Personality Psychology: Lexical Approaches, Assessment Methods, and Trait Concepts Reveal Only Half of the Story-Why it is Time for a Paradigm Shift

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-55

  Uher, Jana ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Big five model; Five factor model; Lexical approach; Lexical hypothesis; Meta theory; Methodology; Personality; Personality assessment; Philosophy of science; Traits

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873368625     PISSN: 19324502     EISSN: 19363567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6     Document Type: Article

References (232)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1994). Intelligence, attention, and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Volume 4. Theories of intelligence (pp. 1-27). Norwood: Ablex.
2. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan.
3. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4. Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. G. (1936). Trait names: a psycholexial study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1.
5. Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1970). Reading capital. London: New Left Books.
6. Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., & John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: a psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89-118.
7. Aristotle (1963[1936]). Physiognomics. In Aristotle. Minor works (pp. 81-137). trans. W. S. Hett. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
8. Arro, G. (2012). Peeking into personality test answers: Inter- and intraindividual variety in item interpretations. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi: 10. 1007/s12124-012-9216-9.
9. Asendorpf, J. B. (1988). Individual response profiles in the behavioral assessment of personality. European Journal of Personality, 2, 155-167.
10. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5-24.
11. Augustine, Saint (397-398 AD/1961). Confessions. Translated by Pinecoffin, R. S. (Ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
12. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
13. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press.
14. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403.
15. Belyaev, D. K. (1969). Domestication of animals. Science Journal (U. K.), 5, 47-52.
16. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology. Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bhutta, M. (2007). Sex and the nose: human pheromonal responses. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 268-274.
18. Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively. Psychological Science, 24, 589-594.
19. Blaffer-Hrdy, S. (2009). Mothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge: Belknap.
20. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-229.
21. Block, J. (2001). Millenial contrarianism: the five factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 98-107.
22. Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2-25.
23. Bock, P. K. (2000). Culture and personality revisited. American Behavioural Scientist, 44, 32-40.
24. Bolden, R., & Moscarola, J. (2000). Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide: the lexical approach to textual data analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 450-460.
25. Bordt, M. (1998). Platon Werke. Übersetzung und Kommentar, Band V 4. Lysis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
26. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
27. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (2008). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa & McCrae. 2. neu normierte und vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
28. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614.
29. Bouts, P. (1931/1986). La psychognomie. Paris: Dervy-Livres.
30. Brody, N. (1994). Heritability of traits. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 117-119.
31. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Brower, D. (1949). The problem of quantification of psychological science. Psychological Review, 56, 325-331.
33. Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217.
36. Carrasco, M. C., Bernal, M. C., & Redolat, R. (2001). Time estimation and aging: a comparison between young and elderly adults. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 52, 91-101.
37. nd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38. Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Personality development across the life course: the argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 49-66.
39. Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality I. Foundations of trait measurement. Psychological Review, 50, 559-594.
40. Cattell, R. B. (1950). An introduction to personality study. London: Hutchinson.
41. Cattell, R. B. (1952). Factor analysis. New York: Wiley.
42. Cervone, D., Shadel, W. G., & Jencius, S. (2001). Social-cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 33-51.
43. Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (1988). The emic strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in a non-Western culture: Rationale, steps, and a Philippine illustration. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 140-163.
44. Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (1989). Internal, external, and self-report structure of personality: An investigation of cross-language and cross-cultural generalizability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 857-872.
45. Conley, J. J. (1984). Longitudinal consistency of adult personality: self-reported psychological characteristics across 45 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1325-1333.
46. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
47. Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
48. Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
49. De Raad, B. (1998). Five big, Big Five issues: Rationale, content, structure, status, and crosscultural assessment. European Psychologist, 3, 113-124.
50. De Weerth, C., van Geert, P., & Hoitink, H. (1999). Intra-individual variability in infant behavior. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1102-1112.
51. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
52. Diriwächter, R., Valsiner, J. & Sauck, C. (2004). Microgenesis in Making Sense of Oneself: Constructive Recycling of Personality Inventory Items. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6, Art. 11.
53. Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
54. Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
55. Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
56. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (Eds.). (2001). Progress in ambulatory assessment. Computerassisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
57. Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment-monitoring behavior in daily life settings. A behavioral-scientific challenge for psychology. European Journal of Personality Assessment, 23, 206-213.
58. Fenson, L., Bates, E., Dale, P., Goodman, J., Reznick, J. S., & Thal, D. (2000). Measuring variability in early child language: Don't shoot the messenger. Comment on Feldman et al. Child Development, 71, 323-328.
59. Fraisse, P. (1964). The psychology of time. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
60. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition, 14, 159-214.
61. Funder, D. C. (2004). The personality puzzle (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
62. Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 36, 179-185.
63. Germonpré, M., Sablin, M. V., Stevens, R. E., Hedges, R. E. M., Hofreiter, M., Stiller, M., et al. (2009). Fossil dogs and wolves from Palaeolithic sites in Belgium, the Ukraine and Russia: Osteometry, ancient DNA and stable isotopes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 473-490.
64. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: a heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254-267.
65. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & the ABC Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Gillath, O., Bahns, A. J., Ge, F., & Crandall, C. S. (online 2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality.
67. Gillespie, A., & Zittaun, T. (2010). Studying the moment of thought. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 69-88). Charlotte: Information age publishing.
68. Gillies, D. (2000). Varieties of propensity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 807-835.
69. Goethe, J. W. (1907). In M. Hecker (Ed.), Maximen und reflexionen. Schriften der goethe-gesellschaft, 21. Weimar: Verlag der Goethe-Gesellschaft.
70. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills: Sage.
71. Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1) (pp. 203-234). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
72. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
73. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
74. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
75. Grandin, T., & Johnson, C. (2005). Animals in translation. New York: Scribner.
76. Grammer, K., Fink, B., & Neave, N. (2005). Human pheromones and sexual attraction. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 111, 135-142.
77. Gray, P. (1999). Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Worth.
78. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79. Hartung, F.-M., & Renner, B. (2011). Social curiosity and interpersonal perception: a judge x trait interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 796-814.
80. Hausheer, H. (1937). St. Augustine's conception of time. Philosophical Review, 46, 503-512.
81. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's Wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective likert scales?: the reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918.
82. Heisenberg, W. (1989). Encounters with Einstein: And other essays on people, places, and particles. Princeton University Press.
83. Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of science, 15, 135-75; reproduced in Hempel, Carl G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.
84. Howard, G. S. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 399-404.
85. Howarth, C., Foster, J., & Dorrer, N. (2004). Exploring the potential of the theory of social representations in community-based health research-and vice versa? Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 229-245.
86. Inoue S., & Matsuzawa, T. (2007). Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, R1004-R1005.
87. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions-Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
88. James, W. (1893). The principles of psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company.
89. Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 83-101.
90. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
91. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
92. John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: a historical. Review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171-203.
93. Joubert, C. E. (1984). Structured time and subjective acceleration of time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 335-336.
94. Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.
95. Kagan, J. (1994). Galen's prophecy. New York: Basic Books.
96. Kagan, J. (1998). Three seductive ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
97. Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., & Snidman, N. (1988). Biological bases of childhood shyness. Science, 240, 167-171.
98. Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for 'fast mapping'. Science, 304, 1682-1683.
99. Keller, H. (2007). Cultures of infancy. New York: Tailor and Francis.
100. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1 And 2). New York: Norton.
101. Komatsu, K. (2012). Temporal reticence of the self: who can know my self? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 357-372.
102. Køppe, S. (2012). A moderate eclecticism: ontological and epistemological issues. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 1-19.
103. Kramer, R. S. S., & Ward, R. (2010). Internal facial features are signals of personality and health. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2273-2287.
104. Kretschmer, E. (1977). Körperbau und Charakter (1st ed. 1921) (26th ed.). Berlin: Springer.
105. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
106. Kuhn, T. S. (1976). The function of dogma in scientific research. In I. R. Averill (Ed.), Patterns of psychological thought (pp. 47-66). Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Co.
107. Lahlou, S. (1996). Propagation of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26, 157-175.
108. Lahlou, S. (2001). Functional aspects of social representations. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 131-146). Oxford: Blackwell.
