ICT driven pedagogies and its impact on learning outcomes in high school mathematics

International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 73-83

  Chandra, Vinesh ^a   Briskey, Jo ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

High school; ICT; Learning outcomes; Mathematics; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873270322     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18334105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.1.73     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bell, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Journal Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1), 5-34.
2. California Department of Education. (2012). STAR. Retrieved from http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2004/help_comparescores.asp
3. Chandra, V., & Lloyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1087-1098.
4. Chandra, V., & Watters, J. (2011). Re-thinking physics teaching with web-based learning. Computers and Education, 58(1), 631-640.
5. Clements, D. H. (1991). Enhancement of creativity in computer environments. American Education Research Journal, 28(1), 173-187.
6. Crook, C., Harrison, C., Farrington-Flint, L., Tomas, C., & Underwood, J. (2010). The impact of technology: Value-added classroom practice: Final report. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1771/
7. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
8. Diaper, G. (1990). The Hawthorne effect: A fresh examination. Educational Studies, 16, 261-267.
9. Fogarty, G. (2007). Research on the progressive achievement tests and academic achievement in secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/ACERPress_PAT_Supp.pdf
10. Fox, M. J. (2010). A funny thing happened on the way to the future: Twists and turns and lessons. Sydney, NSW: Hachette.
11. Funkhouser, C. P. (1993). The infl uence of problem-solving software on student attitudes about mathematics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(3), 339-346.
12. Gardner, C. M., Simmons, P. E., & Simpson, R. D. (1992). The effects of CAI and hands-on activities on elementary students' attitudes and weather knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 92(6), 334-336.
13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
14. Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
15. Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 75-96.
16. Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? Nottingham, England: British Educational Research Association.
17. Joy, E. H., & Garcia, F. (2000). Measuring learning effectiveness: A new look at no-signifi cant difference fi ndings. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 33-39.
18. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kim, H. K., & Rissel, D. (2008). Instructors' integration of computer technology: Examining the role of interaction. Foreign Language Annals, 41(1), 61-81.
20. Lindsey, J., Stephanou, A., Urbach, D., & Sadler, A. (2005). PATMaths progressive achievement tests in mathematics third edition teacher manual. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
21. Loong, E. Y.-K. (2010). Web-based mathematics: Student perspectives. MERGA 2010: Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 352-359). Fremantle, WA: MERGA.
22. Martin, R. (2009). Stories of my life: The autobiography. Sydney, NSW: Random House.
23. Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., & Chrostowski, S. (2004). TIMMS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings From Iea's Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study At The Fourth And Eighth Grades. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
24. Nguyen, D. M., & Kulm, G. (2005). Using web-based practice to enhance mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(3).
25. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the net generation. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
26. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.
27. Page, M. S. (2002). Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socio-economic status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 389-409.
28. Reglin, G. L. (1989). CAI effects on mathematics achievement and academic self-concept seminar. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 18(1), 43-48.
29. Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 839-911.
30. Skinner, M. E. (1990). The effects of computer-based instruction on the achievement of college students as a function of achievement status and mode of presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 6(4), 351-360.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher sociological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Wang, T.-H. (2011). Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56, 1062-1071.
33. Wolfram, C. (2010). Conrad Wolfram: Teaching kids real math with computers. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/conrad_wolfram_teaching_kids_real_math_with_computers.html