Age, clutter, and competitive selection

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 616-626

  McCarley, Jason S ^a   Yamani, Yusuke ^b   Kramer, Arthur F ^b   Mounts, Jeffrey R W ^c  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Biased competition; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL CLUTTER; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL STIMULATION; AGE; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873053487     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: 19391498     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026705     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Allen, M. J., & Vos, J. J. (1967). Ocular scattered light and visual performance as a function of age. American Journal of Optometry & Archives of the American Academty of Optometry, 44, 717-727.
2. Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Groth, K. E., & Crozier, L. C. (1992). Impact of age, redundancy, and perceptual noise on visual search. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 69-74.
3. Allen, P. A., Weber, T. A., & May, N. (1993). Age differences in letter and color matching: Selective attention or internal noise? Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 69-77.
4. Atchley, P., & Hoffman, L. (2004). Aging and visual masking: Sensory and attentional factors. Psychology and Aging, 19, 57-67. doi:10.1037/ 0882-7974.19.1.57
5. Bahcall, D. O., & Kowler, E. (1999). Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research, 39, 71-86. doi:10.1016/S0042- 6989(98)00090-X
6. Ball, K., Owsley, C., & Beard, B. (1990). Clinical visual perimetry underestimates peripheral field problems in older adults. Clinical Vision Science, 5, 113-125.
7. Basak, C., & Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: Capacity differences and speed equivalence. Psychology and Aging, 18, 240-249. doi:10.1037/ 0882-7974.18.2.240
8. Boehler, C. N., Tsotsos, J. K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H.-J., & Hopf, J.-M. (2009). The center-surround profile of the focus of attention arises from recurrent processing in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 982- 991. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn139
9. Boehler, C. N., Tsotsos, J. K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H.-J., & Hopf, J.-M. (2011). Neural mechanisms of surround attentuation and distractor competition in visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 5213-5224. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6406-10.2011
10. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178. doi:10.1038/226177a0
11. Buffalo, E. A., Bertini, G., Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (2005). Impaired filtering of distracter stimuli by TE neurons following V4 and TEO lesions in macaques. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 141-151. doi:10.1093/ cercor/bhh117
12. Buffalo, E. A., Fries, P., Landman, R., Liang, H., & Desimone, R. (2010). A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 361-365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907658106
13. Caparos, S., & Linnell, K. J. (2010). The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1080-1107. doi: 10.1037/a0020367
14. Caputo, G., & Guerra, S. (1998). Attentional selection by distractor suppression. Vision Research, 5, 669 - 689. doi:10.1016/S0042- 6989(97)00189-2
15. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45.
16. Cremer, R., & Zeef, E. J. (1987). What kind of noise increases with age? Journal of Gerontology, 42, 515-518.
17. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. doi:10.1146/ annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
18. Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1979). Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Research, 178, 363-380. doi:10.1016/0006- 8993(79)90699-1
19. De Weerd, P., Peralta, M. R., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999). Loss of attentional stimulus selection after extrastriate lesions in macaques. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 753-758. doi:10.1038/11234
20. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
21. Egeth, H., & Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 551-560. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.551
22. Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225-234. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9
23. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240. doi:10.3758/BF03211502
24. Freeman, J., & Pelli, D. G. (2007). An escape from crowding. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-14. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/7/2/22. doi: 10.1167/7.2.22
25. Ghose, G. M., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2008). Spatial summation can explain the attentional modulation of neuronal responses to multiple stimuli in area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5115-5126. doi:10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.0138-08.2008
26. Gottlob, L. R., & Madden, D. J. (1999). Age differences in the strategic allocation of visual attention. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, 165-172. doi:10.1093/geronb/54B.3.P165
27. Grady, C. L., Maisong, J. M., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mentis, M. J., Salerno, J. A.,. . Haxby, J. V. (1994). Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1450-1462.