109. Lahlou, S. (2008). L'Installation du Monde: De la représentation à l'activité en situation. Aix-en-Provence, Université de Provence: Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches en Psychologie, 375.
110. Lahlou, S. (2011a). How can we capture the subject's perspective?: an evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50, 607-655.
111. Lahlou, S. (2011b). Socio-cognitive issues in human-centred design for the real world. In G. Boy (Ed.), The handbook of human-machine interaction (pp. 165-188). Aldershot: Ashgate.
112. Lamiell, J. T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences: Human individuality, scientific psychology, and William Stern's critical personalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
113. Laucken, U. (1974). Naive verhaltenstheorie. Stuttgart: Klett.
114. Laureys, S., Pellas, F., van Eeckhout, P., Ghorbel, S., Schnakers, C., Perrin, F., et al. (2005) The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Progress in Brain Research, 150, 495-511.
115. Lavater, J. C. (1775-1778). Physiognomische fragmente physiognomische fragmente, zur beförderung der menschenkenntniß und menschenliebe. (Bde. I-IV.). Leipzig und Winterthur: Weidmann und Steiner.
116. Lazarus, A. A. (1981). The practice of multimodal therapy: Systematic, comprehensive, effective psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
117. Le Poidevin, R. (2004). A puzzle concerning time perception. Synthese, 142, 109-142.
118. Le Poidevin, R. (2011). The experience and perception of time. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/fall2011/entries/time-experience/.
119. Lehner, P. N. (1998). Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
121. Li, W., Moallem, I., Paller, K. A., & Gottfried, J. A. (2007). Subliminal smells can guide social preferences. Psychological Science, 18, 1044-1049.
122. Locke, J. (1689/1975). Essay concerning human understanding. Book II. (chapter 32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
123. Loehlin, J. C., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & John, O. P. (1998). Heritabilities of common and measure-specific components of the big five personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 431-453.
124. Loftus, G. R. (1996). Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 161-171.
125. Ludlow, P., Nagasawa, Y., & Stoljar, D. (Eds.) (2004). There's something about Mary. Essays on phenomenal consciousness and Frank Jackson's knowledge argument. MIT Press/A Bradford Book.
126. Marx, K. (1867). Das kapital. Buch I. Hamburg: Verlag Otto Meissner.
127. Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
128. McAdams, D. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford.
129. McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
130. McAdams, D. P. (1994). A psychology of the stranger. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 145-148.
131. McCrae, R. (2009). The physics and chemistry of personality. Theory and Psychology, 19, 670-687.
132. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
133. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159-180). New York: Guilford.
134. Meehl, P. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences of kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117-174.
135. Mehl, M. R., & Connor, T. S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press.
136. Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355-383.
137. Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: positivism, naïve realism and the place in quantitative methods in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13, 5-31.
139. Millikan, R. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Bradford: MIT Press.
140. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
141. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1994). Personality psychology has two goals: must it be two fields? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 156-158.
142. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
143. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2002). Situation-behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 50-54.
144. Molenaar, P. C. (2004a). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201-218.
145. Molenaar, P. C. (2004b). Forum discussion of the manifesto's aggregational act. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 248-254.
146. Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF.
147. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
148. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
149. Neuman, Y., Turney, P. D., & Cohen, Y. (2012). How language enables abstraction: a study in computational cultural psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 129-145.
150. Norman, T. (1967). 2, 800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
151. Omi, Y. (2012). Tension between the theoretical thinking and the empirical method: is it an inevitable fate for psychology? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 118-127.
152. Patterson, F., & Linden, E. (1981). The education of Koko. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
153. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
154. Pawlik, K. (2006). Objektive tests in der persönlichkeitsforschung. In T. M. Ortner, R. T. Proyer, & K. D. Kubinger (Eds.), Theorie und praxis objektiver persönlichkeitstests (pp. S. 16-S. 23). Bern: Hans Huber.
155. Peirce, C. S. (1901/1935). Collected papers of Charles sanders Peirce (CP 7. 218-1901, On the logic of drawing history from ancient documents especially from testimonies). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
156. Peirce, C. S. (1902/1958). The simplest mathematics (CP 4. 227-323). In Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. 1-6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (eds.), vols. 7-8, A. W. Burks (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1931-1935.
