University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems

Journal of Economic Surveys

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 607-632

  Verspagen, Bart ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bayh Dole Act; Universities; University patents

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THEORY; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748099520     PISSN: 09500804     EISSN: 14676419     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aghion, P. and Tirole, J. (1994) The management of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 1185-1209.
2. Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002) Putting patents into context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48(1):44-60.
3. Arrow, K. J. (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Association of University Technology Managers (2002) AUTM Licensing survey 2002: AUTM.
5. Balconi, M., Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2004) Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian data. Research Policy 33(1):127-146.
6. Campbell, E. G., Weissman, J. S., Causino, N. and Blumenthal, D. (2000) Data withholding in academic medicine: Characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy 29:303-312.
7. Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., Walker, P., Thorns, D. C. and Nuth, M. Beyond the hype: Intellectual property and the knowledge economy/knowledge society. Journal of Economic Surveys 20:633-690.
8. Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L. and Walsh, J. (1998) Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. Noll (ed.), Challenges to Research Universities (pp. 171-191). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48(1):1-23.
10. Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N. and Sampat, B. N. (2002) How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science 48(1):61-72.
11. Crespi, G., Geuna, A. and Verspagen, B. (2006) University IPRs and knowledge transfer. Is the IPR ownership model more efficient? Mimeo SPRU, University of Sussex and Ecis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
12. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. (1994) Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23:487-521.
13. David, P. A. (1993) Intellectual property institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, copyrights, and trade secrets in economic theory and history. In M. B. Wallerstein, M. E. Mogee and R. A. Schoen (eds.), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology (pp. 19-61). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Eisenberg, R. (1996) Public research and private development: Patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review 83:1663-1727.
15. European Commission (2003) The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Brussels, COM(2003) 58 final.
16. Freeman, C. (1986) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
17. Geuna, A. and Nesta, L. J. J. (2006) University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 35:790-807.
18. Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., Geuna, A., Gonzales, R., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., Lebas, C., Luzzi, A., Magazzini, L., Nesta, L., Nomaler, Ö., Palomeras, N., Patel, P., Romanelli, M. and Verspagen, B. (2005) Everything you Always Wanted to Know about Inventors (but Never Asked): Evidence from the PatVal-EU Survey. LEM Papers Series, 2005/20, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
19. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics 80:119-127.
20. Kline, S. J. and Rosenberg, N. (1986) An overview of innovation. In R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (pp. 275-304). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
21. Liebowitz, S. J. and Watt, R. (2006) How to best ensure remuneration from creators in the market for music? Copyright and its alternatives. Journal of Economic Surveys 20:513-545.
22. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
23. Meyer, M. (2002) Do patents reflect the inventive output of university research? Leuven/Helsinki: KU Leuven/Finnish Institute for Enterprise Management.
24. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30:99-119.
25. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. N. (2001) University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925-1980. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(3):781-814.
26. Mowery, D. C., Sampat, D. N. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2002) Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science 48(1):73-89.
27. Mowery, D. C. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2002) Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy 31:399-418.
28. Nelson, R. R. (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67:297-306.
29. Nelson, R. R. (1993) National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. OECD (ed.) (2003) Turning Science into Business. Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations. Paris: OECD.
31. Pavitt, K. (1993) What do firms learn from basic research? In D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds), Technology and the Wealth of Nations (pp. 29-40). London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
32. Porter, M. (2001) Innovation and competitiveness: Findings on the Netherlands. Den Haag: Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Netherlands.
33. Ramello, G. B. (2006) What's in a sign? Trademark law and economic theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 20:547-565.
34. Sampat, B. N., Mowery, D. C. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2003) Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21:1371-1390.
35. Saragossi, S. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003) What patent data reveal about universities: The case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer 18:47-51.
36. Towse, R. (2006) Copyright and artists: A view from cultural economics. Journal of Economic Surveys 20: 567-585.
37. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. and Jaffe, A. (1997) University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5: 19-50.