The FtsK family of DNA pumps

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 767, Issue , 2013, Pages 245-262

  Demarre, Gaëlle ^a   Galli, Elisa ^a   Barre, François Xavier ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; FTSK PROTEIN; KINESIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; SPOIIIE PROTEIN; TRAB PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BACTERIAL DNA; DNA; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIUM CONJUGATION; CAULOBACTER CRESCENTUS; CELL DIVISION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CYTOSKELETON; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; DNA TRANSLOCATION; DNA TRANSPORT; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE TRANSLOCATION; HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID TRANSPORT; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN POLYMERIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SISTER CHROMATID; SPOROGENESIS; TYPE IV SECRETION SYSTEM; ULTRACENTRIFUGATION; VIBRIO CHOLERAE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL CHROMOSOME; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; DNA HELIX; DNA TRANSFER; EUBACTERIUM; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; STREPTOMYCES; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CELL MEMBRANE; DNA; DNA, BACTERIAL; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS;

EID: 84873642146     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5037-5_12     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. Mitosis: a history of division. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(1):E17-21.
2. Bouet JY, Nordstrom K, Lane D. Plasmid partition and incompatibility-the focus shifts. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65(6):1405-14.
3. Schumacher MA. Structural biology of plasmid partition: uncovering the molecular mechanisms of DNA segregation. Biochem J. 2008;412(1):1-18.
4. Wu LJ, Lewis PJ, Allmansberger R, Hauser PM, Errington J. A conjugation-like mechanism for prespore chromosome partitioning during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 1995;9(11):1316-26.
5. Wu LJ, Errington J. Bacillus subtilis spoIIIE protein required for DNA segregation during asymmetric cell division. Science. 1994;264(5158):572-5.
6. Barre FX, et al. FtsK functions in the processing of a Holliday junction intermediate during bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 2000;14(23):2976-88.
7. Steiner W, Liu G, Donachie WD, Kuempel P. The cytoplasmic domain of FtsK protein is required for resolution of chromosome dimers. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31(2):579-83.
8. Possoz C, Ribard C, Gagnat J, Pernodet JL, Guerineau M. The integrative element pSAM2 from Streptomyces: kinetics and mode of conjugal transfer. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42(1):159-66.
9. Vogelmann J, et al. Conjugal plasmid transfer in Streptomyces resembles bacterial chromosome segregation by FtsK/SpoIIIE. EMBO J. 2011;30(11):2246-54.
10. Dubarry N, Barre FX. Fully ef fi cient chromosome dimer resolution in Escherichia coli cells lacking the integral membrane domain of FtsK. EMBO J. 2010;29(3):597-605.
11. Burton BM, Marquis KA, Sullivan NL, Rapoport TA, Rudner DZ. The ATPase SpoIIIE transports DNA across fused septal membranes during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Cell. 2007;131(7):1301-12.
12. Fleming TC, et al. Dynamic SpoIIIE assembly mediates septal membrane fi ssion during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Genes Dev. 2010;24(11):1160-72.
13. Saleh OA, Bigot S, Barre FX, Allemand JF. Analysis of DNA supercoil induction by FtsK indicates translocation without groove-tracking. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12(5):436-40.
14. Bigot S, et al. KOPS: DNA motifs that control E. coli chromosome segregation by orienting the FtsK translocase. EMBO J. 2005;24(21):3770-80.
15. Ptacin JL, et al. Sequence-directed DNA export guides chromosome translocation during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15(5):485-93.
16. Levy O, et al. Identification of oligonucleotide sequences that direct the movement of the Escherichia coli FtsK translocase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(49):17618-23.
17. Becker EC, Pogliano K. Cell-speci fi c SpoIIIE assembly and DNA translocation polarity are dictated by chromosome orientation. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(5):1066-79.
18. Piggot PJ, Hilbert DW. Sporulation of Bacillus subtilis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7(6):579-86.
19. Wu LJ, Errington J. Septal localization of the SpoIIIE chromosome partitioning protein in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J. 1997;16(8):2161-9.
20. Bath J, Wu LJ, Errington J, Wang JC. Role of bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE in DNA transport across the mother cell-prespore division septum. Science. 2000;290(5493):995-7.
21. Ben-Yehuda S, Rudner DZ, Losick R. Assembly of the SpoIIIE DNA translocase depends on chromosome trapping in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Biol. 2003;13(24):2196-200.
