Carbon footprints for food of animal origin: What are the most preferable criteria to measure animal yields?

Animals

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 108-126

  Flachowsky, Gerhard ^a   Kamphues, Josef ^b  

^a FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon footprints; Carcass; Edible protein; Eggs; Food of animal origin; Meat; Milk; System boundaries

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872865367     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20762615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ani2020108     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Steinfeld, D.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.; Castel, V.; Rosales, M.; de Haan C. Livestock's Long Shadow. Environmental Issues and Options; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006.
2. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge, UK, 2006; Volume 4.
3. The State of Food and Agriculture-Livestock in the Balance; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009.
4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector. A Life Cycle Assessment; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010.
5. De Vries, M.; de Boer, I.J.M. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livest. Sci. 2010, 128, 1-11.
6. O'Mara, F.P. The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in near future. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167, 7-15.
7. Lesschen, J.P.; van den Berg, M.; Westhoek, H.J.; Witzke, H.P.; Oenema, O. Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167, 16-28.
8. Sevenster, M.; de Jong, F. A Sustainable Dairy Sector-Global, Regional and Live Cycle Facts and Figures on Greenhouse-Gas Emissions; Technical Report; Publication No.: 08.7789; CE Delft: Delft, The Netherlands, 2008.
9. Herrero, M.; Gerber, P.; Vellinga, T.; Garnett, T.; Leip, A.; Opio, C.; Westhoek, H.J.; Thornton, P.K.; Olesen, J.; Hutchings, N.; et al. Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: The importance of getting the numbers right. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167, 779-782.
10. Leip, A.; Weiss, F.; Wasenaar, T.; Perez, I.; Fellmann, T.; Loudjami, P.; Tuiello, F.; Grandgirard, D.; Monni, S.; Biala, K. Evaluation of the Livestock Sector's Contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGELS); Final Report; European Commission, Joint Research Centre: Ispra, Italy, 2010.
11. Bockisch, F.J.; Ahlgrimm, H.J.; Böhme, H.; Bramm, A.; Dämmgen, U.; Flachowsky, G.; Heinemeyer, O.; Höppner, F.; Murphy, D.P.L.; Rogasik, J.; et al. Assessment of types of organic and conventional farming under consideration of energy use and emissions (in German). Landbauf. Völkenrode 2000, SH 211, 206.
12. Williams, A.G.; Audsley, E.; Sanders, D.L. Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities; Main Report; Defra Research Project IS0205; Defra, Cranfield University: Bedford, UK, 2006.
13. Fritsche, R.; Eberle, U. Greenhouse Gas Emissions During Production and Processing of Food (in German); Working Document; Öko-Institut e.V.: Darmstadt, Germany, 2007.
14. Hirschfeld, J.; Weiß, J.; Precht, M.; Korbun, T. Climate Effects of Agriculture in Germany (in German); Schriftenreihe des IÖW 186/08: Berlin, Germnay, 2008.
15. Grünberg, J.; Nieberg, H.; Schmidt, T. Carbon Footprints of Food; A Critical Reflection (in German). Landbauforsch. vTI Agric. For. Res. 2010, 60, 53-72.
16. IDF (International Dairy Federation). A common carbon footprint approach for dairy-The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 2010, 445, IDF No. 445/2010.
17. Flachowsky, G. Carbon-footprints for food of animal origin, reduction potentials and research need. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2011, 39, 2-14.
18. Woitowicz, A. Consequences of Reduction of Consumption of Food of Animal Origin on Selected Indicators of Sustainability-Demonstrated by Conventional and Organic Farming (in German). Ph.D. Thesis, TU München, München, Germany, 2007.
19. Cederberg, C.; Flysjö, A. Life Cycle Inventory of 23 Dairy Farms in South-Western Sweden; SIK Rapport 728; SIK: Goeteborg, Sweden, 2004.
20. Van der Zijpp, I.A.J. Animal Production Systems: On Integration and Diversity. Habilitation Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2001.
21. GEMIS. Global Emissions-Model of Integrated Systems (in German); Version 4.7; 2010. Available online: http://www.oeko.de/service/gemis (accessed on 14 February 2012).
22. Cederberg, C.; Mattsson, B. Life cycle assessment of milk production-A comparison of conventional and organic farming. J. Clean. Prod. 2000, 8, 250-260.
