The Role of Enhanced Recovery Pathways in the Setting of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 7-13

  Keller, Deborah S ^a   Delaney, Conor P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALVIMOPAN; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BISACODYL; DICLOFENAC; GABAPENTIN; HEPARIN; HYDROCORTISONE; HYDROMORPHONE; HYDROXYZINE EMBONATE; KETOROLAC; MACROGOL 3350; METOCLOPRAMIDE; MORPHINE; PARACETAMOL; PERCOCET; STEROID; TEMAZEPAM; ZOLPIDEM TARTRATE;

ARTICLE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EVENING DOSAGE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LUNG FUNCTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NAUSEA; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84873520124     PISSN: 10431489     EISSN: 15584585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2012.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. National Health Care Expenditures Data Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/tables.pdf.
2. The Path to a High Performance Health System: A 2020 Vision and the Policies to Pave the Way The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System. http://www.commonwealthfund.org.
3. Schilling P.L., Dimick J.B., Birkmeyer J.D. Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008, 207:698-704.
4. Longo W.E., Virgo K.S., Johnson F.E., et al. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:83-91.
5. Adamina M., Kehlet H., Tomlinson G.A., et al. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 2011, 149:830-840.
6. Delaney C.P., Zutshi M., Senagore A.J., et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:851-859.
7. Goodney P.P., Stukel T.A., Lucas F.L., et al. Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery. Ann Surg 2003, 238:161-167.
8. Delaney C.P., Chang E., Senagore A.J., et al. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 2008, 247:819-824.
9. Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 2008, 371:791-793.
10. Augestad K.M., Delaney C.P. Postoperative ileus: Impact of pharmacological treatment, laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery pathways. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16:2067-2074.
11. Basse L., Hjort Jakobsen D., Billesbølle P., et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000, 232:51-57.
12. Senagore A.J. Pathogenesis and clinical and economic consequences of postoperative ileus. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007, 64(Suppl 13):S3-S7.
13. Delaney C.P., Marcello P.W., Sonoda T., et al. Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colectomy: Results of a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:653-661.
14. Delaney C.P., Kiran R.P., Senagore A.J., et al. Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2003, 238:67-72.
15. Veldkamp R., Kuhry E., Hop W.C., et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group: Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 2005, 6:477-484.
16. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for Colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2050-2059. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group.
17. Delaney C.P. Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2008, 51:181-185.
18. Senagore A.J., Delaney C.P. A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: Lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 2006, 191:377-380.
19. Kariv Y., Delaney C.P., Senagore A.J., et al. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a "fast track" postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2007, 50:137-146.
20. Kariv Y., Wang W., Senagore A.J., et al. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. Am J Surg 2006, 191:364-371.
21. Azimuddin K., Rosen L., Reed J.F., et al. Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:942-946.
22. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Fast-track surgery. Br J Surg 2005, 92:3-4.
23. Wille-Jørgensen P., Guenaga K.F., Castro A.A., et al. Clinical value of preoperative mechanical bowel cleansing in elective colorectal surgery: A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:1013-1020.
24. Platell C., Hall J. What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery?. Dis Colon Rectum 1998, 41:875-882.
25. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008, 248:189-198.
26. Muller S., Zalunardo M.P., Hubner M., et al. Track Study Group: A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 2009, 136:842-847.
27. Hendry P.O., Hausel J., Nygren J., et al. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 2009, 96:197-205.
28. Kehlet H., Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 1999, 86:227-230.
29. Delaney C.P., Fazio V.W., Senagore A.J., et al. "Fast track" postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2001, 88:1533-1538.
30. Lassen K., Soop M., Nygren J., et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009, 144:961-969.
31. Wind J., Polle S.W., Fung K., et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 2006, 93:800-809.
32. Walter C.J., Collin J., Dumville J.C., et al. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2009, 11:344-353.
33. Spanjersberg W.R., Reurings J., Keus F., et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 2. CD007635.
34. Delaney C.P., Brady K., Woconish D., et al. Towards optimizing perioperative colorectal care: Outcomes for 1000 consecutive laparoscopic colon procedures using enhanced recovery pathways. Am J Surg 2012, 203:353-355. [discussion 355-356].