28. Grahame, M., Laberge, J., & Scialfa, C. T. (2004). Age differences in search of web pages: The effects of link size, link number, and clutter. Human Factors, 46, 385-398. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.385.50404
29. Greenwood, P. M., & Parasuraman, R. (1999). Scale of attentional focus in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 837-859. doi:10.3758/ BF03206901
30. Habak, C., Wilkinson, F., & Wilson, H. R. (2008). Aging disrupts the neural transformations that link facial identity across views. Vision Research, 48, 9-15. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.007
31. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. K. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Hennelly, M. L., Barbur, J. L., Edgar, D. F., & Woodward, E. G. (1998). The effect of age on the light scattering characteristics of the eye. Ophthalmic and Phsyiological Optics, 18, 197-203. doi:10.1016/S0275- 5408(97)00077-X
33. Hilimire, M. R., Mounts, J. R. W., Parks, N. A., & Corballis, P. M. (2009). Competitive interaction degrades target selection: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 46, 1080-1089. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00846.x
34. Hilimire, M. R., Mounts, J. R. W., Parks, N. A., & Corballis, P. M. (2010). Event-related potentials dissociate effects of salience and space in biased competition for visual representation. PLoS ONE, 5, e12677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012677
35. Hopf, J. M., Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., Hagner, T., Mangun, G. R., Scheich, H., & Heinze, H. (2000). Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1233-1241. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.12.1233
36. Humphrey, D. G., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets. Psychology and Aging, 12, 704-717. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.704
37. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science, 282, 108 -111. doi:10.1126/ science.282.5386.108
38. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Pinsk, M. A., Elizondo, M. I., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2001). Modulation of sensory suppression: Implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1398-1411.
39. Kline, D. W., Kline, T. J. B., Fozard, J. L., Kosnik, W., Schieber, F., & Sekuler, R. (1992). Vision, aging, and driving: The problems of older drivers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 27-34.
40. Kosnik, W. D., Sekuler, R., & Kline, D. W. (1990). Self-reported visual problems of older drivers. Human Factors, 32, 597-608.
41. Kosnik, W. D., Winslow, L., Kline, D. W., Rasinski, K., & Sekuler, R. (1988). Visual changes in daily life throughout adulthood. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, 63-70.
42. Kosslyn, S. M., Brown, H. D., & Dror, I. E. (1999). Aging and the scope of visual attention. Gerontology, 45, 102-109. doi:10.1159/000022071
43. Kramer, A. F., & Madden, D. J. (2008). Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Psycholoy Press.
44. Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T., & Ford, M. A. (1997). Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 64-87. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0660
45. Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Tonev, S. T. (2006). Distraction as a determinant of processing speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 619-625. doi:10.3758/BF03193972
46. Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view". In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 145-162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11587-008
47. Madden, D. J., Gottlob, L. R., & Allen, P. A. (1999). Adult age differences in visual search accuracy: Attentional guidance and target detectability. Psychology and Aging, 14, 683-694. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.4.683
48. Madden, D. J., & Gottlob, L. R. (1997). Adult age differences in strategic and dynamic components of focusing visual attention. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 185-210. doi:10.1080/13825589708256647
49. Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., & Allen, P. A. (1992). Adult age differences in attentional allocation during memory search. Psychology and Aging, 7, 594-601. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.594
50. Madden, D. J., Turkington, T. G., Provenzale, J. M., Denny, L. L., Langley, L. K., Hawk, T. C., & Coleman, R. E. (2002). Aging and attentional guidance during visual search: Functional neuroanatomy by positron emission tomography. Psychology and Aging, 17, 24-43. doi:10.1037/ 0882-7974.17.1.24
51. Madden, D. J., Turkington, T. G., Provenzale, J. M., Hawk, T. C., Hoffman, J. M., & Coleman, R. E. (1997). Selective and divided visual attention: Age-related changes in regional cerebral blood flow measured by H2 15O PET. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 389-409. doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:6<389::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-#
52. Madden, D. J. (1990). Adult age differences in the time course of visual attention. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, 9-16. Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2002). Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast. Neuron, 35, 365-370.
53. Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2002). Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast. Neuron, 35, 365-370.
54. McCarley, J. S., Mounts, J. R. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2004). Age-related differences in localized attentional interference. Psychology and Aging, 19, 203-210. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.203
55. McCarley, J. S., Mounts, J. R. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). Spatiallymediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception. Acta Psychologica, 126, 98-119. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.004
56. McCarley, J. S., & Mounts, J. R. W. (2007). Localized attentional interference affects object individuation, not feature detection. Perception, 36, 17-32. doi:10.1068/p5598
57. McKendrick, A. M., Weymouth, A. E., & Battista, J. (2010). The effect of normal aging on closed contour shape discrimination. Journal of Vision, 10, 1-9, Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/10/2/1. doi:10.1167/ 10.2.1
58. McPhee, L. C., Scialfa, C. T., Dennis, W. M., Ho, G., & Caird, J. K. (2004). Age differences in visual search for traffic signs during a simulated conversation. Human Factors, 46, 674-685. doi:10.1518/ hfes.46.4.674.56817
59. Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782-784. doi:10.1126/ science.4023713
60. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61-64.