23. Lindenthal, T.; Markut, T.; Hörtenhuber, S.; Rudolph, G.; Hanz, K. Climate advantages once more demonstrated: Climate balance of organic products (in German). Ökologischer Landbau 2010, 153, 51-53.
24. PAS (Publicly Available Specification) 2050. Scenario Building to Test and Inform the Development of a BSI Method for Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Food; ADAS Report; Project No: YAW3408; Defra, Cranfield University: Bedford, UK, 2011.
25. Haas, G.; Wetterich, F.; Köpke, U. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in Southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 83, 43-53.
26. Thomassen, M.A.; van Calker, K.J.; Smits, M.C.J.; Iepema, G.L.; de Boer, I.J.M. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric. Syst. 2007, 93, 95-107.
27. Plassmann, K.; Edwards-Jones, G. Where does the Carbon Footprint Fall? Development a Carbon Map of Food Production; Sustainable Markets Discussion; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2009.
28. Flachowsky, G. Greenhouse gases and resource efficiency. Aspects of production of food of animal origin (in German). Ernährungsumschau 2008, 55, 414-419.
29. Daemmgen, U.; Haenel, H.D. Emissions of greenhouse gases and gaseous air pollutants-A challenge for animal nutrition. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 2008, 17, 163-167.
30. Basset-Mens, C.; Ledgard, S.; Boyes, M. Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1615-1625.
31. Ledgard, S.; Finalyson, J.; Patterson, M.; Carran, R.; Wedderburn, M. Effects of Intensification of Dairy Farming System in New Zealand on Whole-System Resource Use Efficiency and Environmental Emissions. In Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector; DIAS Report; In Proceedings from the 4th International Conference, Bygholm, Denmark, 6-8 October 2003; pp. 226-229.
32. Zehetmeier, M.; Bandracco, J.; Hoffmann, H.; Heißenhuber, A. Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach. Animal 2011, 6, 154-166.
33. Cederberg, C.; Sonesson, U.; Henriksson, M.; Sund, V.; Davis, J. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Swedish Production of Meat, Milk and Eggs 1990 and 2005; The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology: Gothenburg, Sweden, 2009.
34. Verge, X.P.C.; Dyer, J.A.; Desjardidins, R.L.; Worth, D. Greenhouse-gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001. Agric. Syst. 2007, 94, 683-693.
35. Phetteplace, H.; Johnson, D.; Seidl, A. Greenhouse-gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2001, 60, 99-102.
36. Casey, J.W.; Holden, N.M. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agric. Syst. 2005, 86, 97-114.
37. Peters, G.M.; Rowley, H.S.; Wiedemann, S.; Tucker, R.; Short, M.D.; Schulz, M. Red meat production in Australia: Life cycle assessment and comparisons with overseas studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1327-1332.
38. 2)-footprints of producing food of animal origin-Data basis and reduction potentials (in German). Übers. Tierernährg. 2011, 39, 1-45.
39. Reitmayr, T. Development of a computerized data system for economical and ecological assessment of agricultural systems (in German). Agrarwirtsch. Frankfurt/Main 1995, SH 147.
40. Schlich, E.H.; Fleissner, U. The ecology of scale: Assessment of regional energy turnover and comparison with global food. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2005, 10, 219-223.
41. Casey, J.W.; Holden, N.M. Greenhouse gas emission from conventional, agri-environmental scheme and organic Irish Suckler-Beef units. J. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35, 231-239.
42. Subak, S. Global environmental cost of beef production. Environ. Econ. 1999, 30, 79-91.
43. Cederberg, C.; Stadig, M. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2003, 8, 360-356.
44. Casey, J.W.; Holden, N.M. Quantification of GHG emissions from suckler-beef production in Ireland Agric. Syst. 2006a, 90, 79-98.
45. Nguyen, T.L.T.; Hermansen, J.E.; Mogensen, L. Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU. J. Cleaner Prod. 2010, 18, 756-766
46. Ogino, A.; Kaku, K.; Osada, T.; Shimada, K. Environmental of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 72, 2115-2122.
47. Ogino, A.; Orito, H.; Shimada, K.; Hirooka, H. Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow-calf system by the life cycle assessment method. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 78, 424-432.
48. Flysjö, A.; Cederberg, C.; Henriksson, M.; Ledgard, S. How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2011, 16, 420-430.
49. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report; Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Forth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team; Pachauri, R.K., Reisinger, A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
50. Goodland, R.; Anhang, J. Livestock and Climate Change. What if the Key Actors in Climate Change Were Pigs, Chickens and Cows?; Worldwatch Nov./Dec. 2009; Worldwatch Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 10-19.
51. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: 1990-2009; US Environment Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ usinventoryreport.html/ (accessed on 5 August 2011).
52. Plattner, G.K.; Stocker, T.; Midgley, P.; Tignor, M. IPCC Expert Meeting on the Science of Alternative Metrics: Meeting Report; IPCC Working Group: Bern, Switzerland, 2009.
53. Tappeiner, H. The Nutrition of Domestic Animals (in German), 7th ed.; Verlagsbuchhandlung Paul Parey: Berlin, Germany, 1916; p. 93.
54. Kebreab, E.; Johnson, K.A.; Archibeque, S.L.; Pape, D.; Wirth, T. Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 2738-2748.
55. Janssen, P.H. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 160, 1-22.
56. Martin, C.; Morgavi, D.P.; Doreau, M. Methane mitigation in ruminants: From microbe to the farm scale. Animal 2010, 4, 351-365.
57. Bannink, A.; van Schijdel, M.W.; Dijkstra, J. A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emissions for the Dutch National Inventory Report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167, 603-618.
58. Johnson, K.A.; Huyker, M.; Westberg, H.; Lamb, B.; Zimmerman, P. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a SF6 tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 359-362.
59. Makkar, H.P.S.; Vercoe, P.E. Measuring Methane Production from Ruminants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007.
60. Pinares-Patino, C.S.; Clark, H. Reliability of the sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique for methane emission measurements from individual animals: An overview. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 223-229.
61. Place, S.E.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Mitloehner, F.M. Construction and operation of a ventilated hood system for measuring greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions from cattle. Animals 2011, 1, 433-446.
62. Flachowsky, G.; Brade, W. Potentials of reduction of methane emissions in ruminants (in German). Züchtungskunde 2007, 79, 417-465.
63. Tamminga, S.; Bannink, A.; Dijkstra, J.; Zom, R. Feeding Strategies to Reduce Methane Losses in Cattle; Animal Science Group, Wageningen UR: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2007.
64. Place, S.E.; Mitloehner, F.M. Invited review: Contemporary environments issues: A review of the dairy industry's role in the climate change and air quality and the potential of mitigation through improved production efficiency. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 3407-3416.
65. Cooprider, K.L.; Mitloehner, F.M.; Famula, T.R.; Kebreab, E.; Zhao, Y.; van Eenennaam, A.J. Feedlot efficiency implications on greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 2643-2656.
66. Flachowsky, G.; Lebzien, P. Possibilities for reduction of Nitrogen (N) excretion from ruminants and the need for further research-A review. Landbauf. Völkenrode 2006, 56, 19-30.
67. Arriaga, H.; Salcedo, G.; Martinez-Suller, S.; Calsamiglia, S.; Merino, P. Effect of dietary crude protein modification on ammonia and nitrous oxide concentration on a tie-stall dairy barn floor. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 3158-3165.
68. Calsamiglia, S.; Ferret, A.; Reynolds, C.K.; Kristensen, N.B.; van Vuuren, A.M. Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants. Animal 2010, 4, 1184-1196.
69. Schils, R.L.M.; Verhagen, A.; Aarts, H.F.M.; Kuikman, P.J.; Sebek, L.B.J. Effect of improved nitrogen management on greenhouse gas emissions from intensive dairy systems in the Netherlands. Glob. Change Biol. 2006, 12, 382-391.
70. Flechard, C.R.; Ambus, P.; Skiba, U.; Rees, R.M.; Hensen, A.; van Amstel, A.; Pol-van Dasselaar, A.V.; Soussana, J.F.; Jones, M.; Clifton-Brown, J.; et al. Effects of climate and management intensity on nitrous oxide emissions in grassland systems across Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 121, 135-152.
71. Reidy, B.; Webb, J.; Misselbrook, T.H.; Menzi, H.; Luesink, H.H.; Hutchings, N.J.; Eurich-Menden, B.; Döhler, H.; Daemmgen, U. Comparison of models used for national agricultural emission inventories in Europe: Litter based manure systems. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 1632-1640.