157. Peirce, C. S. (1903/1997). Lecture five: the normative sciences. In C. S. Peirce (Ed.), Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking (pp. 205-220). Edited by P. Turrisi. Albany, NY: Suny Press [Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism-CP 5. 188-89].
158. Pepperberg, I. M. (2002). In search of King Solomon's ring: cognitive and communicative studies of grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 59, 54-67.
159. Pervin, L. A., & John, O. P. (1997). Personality: Theory and research (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.
160. Piaget, J. (1969). The child's perception of time. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
161. Pillai, P. (2012). Cultural directions and origins of everyday decisions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 235-242.
162. Popper, K. R. (1959). The propensity interpretation of probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 37, 25-42.
163. Popper, K. R. (1934). Logik der forschung. Wien: Springer.
164. Rosenbaum, P. J., & Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: from rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory and Psychology, 21(1), 47-65.
165. Rosenthal, V. (2004). Microgenesis, immediate experience and visual processes in reading. In A. Carsetti (Ed.), Seeing, thinking and knowing-Meaning and self-organisation in visual cognition and thought, (pp. 221-243). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
166. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
167. Rychlak, J. F. (1968). A philosophy of science for personality theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
168. Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: a dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81, 6-22.
169. Sato, T., Wakabayashi, K., Nameda, A., Yasuda, Y., & Watanabe, Y. (2010). Understanding a personality as a whole. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 89-119). Charlotte: InfoAge Publications.
170. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the big five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495-524.
171. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., & Fields, W. M. (2000). Linguistic, cultural and cognitive capabilities of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Culture & Psychology, 6, 131-153.
172. Schoggen, P. (1989). Behavior settings. A revision and extension of Roger G. Barker's ecological psychology. Stanford University Press.
173. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: how the questions shape the answer. American Psychologist, 54, 93-105.
174. Schwarz, M. (2009). Is psychology based on a methodological error? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43, 185-213.
175. Sheldon, W. H. & Stevens, S. S. (1942). The varieties of temperament: a psychology of constitutional differences. (1st ed). Harper & Brother.
176. Shevlin, M., Walker, S., Davies, M. N. O., Banyard, P., & Lewis, C. A. (2003). Can you judge a book by its cover? Evidence of self-stranger agreement on personality at zero acquaintance. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1373-1383.
177. Shweder, R. A., & D'Andrade, R. G. (1980). The systematic distortion hypothesis. In R. A. Shweder (Ed.), Fallible judgement in behavioral research: New directions for the methodology in social and behavioral science, Vol. 4 (pp. 37-58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
178. Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 399-416). New York: Guilford Press.
179. Sih, A., & Bell, A. M. (2008). Insights from behavioral syndromes for behavioral ecology. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 277-281.
180. Simon, H. A. (1993). Homo rationalis: die Vernunft im menschlichen Leben. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. [engl. Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford, California: University Press.].
181. Sinn, D. L., & Moltschaniwskyj, N. A. (2005). Personality traits in dumpling squid (Euprymna tasmanica): context-specific traits and their correlation with biological characteristics. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 99-110.
182. Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The big five personality traits and the life course: a 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208-232.
183. Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271-295.
184. Sprung, L., & Sprung, H. (1984). Grundlagen der methodologie und methodik der psychologie. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
185. Standford, C. B. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: empirical evidnce and shifting assumptions. Current Anthropology, 39, 399-420.
186. Stern, W. (1935). Allgemeine Psychologie auf personalistischer Grundlage. Haag: Nijhoff. English translation (1938). General Psychology From the Personalistic Standpoint. New York: Macmillan.
187. Suomi, S. J. (2005). How gene-environment interactions shape the development ofimpulsive aggression in rhesus monkeys. In D. M. Stoff & E. J. Sussman (Eds.), Developmental psychobiology of aggression (pp. 252-268). New York: Cambridge University Press.
188. Tellegen, A. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorders. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122-130.
189. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1993). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
190. Thurstone, L. L. (1934). The vectors of mind. Psychological Review, 41, 1-32.
191. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410-433.
192. Tolman, E. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.
193. Toomela, A. (2008). Variables in psychology: a critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 245-265.
194. Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox-and how it escapes from that box. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 45-66). New York: Springer.
195. Toomela, A. (2010a). In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 1-26). Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.
196. Toomela, A. (2010b). In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, A. Gennaro, & J. B. Simon Travers (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 2). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Group.
197. Toomela, A. (2011). Travel into a fairy land: a critique of modern qualitative and mixed methods psychologies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 21-47.
198. Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.
199. Trendler, G. (2009). Measurement theory, psychology and the revolution that cannot happen. Theory and Psychology, 19, 579-599.
200. Trut, L. N. (1999). Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. American Scientist, 87, 160-169.
201. Uher, J. (2008a). Three methodological core issues of comparative personality research. European Journal of Personality, 22, 475-496.
202. Uher, J. (2008b). Comparative personality research: methodological approaches. European Journal of Personality, 22, 427-455.
203. Uher, J. (2009). Botanical personality? On the origins of consistent individual differences in behavior. In J. Uher Comparative research on personality in Animalia and Plantae. PhD-Dissertation. Berlin: Freie Universität.
204. Uher, J. (2011a). Individual behavioral phenotypes: an integrative meta-theoretical framework. Why 'behavioral syndromes' are not analogues of 'personality'. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 521-548.
205. Uher, J. (2011b). Personality in nonhuman primates: What can we learn from human personality psychology? In A. Weiss, J. E. King, & L. Murray (Eds.), Personality and behavioral syndromes in nonhuman primates. New York: Springer.
206. Uher, J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Personality assessment in the great apes: comparing ecologically valid behavior measures, behavior ratings, and adjective ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 821-838.
207. Uher, J., Asendorpf, J. B., & Call, J. (2008). Personality in the behaviour of great apes: temporal stability, cross-situational consistency and coherence in response. Animal Behaviour, 75, 99-112.
208. Utz, K. (2005). Philosophie des Zufalls: Ein Entwurf. Paderborn: Schöningh.
209. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
210. Valsiner, J. (2009). Cultural psychology today: innovations and oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15, 5-39.
211. Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science: History of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
212. van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: new tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340-374.
213. Veltkamp, G. M., Recio, G., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2012). Is personality modulated by language? Evidence from bilinguals' NEO-FFI scores. International Journal of Bilingualism. Published online before print April 16, 2012, doi: 10. 1177/1367006912438894.
214. Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: a British debate. Culture & Psychology, 11, 431-454.
215. Von Mises, R. (1928/1981). Probability, statistics and truth. New York: Dover Publications.
216. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
217. Wagner, W., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., Duveen, G., et al. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. London: LSE Research Online.
218. Wagoner, B. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, N. Chaudhary, & M. Lyra (Eds.), Handbook of dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 99-121). New York: Springer.
219. Weber, M. (1949). In E. Shils & H. Finch (Eds.), The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
220. Webster's new international dictionary (1925). (2nd unabridged ed.) Springfield: Merriam.
221. Weinstein, T. A. R., & Capitanio, J. P. (2008). Individual differences in infant temperament predict social relationships of yearling rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Behaviour, 76, 455-465.
222. Weinstein, T. A. R., & Capitanio, J. P. (2012). Longitudinal stability of friendships in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): individual- and relationship-level effects. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 97-108.
223. Westen, D. (1996). A model and a method for uncovering the nomothetic from the idiographic: an alternative to the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 400-413.
224. Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 1061-1106.
225. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. New York: Harper.
226. Whorf, B. L. (1958). Language and stereotypes. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1-9). New York: Holt.
227. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: the inter-personal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
228. Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford.
229. Witkowski, S. R., & Brown, C. H. (1978). Lexical universals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7(427), 451.
230. Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 454-469.
231. Wright, J. C., & Zakriski, A. L. (2003). When syndromal similarity obscures functional dissimilarity: distinctive evoked environments of externalizing and mixed syndrome children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 516-527.
232. Wundt, W. M. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology. London: Allen.