Peeking into Personality Test Answers: Inter- and Intraindividual Variety in Item Interpretations

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 56-76

  Arro, Grete ^a  

^a TALLINN UNIVERSITY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Item interpretation; Item trans contextuality; Meaning construction; Personality testing; Situational approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874544940     PISSN: 19324502     EISSN: 19363567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-012-9216-9     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arro, G. (2010). Children's self-reflection and personality and their relationships with cognitive ability and academic success. In A. Toomela (Ed.), Systemic person-oriented study of child development in early primary school (pp. 225-245). Switzerland: Peter Lang Verlag.
2. Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645-664.
3. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the Five-Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 187-215.
4. Blount, C., Evans, C., Birch, S., Warren, F., & Norton, K. (2002). The properties of self-report research measures: beyond psychometrics. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75, 151-164.
5. Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & McGue, M. (1990). Genetic and rearing environmental influences on adult personality: an analysis of adopted twins reared apart. Journal of Personality, 58, 263-292.
6. Bowler, M. C., Bowler, J. L., & Phillips, B. C. (2009). The Big-5 ± 2? The impact of cognitive complexity on the factor structure of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 979-984.
7. Butler, R. (2009). Reflections in personal construct theory. New Jersey: Wiley.
8. Claxton, A., O'Rourke, N., Smith, J. Z., & DeLongis, A. (2012). Personality traits and marital satisfaction within enduring relationships: an intra-couple discrepancy approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 375-396.
9. Clegg, J. (2010). Uncertainty as a fundamental scientific value. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 245-251.
10. Craig, G., & Boyle, M. E. (1979). The recognition and spontaneous use of psychological descriptions by young children. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 207-208.
11. De Fruyt, F., & Vollarth, M. (2003). Inter-parent agreement on higher and lower level traits in two countries: effects of parent and child gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(2), 289-301.
12. De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., Hoekstra, H. A., & Rolland, J.-P. (2000). Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7(4), 329-345.
13. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
14. Diriwächter, R., Valsiner, J., & Sauck, C. (2005). Microgenesis in making sense of oneself: constructive recycling of personality inventory items. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1).
15. Donahue, E. M. (1994). Do children use the Big Five, too? Content and structural form in personality description. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 45-66.
16. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011-1027.
17. Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate. The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 83-87.
18. Freeman, M. (2011). Toward poetic science. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 45(4), 389-396.
19. Freund, A., & Smith, J. (1999). Methodological comment: temporal stability of older person's spontaneous self-definition. Experimental Aging Research, 25(1), 95-107.
20. Fujita, K., & Han, H. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses: the effect of construal levels on evaluative associations in self-control conflicts. Psychological Science, 20, 799-804.
21. Goldberg, L. R., & Kilkowski, J. M. (1985). The prediction of semantic consistency in self-descriptions: characteristics of persons and of terms that affect the consistency of responses to synonym and antonym pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 82-98.
22. Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2011). Insight, rumination, and self-reflection as predictors of well-being. Journal of Psychology, 145(1), 39-57.
23. Hendriks, A. A. J., Kuyper, H., Offringa, G. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2008). Assessing young adolescents' personality with the five-factor personality inventory. Assessment, 15, 304.
24. Hodge, D. R., & Gillespie, D. (2003). Phrase completions: an alternative to Likert scales. Social Work Research, 27, 45-56.
25. Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and Job-performance relations: a socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100-112.
26. International personality item pool: a scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences (http://ipip. ori. org/). Internet Web Site.
27. John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of personality: theory and research (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.
28. Jovanović, G. (2010). Historizing epistemology in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(4), 310-328.
29. Kangro, E.-M. (2010). Role of reflection-ability in children's self-regulation. In Toomela, Aaro (Ed.), Systemic person-oriented study of child development in early primary school (pp. 225-245). Switzerland: Peter Lang Verlag.
30. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
31. Lounsbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E., Loveland, J. L., & Gibson, L. W. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality traits in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 65-75.
32. Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., Tinsley, B. J., & Ericsen, A. J. (2002). A preliminary validation of preadolescents' self-reports using the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 173-181.
33. Mayer, J. D., & Korogodsky, M. (2011). A really big picture of personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(2), 104-117.
34. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2006). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
35. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1456-1468.
36. Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 90-106.
37. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268.
38. Mõttus, R., McNeill, G., Jia, X., Craig, L. C. A., Starr, J. M., Deary, I. J. (2011). The Associations between personality, diet and body mass index in older people. Health Psychology.
39. Omi, Y. (2012). Tension between the theoretical thinking and the empirical method: is it an inevitable fate for psychology? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 46(1), 118-127.
40. Quartier, V., & Rossier, J. (2008). A study of personality in children aged 8-12 years: comparing self- and parents' ratings. European Journal of Personality, 22(7), 575-588.
41. Rammstedt, B., Goldberg, L. R., & Borg, I. (2010). The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 53-61.
42. Roberts, B. W. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and Assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 137-145.
43. Rosenbaum, P. J., & Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 47-65.
44. Sauter, F. M., Heyne, D., Blöte, A. W., van Widenfelt, B. M., & Westenberg, P. M. (2010). Assessing therapy-relevant cognitive capacities in young people: development and psychometric evaluation of the self-reflection and insight scale for youth. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 303-317.
45. Schwarz, M. (2009). Is psychology based on a methodological error? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43, 185-213.
46. Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330-348.
47. Stam, H. J. (2010). The fault is not in ourselves, but in our methods: comment on Schwarz. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 281-287.
48. Ten Berge, M., & De Raad, B. (2001). The construction of a joint taxonomy of traits and situations. European Journal of Personality, 15, 253-276.
49. Toomela, A. (2003). Relationships between personality structure, structure of word meaning, and cognitive ability: a study of cultural mechanisms of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 723-735.
50. Toomela, A. (2007). Culture of science: strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 6-20.
51. Toomela, A. (2008a). Noncognitive correlates of education. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 19-28.
52. Toomela, A. (2008b). Variables in psychology: a critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 245-265.
53. Toomela, A. (2009). Modern mainstream psychology is the best? In Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Information Age Publishing, 1-26.
54. Toomela, A. (2011). Travel into a fairy land: a critique of modern qualitative and mixed methods psychologies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 21-47.
55. Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the Five-Factor Model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284-304.
56. Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: a requiem to the post-modernist experiment with Wissenschaft. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1-21.
57. Vygotskij, L. S. (2002). Denken und Sprechen. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag. (Original im 1934).
58. Wagoner, B., & Valsiner, J. (2005). Rating tasks in psychology: from static ontology to dialogical synthesis of meaning. In A. Gülerçe, I. Steauble, A. Hofmeister, G. Saunders, & J. Kaye (Eds.), Contemporary theorizing in psychology: global perspectives (pp. 197-213). Toronto: Captus Press.