Metabolic Impact Assessment for urban planning

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 178-193

  Pinho, Paulo ^a   Oliveira, Vítor ^a   Cruz, Sara Santos ^a   Barbosa, Magda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

environmental planning; evaluation methodology; impact assessment; urban development; urban form; urban metabolism

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; URBAN AREA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN SYSTEM;

EID: 84873624860     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.657953     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abaza, H., Bisset, R. and Sadler, B. 2004. Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: towards an integrated approach, Geneve: UNEP.
2. Alexander, E. 2000. Rationality revisited: planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective. Journal of planning education and research, 19: 242-256.
3. Alexander, E. 2006. "Evolution and status: where is planning evaluation today and how did it get here?". In Evaluation and planning, evolution and prospects, Edited by: Alexander, E. 3-16. Aldershot: Ashgate.
4. Alexander, E. 2009. Dilemmas in evaluating planning, or back to basics: what is planning for?. Planning theory & practice, 10: 233-244.
5. Alexander, E. and Faludi, A. 1989. Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and planning B: planning & design, 16: 127-140.
6. Alterman, R. and Hill, M. 1978. Implementation of urban land use plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33: 274-285.
7. Altes, W. 2006. Stagnation in housing production: another success in the Dutch planner's paradise?. Environment and planning B: planning & design, 33: 97-114.
8. Baer, W. 1997. General plan evaluation criteria. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63: 329-344.
9. Berke, P. 2006. What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and planning B: planning & design, 33: 581-600.
10. Calkins, H. 1979. The planning monitor: an accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environment and planning A, 11: 745-758.
11. Canter, L. 1996. Environmental Impact Assessment, Colombus, OH: McGraw Hill.
12. Codoban, N. and Kennedy, C. 2008. The metabolism of neighbourhoods. ASCE journal of urban planning and development, 134: 21-31.
13. Eggenberger, M. and Partidário, M. 2000. Development of a framework to assist the integration of environmental, social and economic issues in planning. Impact assessment and project appraisal, 18: 201-207.
14. Fudge, C. and Barrett, S. 1981. "Reconstruction of the field of analysis". In Policy and action: essays on the implementation of public policy, Edited by: Barrett, S. and Fudge, C. 249-278. London: Methuen.
15. Garcia, G. 2008. "A step forward in the evaluation of urban metabolism: definition of urban typologies". In ConAccount 2008 urban metabolism: measuring the ecological city, Edited by: Havránek, M. 10-28. Prague: Charles University Environment Center.
16. Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A. 1994. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, London: UCL Press.
17. ICGPSIA (Inter-organizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment). 1994. Guidelines and principles for Social Impact Assessment, US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric National Marine Fisheries Service. [online] Available from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/social_impact_guide.htm [Accessed 31 December 2010]
18. Jay, S. 2007. Environmental Impact Assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment review, 27: 287-300.
19. Kennedy, C. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of industrial ecology, 11: 43-59.
20. Kozlowski, J. and Hughes, J. 1972. Threshold analysis, a quantitative planning method, London: The Architectural Press.
21. Lichfield, N. 1996. Community impact evaluation, London: UCL Press.
22. Malczewski, J. 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in planning, 62: 3-65.
23. Malisz, B. 1963. Threshold theory. Bulletin IUA, 16/7, Warsaw
24. McAllister, D. 1982. Evaluation in environmental planning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. McHarg, I. 1969. Design with nature, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. OECD. 2006. Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment: good practice guidance for development co-operation, DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris: OECD
27. Oliveira, V. and Pinho, P. 2009. Evaluating plans, processes and results. Planning theory & practice, 10: 35-63.
28. Osmond, P. 2008. An enquiry into new methodologies for evaluating sustainable urban form. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of South Wales.
29. Partidário, M. R. 2007a. Scales and associated data-what is enough for SEA needs?. Environmental Impact Assessment review, 27(5): 460-478.
30. Partidário, M. R. 2007b. Strategic Environmental Assessment good practice guidance: methodological guidance, Lisboa: Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente.
31. Pope, J., Annandale, D. and Morrison-Saunders, A. 2004. Conceptualizing sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment review, 24: 595-616.
32. Sheate, W. 2003. Integrating the environment into strategic decision making: conceptualizing policy SEA. European environment, 13: 1-18.
33. Sheperd, A. and Ortolano, L. 1996. Strategic Environmental Assessment for sustainable urban development. Environmental Impact Assessment, 16: 321-335.
34. Schremmer, C. 2010. "SUME-Sustainable Urban Metabolism for Europe". In Planning in times of uncertainty, Edited by: Pinho, P. and Oliveira, V. 33-48. Porto: FEUP Edições.
35. Talen, E. 1996b. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of planning literature, 10: 248-259.
36. Talen, E. 1997. Success, failure and conformance: an alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and planning B: planning & design, 24: 573-587.
37. UNEP. 2009. Integrated assessment: mainstreaming sustainability into policy-making. A guidance manual, Geneva: United Nations Environment Program.
38. Vanclay, F. 2003. International principles for Social Impact Assessment. Impact assessment and project appraisal, 21(1): 5-11.
39. Wackernagel, M. and Rees, E. 1995. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on Earth, Philadelphia: New Society.
40. Wang, L. and Xu, L. Environmental performance evaluation methods of urban energy utilization. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, 11-13 June 2009, Beijing.
41. Wolman, A. 1965. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213: 178-193.