22. Sharp MD, Pogliano K. Role of cell-speci fi c SpoIIIE assembly in polarity of DNA transfer. Science. 2002;295(5552):137-9.
23. Sharp MD, Pogliano K. MinCD-dependent regulation of the polarity of SpoIIIE assembly and DNA transfer. EMBO J. 2002;21(22):6267-74.
24. Sharp MD, Pogliano K. An in vivo membrane fusion assay implicates SpoIIIE in the fi nal stages of engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(25):14553-8.
25. Sharp MD, Pogliano K. The membrane domain of SpoIIIE is required for membrane fusion during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(6):2005-8.
26. Liu NJ, Dutton RJ, Pogliano K. Evidence that the SpoIIIE DNA translocase participates in membrane fusion during cytokinesis and engulfment. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(4):1097-113.
27. Reuther J, Gekeler C, Tiffert Y, Wohlleben W, Muth G. Unique conjugation mechanism in mycelial streptomycetes: a DNA-binding ATPase translocates unprocessed plasmid DNA at the hyphal tip. Mol Microbiol. 2006;61(2):436-46.
28. Val M-E, et al. FtsK-dependent dimer resolution on multiple chromosomes in the pathogen Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(9):e1000201.
29. Kono N, Arakawa K, Tomita M. Comprehensive prediction of chromosome dimer resolution sites in bacterial genomes. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):19.
30. Begg KJ, Dewar SJ, Donachie WD. A new Escherichia coli cell division gene, ftsK. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(21):6211-22.
31. Di Lallo G, Fagioli M, Barionovi D, Ghelardini P, Paolozzi L. Use of a two-hybrid assay to study the assembly of a complex multicomponent protein machinery: bacterial septosome differentiation. Microbiology. 2003;149(Pt 12):3353-9.
32. Yu XC, Tran AH, Sun Q, Margolin W. Localization of cell division protein FtsK to the Escherichia coli septum and identification of a potential N-terminal targeting domain. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(5):1296-304.
33. Wang L, Lutkenhaus J. FtsK is an essential cell division protein that is localized to the septum and induced as part of the SOS response. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29(3):731-40.
34. Liu G, Draper GC, Donachie WD. FtsK is a bifunctional protein involved in cell division and chromosome localization in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29(3):893-903.
35. Draper GC, McLennan N, Begg K, Masters M, Donachie WD. Only the N-terminal domain of FtsK functions in cell division. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(17):4621-7.
36. Chen JC, Beckwith J. FtsQ, FtsL and FtsI require FtsK, but not FtsN, for co-localization with FtsZ during Escherichia coli cell division. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42(2):395-413.
37. Geissler B, Margolin W. Evidence for functional overlap among multiple bacterial cell division proteins: compensating for the loss of FtsK. Mol Microbiol. 2005;58(2):596-612.
38. Dubarry N, Possoz C, Barre FX. Multiple regions along the Escherichia coli FtsK protein are implicated in cell division. Mol Microbiol. 2010;78(1088-1100):1088-100.
39. Lesterlin C, Pages C, Dubarry N, Dasgupta S, Cornet F. Asymmetry of chromosome Replichores renders the DNA translocase activity of FtsK essential for cell division and cell shape maintenance in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(12):e1000288.
40. Yu XC, Weihe EK, Margolin W. Role of the C terminus of FtsK in Escherichia coli chromosome segregation. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(23):6424-8.
41. Bigot S, Corre J, Louarn J, Cornet F, Barre FX. FtsK activities in Xer recombination, DNA mobilization and cell division involve overlapping and separate domains of the protein. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54(4):876-86.
42. Recchia GD, Aroyo M, Wolf D, Blakely G, Sherratt DJ. FtsK-dependent and -independent pathways of Xer site-speci fi c recombination. EMBO J. 1999;18(20):5724-34.
43. Deghorain M, et al. A defined terminal region of the E. coli chromosome shows late segregation and high FtsK activity. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22164.
44. Capiaux H, Lesterlin C, Perals K, Louarn JM, Cornet F. A dual role for the FtsK protein in Escherichia coli chromosome segregation. EMBO Rep. 2002;3(6):532-6.
45. Perals K, Cornet F, Merlet Y, Delon I, Louarn JM. Functional polarization of the Escherichia coli chromosome terminus: the dif site acts in chromosome dimer resolution only when located between long stretches of opposite polarity. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36(1):33-43.
