.
22. Kolozsvari NO, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Demyttenaere S, Hoover ML: Sim one, do one, teach one: considerations in designing training curricula for surgical simulation. J Surg Educ 68:421-427, 2011.
23. Lockyer J: Getting started with needs assessment: Part 1-the questionnaire. J Contin Educ Health Prof 18:58-61, 1998.
24. Long DM: Neurosurgical training at present and in the next century. Acta Neurochir Suppl 69:58-64, 1997.
25. Malone HR, Syed ON, Downes MS, D'Ambrosio AL, Quest DO, Kaiser MG: Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery 67:1105-1116, 2010.
26. Mazzola CA, Lobel DA, Krishnamurthy S, Bloomgarden GM, Benzil DL: Efficacy of neurosurgery resident education in the new millennium: the 2008 Council of State Neurosurgical Societies post-residency survey results. Neurosurgery 67: 225-233, 2010.
27. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB: Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 86:706-711, 2011.
28. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ: A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 44:50-63, 2010.
29. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A: Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327:1032-1037, 2003.
30. Navarro R, Gil-Parra R, Reitman AJ, Olavarria G, Grant JA, Tomita T: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: early and late complications and their avoidance. Childs Nerv Syst 22:506-513, 2006.
31. Paas FG: Training strategies for attaining transfer of problemsolving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. J Educ Psychol 84:429-434, 1992.
32. Paas FG, Van Merriënboer JJ, Adam JJ: Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Percept Mot Skills 79:419-430, 1994.
33. Popp AJ: Navigating the Strait of Magellan: mapping a new paradigm for neurosurgical residency training. Presidential Address to the Society of Neurological Surgeons, May 7, 2007. J Neurosurg 109:576-582, 2008.
34. Ratnapalan S, Hilliard RI: Needs assessment in postgraduate medical education: a review. Med Educ Online 7:1-8, 2002.
35. Reznick RK, MacRae H: Teaching surgical skills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664-2669, 2006.
36. Sandelowski M: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23:334-340, 2000.
37. Schroeder HWS, Niendorf WR, Gaab MR: Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 96:1032- 1040, 2002.
38. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, et al: Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191:272-283, 2000.
39. Seymour NE: VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 32:182-188, 2008.
40. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Andersen DK, Satava RM: Analysis of errors in laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 18:592-595, 2004.
41. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, et al: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, doubleblinded study. Ann Surg 236:458-464, 2002.
42. Spicer MA, Apuzzo MLJ: Virtual reality surgery: neurosurgery and the contemporary landscape. Neurosurgery 52: 489-497, 2003.
43. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM: Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room- A randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115-120, 2010.
44. Stefanidis D: Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surg Clin North Am 90: 475-489, 2010.