Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 247, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 819-824

  Delaney, Conor P ^a   Chang, Eunice ^b   Senagore, Anthony J ^c   Broder, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTH ANALYTIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COLON CANCER; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; COLECTOMY; COLONIC DISEASES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH RESOURCES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 42549094021     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d950e     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, et al. Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2003;238:67-72.
2. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1309-1314; discussion 1314-1315.
3. Pokala N, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:531-535.
4. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, et al. Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:485-490.
5. Shore G, Gonzalez QH, Bondora A, et al. Laparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn disease. Arch Surg. 2003;138:76-79.
6. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg. 2004;139:39-42.
7. Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:409-417.
8. Kaiser AM, Kang JC, Chan LS, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14:329-334.
9. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2006;243:143-149; editorial 150-153.
10. Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, et al. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1031-1033.
11. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1111-1124.
12. Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, et al. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1179-1186.
13. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187-1192.
14. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287:321-328.
15. Office for Civil Rights. OCR Privacy Brief: Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Vol. 2007. Washington, DC: Office for Civil Rights; 2007.
16. Premier. Perspective RX database. Available at: http://www.premierinc. com/quality-safety/tools-services/prs/services/perspectiverx.jsp. Accessed February 1, 2008.
17. DHHS. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification: ICD-9-CM. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.
18. All patient refined diagnosis related groups (APR-DRG) [computer program]. Version 12.0. Wallingford, CT: 3M Health Information Systems; 1995.
19. SAS/STAT User's Guide [computer program]. Version 9. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2003.
20. Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, et al. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:531-537.
21. Senagore AJ, Brannigan A, Kiran RP, et al. Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1016-1020.
22. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, et al. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:177-181.
23. Poisal JA, Truffer C, Smith S, et al. Health spending projections through 2016: modest changes obscure part D's impact. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:w242-w253.