46. Bigot S, Saleh OA, Cornet F, Allemand JF, Barre FX. Oriented loading of FtsK on KOPS. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(11):1026-8.
47. Grainge I, Lesterlin C, Sherratt DJ. Activation of XerCD-dif recombination by the FtsK DNA translocase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(12):5140-8.
48. Yates J, et al. Dissection of a functional interaction between the DNA translocase, FtsK, and the XerD recombinase. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(6):1754-66.
49. Massey TH, Aussel L, Barre F-X, Sherratt DJ. Asymmetric activation of Xer site-speci fi c recombination by FtsK. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(4):399-404.
50. Yates J, Aroyo M, Sherratt DJ, Barre FX. Species specificity in the activation of Xer recombination at dif by FtsK. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(1):241-9.
51. Aussel L, et al. FtsK is a DNA motor protein that activates chromosome dimer resolution by switching the catalytic state of the XerC and XerD recombinases. Cell. 2002;108(2):195-205.
52. Nolivos S, Pages C, Rousseau P, Le Bourgeois P, Cornet F. Are two better than one? Analysis of an FtsK/Xer recombination system that uses a single recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(19):6477-89.
53. Nolivos S, et al. Co-evolution of segregation guide DNA motifs and the FtsK translocase in bacteria: identification of the atypical Lactococcus lactis KOPS motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:5535-45.
54. Kaimer C, Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Graumann PL. SpoIIIE and a novel type of DNA translocase, SftA, couple chromosome segregation with cell division in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74(4):810-25.
55. Biller SJ, Burkholder WF. The Bacillus subtilis SftA (YtpS) and SpoIIIE DNA translocases play distinct roles in growing cells to ensure faithful chromosome partitioning. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74(4):790-809.
56. Kaimer C, Schenk K, Graumann PL. Two DNA translocases synergistically affect chromosome dimer resolution in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(6):1334-40.
57. Grainge I, et al. Unlinking chromosome catenanes in vivo by site-speci fi c recombination. EMBO J. 2007;26(19):4228-38.
58. Ip SC, Bregu M, Barre FX, Sherratt DJ. Decatenation of DNA circles by FtsK-dependent Xer site-speci fi c recombination. EMBO J. 2003;22(23):6399-407.
59. Bigot S, Marians KJ. DNA chirality-dependent stimulation of topoisomerase IV activity by the C-terminal AAA+ domain of FtsK. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(9):3031-40.
60. Espeli O, Levine C, Hassing H, Marians KJ. Temporal regulation of topoisomerase IV activity in E. coli. Mol Cell. 2003;11(1):189-201.
61. Espeli O, Lee C, Marians KJ. A physical and functional interaction between Escherichia coli FtsK and topoisomerase IV. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(45):44639-44.
62. Wang SC, West L, Shapiro L. The bifunctional FtsK protein mediates chromosome partitioning and cell division in Caulobacter. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(4):1497-508.
63. Sivanathan V, et al. The FtsK gamma domain directs oriented DNA translocation by interacting with KOPS. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(11):965-72.
64. Massey TH, Mercogliano CP, Yates J, Sherratt DJ, Lowe J. Double-stranded DNA translocation: structure and mechanism of hexameric FtsK. Mol Cell. 2006;23:457-69.
65. Iyer LM, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Aravind L. Comparative genomics of the FtsK-HerA superfamily of pumping ATPases: implications for the origins of chromosome segregation, cell division and viral capsid packaging. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(17):5260-79.
66. Gomis-Ruth FX, et al. The bacterial conjugation protein TrwB resembles ring helicases and F1-ATPase. Nature. 2001;409(6820):637-41.
67. Saleh OA, Perals C, Barre FX, Allemand JF. Fast, DNA-sequence independent translocation by FtsK in a single-molecule experiment. EMBO J. 2004;23(12):2430-9.
68. Pease PJ, et al. Sequence-directed DNA translocation by puri fi ed FtsK. Science. 2005;307(5709):586-90.
69. Lee JY, Finkelstein IJ, Crozat E, Sherratt DJ, Greene EC. Single-molecule imaging of DNA curtains reveals mechanisms of KOPS sequence targeting by the DNA translocase FtsK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6531-6.
70. Marquis KA, et al. SpoIIIE strips proteins off the DNA during chromosome translocation. Genes Dev. 2008;22(13):1786-95.