72. Daemmgen, U.; Haenel, H.-D.; Roesemann, C.; Brade, W.; Kueller-Lindenlauf, M.; Eurich-Menden, B.; Döhler, H.; Hutchings, N.J. An improved data base for the description of dairy cows in the German agricultural emission model GAS-EM. Landbauforsc. vTI Agric. For. Res. 2010, 60, 87-100.
73. Brunsch, R.; Kraatz, S.; Berg, W.; Rus, C. Calculation of energy efficiency in animal husbandry on the base of energy balances (in German). KTBL Schrift 2008, 463, 115-125.
74. Young, V.R.; Bier, D.M.; Pellett, P.L. A theoretical basis for increasing current estimates of the amino acid requirements in adult man, with experimental support. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1989, 50, 80-92.
75. WHO, FAO and UNU. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition; Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation; World Health Organization Technical Report Series; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007, Volume 935, pp. 1-265.
76. Pillai, R.R.; Kurpad, A.V. Amino Acid Requirements: Quantitative Estimates. In Amino Acids in Human Nutrition and Health; D'Mello, J.P.F., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, CT, USA, and Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 267-290.
77. Souci, S.W.; Fachmann, W.; Kraut, H. Food Composition and Nutrition Tables, 7th ed.; Medpharm: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2008.
78. Keyzer, M.A.; Merbis, M.D.; Pavel, I.F.P.W.; van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A. Diet shifts towards meat and the effects on cereal use: Can we feed the animals in 2030? Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55, 187-202.
79. Waterlow, J.R. The mysteries of nitrogen balance. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1999, 12, 25-54.
80. Jackson, A.A. Protein. In Essentials in Human Nutrition, 3rd ed.; Mann, J., Truswell, S., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 53-72.
81. Rand, W.M.; Pellett, P.L.; Young, V.R. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 109-127.
82. Mialon, M.M.; Martin, C.; Garcia, F.; Menassol, J.B.; Dubroeucq, H.; Veissier, I.; Micol, D. Effects of the forage-to-concentrate ratio in the diet on feeding behaviour in young Blond d'Aquitaine bulls. Animal 2008, 2, 1682-1691.
83. Doreau, M.; van der Werf, H.M.G.; Micol, D.; Dubroeucq, H.; Agabriel, J.; Rochette, Y.; Martin, C. Enteric methane production and greenhouse gases balance of diets differing in concentrate in the fattening phase of a beef cattle production system. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 2518-2528.
84. Flachowsky, G. Efficiency of energy and nutrient use in the production of edible protein of animal origin. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2002, 22, 1-24.
85. Souci, S.W.; Fachmann, W.; Kraut, H. Food Table for the Practise. In The Little Souci-Fachmann-Kraut (in German), 5th ed.; Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Lebensmittelchemie, Freising, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH: Stuttgart, Germany, 2011.
86. GfE (Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie). Energy and Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 6. Recommendations for Energy and Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (in German); DLG-Verlags-GmbH: Frankfurt, Germany, 1995.
87. GfE (Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie). Recommendations for Energy and Nutrient Requirements of Laying Hens and Broilers (in German); DLG-Verlags GmbH: Frankfurt, Germany, 1999; Volume 7.
88. GfE (Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie). Recommendations for Energy and Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle and Heifers (in German); DLG-Verlags GmbH: Frankfurt, Germany, 2001; Volume 8.
89. GfE (Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie). Recommendations for Energy and Nutrient Requirements of Pigs (in German); DLG-Verlags GmbH: Frankfurt, Germany, 2006; Volume 10.
90. Flachowsky, G.; Kamphues, J. Non-conventional feedstuffs (in German). In Proceedings of the Workshop on Unkonventionelle Futtermittel, Braunschweig, Germany, 10-11 April 1996.
91. Kamphues, J.; Flachowsky, G. Animal nutrition-Resources and new challenges (in German). In Procceedings of the Workshop on Tierernährung-Ressourcen and neue Aufgaben, Braunschweig, Germany, 15-16 June 2000.
92. Vandehaar, M.J. Efficiency of nutrient use and relationship to profitability on dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 272-282.
93. 2-footprints for food of animal origin-Present stage and open questions. J. Cons. Protect. Food Saf. 2009, 4, 190-198.
94. Janzen, H.H. What place for livestock on a re-greening earth? Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167, 783-796.