Evaluating plans, processes and results

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 35-63

  Oliveira, Vítor ^a   Pinho, Paulo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Evaluation methodologies; Planning evaluation; Planning process; Urban plans

Indexed keywords

PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING PRACTICE; PLANNING PROCESS; URBAN PLANNING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; LISBOA [PORTUGAL]; LISBON; PORTO [PORTO (DST)]; PORTO [PORTUGAL]; PORTUGAL; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 67651039736     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649350802661741     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alexander, E. (2006) Evolution and status: Where is planning evaluation today and how did it get here?. Evaluation and Planning, Evolution and Prospects, pp. 3-16. Ashgate, Aldershot
2. Alexander, E. (2006) Problems and prospects: Dilemmas in evaluation and directions for the future. Evaluation and Planning, Evolution and Prospects, pp. 267-276. Ashgate, Aldershot
3. Alexander, E. and Faludi, A. (1989) Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 16:1, pp. 127-140.
4. Alterman, R. and Hill, M. (1978) Implementation of urban land use plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33:1, pp. 274-285.
5. Baer, W. (1997) General plan evaluation criteria. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63:3, pp. 329-344.
6. Berke, P., Backhurst, M., Day, M., Ericksen, N., Laurian, L., Crawford, J. and Dixon, J. (2006) What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zeland. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 33:4, pp. 581-600.
7. Brody, S. and Highfield, W. (2005) Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71:2, pp. 159-175.
8. Brody, S., Highfield, W. and Thornton, S. (2006) Planning at the urban fringe: An examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in Southern Florida. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 33:1, pp. 75-96.
9. Burby, R. (2003) Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69:1, pp. 33-49.
10. Calkins, H. (1979) The planning monitor: An accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environment and Planning A, 11:7, pp. 745-758.
11. Camara Municipal de Lisboa (1992) Plano Estrategico de Lisboa, Camara Municipal de Lisboa, Lisbon
12. Camara Municipal de Lisboa (1994) Plano Director Municipal de Lisboa, Camara Municipal de Lisboa, Lisbon
13. Camara Municipal de Lisboa (1998) Plano de Urbanizacao do alto do Lumar, Camara Municipal de Lisboa, Lisbon
14. Camara Municipal do Porto (2006) Plano Director Municipal do Porto, Camara Municipal do Porto, Oporto
15. Chapin, T., Doyle, R. and Baker, E. (2008) A parcel-based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land-use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35:2, pp. 261-729.
16. Deyle, R., Chapin, T. and Baker, E. (2008) The proof of the planning is in the platting: An evaluation of Florida's hurricane exposure mitigation planning mandate. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74:3, pp. 349-370.
17. European Commission (1999) MEANS Collection-Evaluating socio-economic programmes, Official Publications Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg
18. Faludi, A. (2000) The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15:4, pp. 299-318.
19. Faludi, A. (2001) The application of the European Spatial Development Perspective: Evidence from the north-west metropolitan area. European Planning Studies, 9:5, pp. 663-675.
20. Faludi, A. (2006) Evaluating plans: The application of the European Spatial Development Perspective. Evaluation and Planning, Evolution and Prospects, pp. 119-143. Ashgate, Aldershot
21. Faludi, A. and Korthals Altes, W. (1994) Evaluating communicative planning: A revised design for performance research. European Planning Studies, 2:4, pp. 403-418.
22. Ferreira, A. (2005) Gestao estrategica de cidades e regioes, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon
23. Fudge, C. and Barrett, S. (1981) Reconstruction of the field of analysis. Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy, pp. 249-278. Methuen, London
24. Hall, T. (2008) The form based development plan: Bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 12:2, pp. 77-96.
25. Hall, T. and Doe, J. (2000) Design control policies for small areas: The Dacorum residential area character study. Planning Theory and Practice, 1, pp. 235-256.
26. Khakee, A. (2000) Reading plans as an exercise in evaluation. Evaluation, 6:2, pp. 119-136.
27. Khakee, A. (2001) Drama democratic discourse policy statement: An evaluation of plan texts. Recent developments in evaluation, pp. 235-252. Geopress, Groningen
28. Korthals Altes, W. (2006) Stagnation in housing production: Another success in the Dutch planner's paradise?. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 33:1, pp. 97-114.
29. Kropf, K. (1996) An alternative approach to zoning in France: Typology, historical character and development control. European Planning Studies, 4:6, pp. 717-737.
30. Kropf, K. (1997) Typological zoning. Typological process and design theory, pp. 127-140. Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, Cambridge
31. Lange, M., Mastop, H. and Spit, T. (1997) Performance of national policies. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24:6, pp. 845-858.
32. Laurian, L., Day, M., Backhurst, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., Dixon, J. and Chapman, S. (2004) What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47:4, pp. 555-577.
33. Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J. and Dixon, J. (2004) Evaluating plan implementation. A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70:4, pp. 471-480.
34. Lichfield, N. (1996) Community Impact Evaluation, UCL Press, London
35. Lichfield, N. (2001) Where do we go from here?. Recent developments in evaluation, pp. 7-15. Geopress, Groningen
36. Lichfield, N. (2003) Planned development and its children. Planning Theory & Practice, 4:1, pp. 48-65.
37. Mandelbaum, S. (1990) Reading plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56:2, pp. 350-356.
38. Mastop, H. (1997) Performance in Dutch spatial planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24:6, pp. 807-813.
39. Mastop, H. and Faludi, A. (1997) Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24:6, pp. 815-832.
40. Mastop, H. and Needham, B. (1997) Performance studies in spatial planning: The state of the art. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24:6, pp. 881-888.
41. Norton, R. (2005) More and better local planning. A state-mandated local planning in Coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71:1, pp. 55-71.
42. Norton, R. (2005) Striking the balance between environment and economy in Coastal North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 4:2, pp. 177-207.
43. Norton, R. (2005) Local commitment to state-mandated planning in Coastal North Carolina. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25:2, pp. 149-171.
44. Oliveira, V. and Pinho, P. (2006) The study of urban form in Portugal: A comparative analysis of the cities of Lisbon and Oporto. Urban Design International, 11:3, pp. 187-201.
45. Oliveira, V. and Pinho, P. (2008) Urban form and municipal planning in Lisbon and Oporto: 1865-2005. Planning Perspectives, 23:1, pp. 81-105.
46. Oliveira, V. and Pinho, P. (2009) Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature
47. Rossi, P., Freeman, H. and Lipsey, M. (1999) Evaluation, a systematic approach, Sage, Thousand Oaks
48. Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (2005) Design code for the Rotherham town centre river corridor, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, Rotherham
49. Samuels, I. (1999) A typomorphological approach to design: The plan for St Gervais. Urban Design International, 4, pp. 129-141.
50. Stratford-on-Avon District Council (2001) Stratford-on-Avon District design guide, Stratford-on-Avon District Council, Stratford-on-Avon
51. Talen, E. (1996) After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16:1, pp. 79-91.
52. Talen, E. (1996) Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10:3, pp. 248-259.
53. Talen, E. (1997) Success, failure and conformance: An alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24:4, pp. 573-587.