71. Lau IF, et al. Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(3):731-43.
72. Bonne L, Bigot S, Chevalier F, Allemand JF, Barre FX. Asymmetric DNA requirements in Xer recombination activation by FtsK. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(7):2371-80.
73. Graham JE, Sherratt DJ, Szczelkun MD. Sequence-speci fi c assembly of FtsK hexamers establishes directional translocation on DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(47):20263-8.
74. Crozat E, et al. Separating speed and ability to displace roadblocks during DNA translocation by FtsK. EMBO J. 2010;29(8):1423-33.
75. Graham JE, Sivanathan V, Sherratt DJ, Arciszewska LK. FtsK translocation on DNA stops at XerCD-dif. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;38(1):72-81.
76. Lowe J, et al. Molecular mechanism of sequence-directed DNA loading and translocation by FtsK. Mol Cell. 2008;31(4):498-509.
77. Kennedy SP, Chevalier F, Barre FX. Delayed activation of Xer recombination at dif by FtsK during septum assembly in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(4):1018-28.
78. Enemark EJ, Joshua-Tor L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature. 2006;442(7100):270-5.
79. Cornet F, Louarn J, Patte J, Louarn JM. Restriction of the activity of the recombination site dif to a small zone of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Genes Dev. 1996;10(9):1152-61.
80. Mercier R, et al. The MatP/matS site-speci fi c system organizes the terminus region of the E. coli chromosome into a macrodomain. Cell. 2008;135(3):475-85.
81. Espeli O, Mercier R, Boccard F. DNA dynamics vary according to macrodomain topography in the E. coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(6):1418-27.
82. Lesterlin C, Mercier R, Boccard F, Barre FX, Cornet F. Roles for replichores and macrodomains in segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:557-62.
83. Valens M, Penaud S, Rossignol M, Cornet F, Boccard F. Macrodomain organization of the Escherichia coli chromosome. EMBO J. 2004;23(21):4330-41.
84. Meile JC, et al. The terminal region of the E. coli chromosome localises at the periphery of the nucleoid. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):28.
85. Corre J, Patte J, Louarn JM. Prophage lambda induces terminal recombination in Escherichia coli by inhibiting chromosome dimer resolution. An orientation-dependent cis-effect lending support to bipolarization of the terminus. Genetics. 2000;154(1):39-48.
86. Corre J, Louarn JM. Evidence from terminal recombination gradients that FtsK uses replichore polarity to control chromosome terminus positioning at division in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(14):3801-7.
87. Ptacin JL, Nollmann M, Bustamante C, Cozzarelli NR. Identification of the FtsK sequencerecognition domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(11):1023-5.
88. Spies M, et al. A molecular throttle: the recombination hotspot chi controls DNA translocation by the RecBCD helicase. Cell. 2003;114(5):647-54.
89. Taylor AF, Schultz DW, Ponticelli AS, Smith GR. RecBC enzyme nicking at Chi sites during DNA unwinding: location and orientation-dependence of the cutting. Cell. 1985;41(1):153-63.
90. Sourice S, Biaudet V, El Karoui M, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A. Identification of the Chi site of Haemophilus in fl uenzae as several sequences related to the Escherichia coli Chi site. Mol Microbiol. 1998;27(5):1021-9.
91. El Karoui M, et al. Orientation specificity of the Lactococcus lactis chi site. Genes Cells. 2000;5(6):453-61.
92. El Karoui M, Biaudet V, Schbath S, Gruss A. Characteristics of Chi distribution on different bacterial genomes. Res Microbiol. 1999;150(9-10):579- 87.
93. Dorazi R, Dewar SJ. Membrane topology of the N-terminus of the Escherichia coli FtsK division protein. FEBS Lett. 2000;478(1-2):13-8.
94. Barre FX. FtsK and SpoIIIE: the tale of the conserved tails. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(5):1051-5.
95. Perals K, et al. Interplay between recombination, cell division and chromosome structure during chromosome dimer resolution in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39(4):904-13.
96. Le Bourgeois P, et al. The unconventional Xer recombination machinery of Streptococci/ Lactococci. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(7):e117.
97. McCool JD, Sandler SJ. Effects of mutations involving cell division, recombination, and chromosome dimer resolution on a priA2::kan mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(15):8203-10.
98. Thanbichler M. Synchronization of chromosome dynamics and cell division in bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(1):a000331.