Proteome coverage of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana: Implications for shotgun proteomic studies

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 79, Issue , 2013, Pages 195-199

  Mann, Gregory W ^a   Joshi, Hiren J ^b   Petzold, Christopher J ^a   Heazlewood, Joshua L ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis; Coverage; Database

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PEPTIDE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TRYPSIN;

EID: 84873044787     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Guerreiro N., Redmond J.W., Rolfe B.G., Djordjevic M.A. New Rhizobium leguminosarum flavonoid-induced proteins revealed by proteome analysis of differentially displayed proteins. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1997, 10:506-516.
2. Arabidopsis Genome initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
3. Weckwerth W., Baginsky S., van Wijk K., Heazlewood J.L., Millar A.H. The Multinational Arabidopsis Steering Subcommittee for Proteomics assembles the largest proteome database resource for plant systems biology. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4209-4210.
4. Joshi H.J., Hirsch-Hoffmann M., Baerenfaller K., Gruissem W., Baginsky S., Schmidt R., et al. MASCP Gator: an aggregation portal for the visualization of Arabidopsis proteomics data. Plant Physiol 2011, 155:259-270.
5. Swarbreck D., Wilks C., Lamesch P., Berardini T.Z., Garcia-Hernandez M., Foerster H., et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D1009-D1014.
6. Baerenfaller K., Hirsch-Hoffmann M., Svozil J., Hull R., Russenberger D., Bischof S., et al. pep2pro: a new tool for comprehensive proteome data analysis to reveal information about organ-specific proteomes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Integr Biol 2011, 3:225-237.
7. Sun Q., Zybailov B., Majeran W., Friso G., Olinares P.D., van Wijk K.J. PPDB, the plant proteomics database at Cornell. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D969-D974.
8. Ferro M., Brugière S., Salvi D., Seigneurin-Berny D., Court M., Moyet L., et al. AT_CHLORO, a comprehensive chloroplast proteome database with subplastidial localization and curated information on envelope proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1063-1084.
9. Castellana N.E., Payne S.H., Shen Z., Stanke M., Bafna V., Briggs S.P. Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:21034-21038.
10. Wienkoop S., Staudinger C., Hoehenwarter W., Weckwerth W., Egelhofer V. ProMEX-a mass spectral reference database for plant proteomics. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3. 10.3389/fpls.2012.00125.
11. Durek P., Schmidt R., Heazlewood J.L., Jones A., MacLean D., Nagel A., et al. PhosPhAt: the Arabidopsis thaliana phosphorylation site database. An update. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D828-D834.
12. Nakagami H., Sugiyama N., Mochida K., Daudi A., Yoshida Y., Toyoda T., et al. Large-scale comparative phosphoproteomics identifies conserved phosphorylation sites in plants. Plant Physiol 2010, 153:1161-1174.
13. 3DB: a plant protein phosphorylation database. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D960-D962.
14. Rode C., Senkler M., Klodmann J., Winkelmann T., Braun H.P. GelMap-a novel software tool for building and presenting proteome reference maps. J Proteomics 2011, 74:2214-2219.
15. Keil B. Specificity of proteolysis 1992, Springer, Berlin.
16. Cagney G., Amiri S., Premawaradena T., Lindo M., Emili A. In silico proteome analysis to facilitate proteomics experiments using mass spectrometry. Proteome Sci 2003, 1:5.
17. Forner F., Foster L.J., Toppo S. Mass spectrometry data analysis in the proteomics era. Curr Bioinform 2007, 2:63-93.
18. Carvalho P.C., Cociorva D., Wong C.C., Carvalho Mda G., Barbosa V.C., Yates J.R. Charge prediction machine: tool for inferring precursor charge states of electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2009, 81:1996-2003.
19. Yu L., Tan Y., Tsai Y., Goodlett D.R., Polfer N.C. On the relevance of peptide sequence permutations in shotgun proteomics studies. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:2409-2416.
20. Baerenfaller K., Grossmann J., Grobei M.A., Hull R., Hirsch-Hoffmann M., Yalovsky S., et al. Genome-scale proteomics reveals Arabidopsis thaliana gene models and proteome dynamics. Science 2008, 320:938-941.
21. Zybailov B., Friso G., Kim J., Rudella A., Rodriguez V.R., Asakura Y., et al. Large scale comparative proteomics of a chloroplast Clp protease mutant reveals folding stress, altered protein homeostasis, and feedback regulation of metabolism. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:1789-1810.
22. Clauser K.R., Baker P., Burlingame A.L. Role of accurate mass measurement (+/-10ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal Chem 1999, 71:2871-2882.
23. Perkins D.N., Pappin D.J., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.
24. Fenyö D., Qin J., Chait B.T. Protein identification using mass spectrometric information. Electrophoresis 1998, 19:998-1005.
25. Wolters D.A., Washburn M.P., Yates J.R. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2001, 73:5683-5690.
26. Horth P., Miller C.A., Preckel T., Wenz C. Efficient fractionation and improved protein identification by peptide OFFGEL electrophoresis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:1968-1974.
27. Chen H.S., Rejtar T., Andreev V., Moskovets E., Karger B.L. Enhanced characterization of complex proteomic samples using LC-MALDI MS/MS: exclusion of redundant peptides from MS/MS analysis in replicate runs. Anal Chem 2005, 77:7816-7825.
28. Parsons H.T., Christiansen K., Knierim B., Carroll A., Ito J., Batth T.S., et al. Isolation and proteomic characterization of the Arabidopsis Golgi defines functional and novel targets involved in plant cell wall biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 2012, 159:12-26.
29. Spahr C.S., Davis M.T., McGinley M.D., Robinson J.H., Bures E.J., Beierle J., et al. Towards defining the urinary proteome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. I. Profiling an unfractionated tryptic digest. Proteomics 2001, 1:93-107.
30. Heazlewood J.L. The green proteome: challenges in plant proteomics. Front Plant Sci 2011, 2. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00006.
31. Fonslow B.R., Carvalho P.C., Academia K., Freeby S., Xu T., Nakorchevsky A., et al. Improvements in proteomic metrics of low abundance proteins through proteome equalization using ProteoMiner prior to MudPIT. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:3690-3700.
32. Mann M., Kelleher N.L. Precision proteomics: the case for high resolution and high mass accuracy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:18132-18138.
33. de Hoffman E., Stroobant V. Mass spectrometry: principles and applications 2007, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England. Third edition.