35. King P.M., Blazeby J.M., Ewings P., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 2006, 93:300-308.
36. Bardram L., Funch-Jensen P., Kehlet H. Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 2000, 87:1540-1545.
37. Poon J.T., Fan J.K., Lo O.S., et al. Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011, 26:71-77.
38. Vlug M.S., Wind J., Hollmann M.W., et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: A randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011, 254:868-875. LAFA Study Group.
39. Reurings J.C., Spanjersberg W.R., Oostvogel H.J., et al. A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laparoscopic fast track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study). BMC Surg 2010, 10:18.
40. Ludwig K., Enker W.E., Delaney C.P., et al. Gastrointestinal tract recovery in patients undergoing bowel resection: Results of a randomized trial of alvimopan and placebo with a standardized accelerated postoperative care pathway. Arch Surg 2008, 143:1098-1105.
41. Delaney C.P., Wolff B.G., Viscusi E.R., et al. Alvimopan, for postoperative ileus following bowel resection: A pooled analysis of phase III studies. Ann Surg 2007, 245:355-363.
42. Delaney C.P., Weese J.L., Hyman N.H., et al. Phase III trial of alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting, mu opioid antagonist, for postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48:1114-1125. [discussion:1125-1126]; [author reply:1127-1129].
43. Viscusi E.R., Goldstein S., Witkowski T., et al. Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery: Results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Surg Endosc 2006, 20:64-70.
44. Wolff B.G., Michelassi F., Gerkin T.M., et al. Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting mu opioid antagonist: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 2004, 240:728-734. [discussion 734-735].
45. Bell T.J., Poston S.A., Kraft M.D., et al. Economic analysis of alvimopan in North American phase III efficacy trials. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009, 66:1362-1368.
46. Obokhare I.D., Champagne B., Stein S.L., et al. The effect of alvimopan on recovery after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011, 54:743-746.
47. Counihan T.C., Favuzza J. Fast track colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009, 22:60-72.
48. Senagore A.J., Delaney C.P., Mekhail N., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg 2003, 90:1195-1199.
49. Zutshi M., Delaney C.P., Senagore A.J., et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 2005, 189:268-272.
50. Stuhldreher J.M., Adamina M., Konopacka A., et al. Effect of local anesthetics on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2011, 26:1617-1623.
51. Rafi A.N. Abdominal field block: A new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 2001, 56:1024-1026.
52. Bharti N., Kumar P., Bala I., et al. The efficacy of a novel approach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:1504-1508.
53. Favuzza J., Samia H., Brady K., et al. TAP blocks and enhanced recovery pathways: making 23 hour stay a realistic goal after laparoscopic colectomy. ASCRS 2012.
54. Hannemann P., Lassen K., Hausel J., et al. Patterns in current anaesthesiological peri-operative practice for colonic resections: A survey in five northern-European countries. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006, 50:1152-1160.
55. Joh Y.G., Lindsetmo R.O., Stulberg J., et al. Standardized postoperative pathway: Accelerating recovery after ileostomy closure. Dis Colon Rectum 2008, 51:1786-1789.
56. Kariv Y., Delaney C.P., Senagore A.J., et al. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a "fast track" postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2007, 50:137-146.
57. Walter C.J., Smith A., Guillou P. Perceptions of the application of fast-track surgical principles by general surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006, 88:191-195.
58. Lassen K., Hannemann P., Ljungqvist O., et al. Patterns in current perioperative practice: Survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ 2005, 330:1420-1421.
59. Delaney C.P., Senagore A.J., Gerkin T.M., et al. Association of surgical care practices with length of stay and use of clinical protocols after elective bowel resection: Results of a national survey. Am J Surg 2010, 199:299-304.
60. Maessen J., Dejong C.H., Hausel J., et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007, 94:224-231.
61. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002, 183:630-641.
62. Felch W.C. Bridging the gap between research and practice. The role of continuing medical education. JAMA 1997, 277:155-156.
63. Andersen J., Hjort-Jakobsen D., Christiansen P.S., et al. Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 2007, 94:890-893.
64. Jakobsen D.H., Sonne E., Andreasen J., et al. Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Col Dis 2006, 8:683-687.
65. Sammour T., Zargar-Shoshtari K., Bhat A., et al. A programme of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 2010, 123:61-70.
66. Wind J., Hofland J., Preckel B., et al. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; laparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 2006, 6:16.