61. Mounts, J. R. W., & Gavett, B. E. (2004). The role of salience in localized attentional interference. Vision Research, 3, 1575-1588. doi:10.1016/ j.visres.2004.01.015
62. Mounts, J. R. W. (2005). Attentional selection: A salience-based competition for representation. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1190-1198. doi:10.3758/BF03193552
63. Müller, N. G., Mollenhauer, M., Rösler, A., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2005). The attention field has a Mexican hat distribution. Vision Research, 45, 1129-1137. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.003
64. Neider, M. B., Boot, W. R., & Kramer, A. F. (2010). Visual search for real world targets under conditions of high target-background similarity: Exploring training and transfer in younger and older adults. Acta Psychologica, 134, 29-39. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.001
65. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
66. Owsley, C., Ball, K., & Keeton, D. W. (1995). Relationship between visual sensitivity and target localization in older adults. Vision Research, 35, 579-587. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00166-J
67. Plude, D., & Doussard-Roosevelt, J. (1989). Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. Psychology and Aging, 4, 98-105. doi:10.1037/ 0882-7974.4.1.98
68. Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999). Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1736-1753.
69. Pomerantz, J. R., & Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635-649.
70. Pomerantz, J. R., Saeger, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 422-435.
71. Reynolds, J. H., & Desimone, R. (2003). Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4. Neuron, 37, 853- 863. doi:10.1016/S0896- 6273(03)00097-7
72. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.103.3.403
73. Scialfa, C. T., Kline, D. W., & Lyman, B. J. (1987). Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: Examination of the useful field of view. Psychology and Aging, 2, 14-19. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.14
74. Scialfa, C. T., & Kline, D. W. (1988). Effects of noise type and retinal eccentricity on age differences in identification and localization. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, 91-99.
75. Steelman-Allen, K. S., McCarley, J. S., & Mounts, J. R. W. (2009). Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 110-115. doi:10.3758/ PBR.16.1.110
76. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. doi:10.1016/0010- 0285(80)90005-5
77. Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Wai, W. Y. K., Lai, Y., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78, 507-545.
78. Tsotsos, J. K., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. J., Rothenstein, A. L., & Simine, E. (2008). The different stages of visual recognition need different attentional binding strategies. Brain Research, 1225, 119-132. doi:10.1016/ j.brainres.2008.05.038
79. van der Berg, R., Conelissen, F. W., & Roerdink, J. B. M. (2009). A crowding model of visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-11. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/9/4/24/. doi:10.1167/9.4.24
80. Verhaeghen, P. (2000). The parallels in beauty's blow: Time-accuracy functions and their implications for cognitive aging theories. In T. Perfect & E. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 50-86). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81. Voss, M. W., Erickson, K. I., Chaddock, L., Prakash, R. S., Colcombe, S. J., Morris, K. S.,. . Kramer, A. F. (2008). Dedifferentiation in the visual cortex: An fMRI investigation of individual differences in older adults. Brain Research, 1244, 121-131. doi:10.1016/ j.brainres.2008.09.051
82. Welford, A. T. (1981). Signal, noise, performance, and age. Human Factors, 23, 97-109.
83. Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 160-168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005
84. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-39. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00006
85. Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
86. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495-501. doi:10.1038/nrn1411
87. Womelsdorf, T., Anton-Erxleben, K., & Treue, S. (2008). Receptive field shift and shrinkage in macaque middle temporal area through attentional gain modulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8934-8944. doi:10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.4030-07.2008
88. Yamani, Y., McCarley, J. S., & Mounts, J. R. W. (2011). Visual processing remains parallel under high competition for selection. Manuscript in preparation.
89. Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. (2010). Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. Journal of Vision, 10, 1-12. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/content/10/10/16. doi:10.1167/10.10.16