Tests of concepts about different kinds of minds: Predictions about the behavior of computers, robots, and people

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 161-191

  Levin, Daniel T ^a   Killingsworth, Stephen S ^a   Saylor, Megan M ^a   Gordon, Stephen M ^a   Kawamura, Kazuhiko ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTENTIONALITY; MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; FORECASTING;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 84872849489     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2012.697007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arita, A., Hiraki, K., Kanda, T., and, Ishiguro, H. 2005. " Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons. ". In Cognition B49-B57.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
3. Barr, D., and, Keysar, B. 2005. " Mindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. ". In Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others Edited by: Malle, B. F. and Hodges, S. D. 271-283. New York, NY: Guilford.
4. Barrett, J. L., and, Keil, F. C. 1996. Conceptualizing a non-natural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31: 219-247. (Pubitemid 126375679)
5. Birch, S. A. J., and, Bloom, P. 2007. The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychological Science, 18: 382-386.
6. Bloom, P. 1997. Intentionality and word learning. Trends on Cognitive Sciences, 1: 9-12. (Pubitemid 127430755)
7. Brooks, R., and, Meltzoff, A. N. 2005. The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 10: 126-134.
8. Bruce, A., Nourbakhsh, I., and, Simmons, R. The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May. pp. 4138-4142.
9. Butterworth, G., and, Jarrett, N. 1991. What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9: 55-72.
10. Deak, G. O., and, Bauer, P. J. 1996. The dynamics of preschoolers' word choice. Child Development, 67: 740-767.
11. Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., and, Cacioppo, J. T. 2008. Creating social connection through inferential reproduction. Psychological Science, 19: 114-120.
12. Epley, N., Waytz, A., and, Cacioppo, J. T. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114: 864-886.
13. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., and, Flavell, E. R. 1990. Developmental changes in young children's knowledge about the mind. Cognitive Development, 5: 1-27.
14. Gao, T., Newman, G. E., and, Scholl, B. 2009. The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59: 154-179.
15. Gergeley, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., and, Biro, S. 1995. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56: 165-193.
16. Gopnik, A., Slaughter, V., and, Meltzoff, A. 1994. " Changing your views: How understanding visual perception can lead to a new theory of the mind. ". In Origins of an understanding of mind Edited by: Lewis, C. and Mitchell, P. 157-181. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., and, Wegner, D. M. 2007. Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315: 619 (Pubitemid 46214700)
18. Haslam, N. 2006. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10: 252-264. (Pubitemid 44350198)
19. Hood, B. M., Willen, J. D., and, Driver, J. 1998. Adult eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science, 9: 131-134.
20. Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., and, Carey, S. 1998. Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze following in 12-month olds. Developmental Science, 1: 233-238.
21. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., and, Ishiguro, H. A practical experiment with interactive humanoid robots in a human society. Proceedings from Humanoids 2003: Third IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
22. Kuhlmeier, V., Bloom, P., and, Wynn, K. 2005. Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects?. Cognition, 94: 95-103. (Pubitemid 39070426)
23. Lee, S. L., Kiesler, S., Lau, I. Y., and, Chiu, C. Y. Human mental models of humanoid robots. Proceedings from ICRA'05: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
24. Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O., and, German, T. P. 2004. Core mechanisms in "theory of mind". Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 528-533.
25. Levin, D. T. 20XX. Intention and capacity: A dual heuristic framework for visual metaknowledge. Manuscript under review
26. Levin, D. T., and, Beck, M. R. 2004. " Thinking about seeing: Spanning the difference between metacognitive failure and success. ". In Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children Edited by: Levin, D. T. 121-143. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Levin, D. T., Drivdahl, S. B., Momen, N., and, Beck, M. R. 2002. False predictions about the detectability of unexpected visual changes: The role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11: 507-527. (Pubitemid 36009187)
28. Levin, D. T., Saylor, M. M., Varakin, D. A., Gordon, S. M., Kawamura, K., and, Wilkes, D. M. 2006. Thinking about thinking in computers, robots, and people. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Development and Learning, 5: 49
29. Meltzoff, A. N. 1995. Understanding the intentions of others: Reenactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31: 838-850.
30. Minsky, M. 1982. Why people think computers can't. The AI Magazine, 4: 3-15.
31. Moll, H., and, Tomasello, M. 2004. 12- and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. Developmental Science, 7: F1-F9.
32. Morewedge, C. K., Preston, J., and, Wegner, D. M. 2007. Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93: 1-11.
33. Reeves, B., and, Nass, C. 1996. The media equation New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34. Rensink, R. A. 2000. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7: 17-42. (Pubitemid 30353619)
35. Saylor, M. M., Somanader, M., and, Levin, D. T. 20XX. Defying expectations: How do young children deal with hybrids of basic categories? Manuscript under review
36. Searle, J. 1984. Minds, brains, and science Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A. T., and, Woodward, A. L. 1995. " Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. ". In Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate Edited by: Sperber, D., Premack, D. and Premack, A. 44-78. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., and, Watson, J. 2001. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72: 655-684. (Pubitemid 33597392)
39. Wimmer, H., and, Perner, J. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13: 103-128.
40. Winer, G. A., and, Cottrell, J. E. 1996. Does anything leave the eye when we see? Extramission beliefs of children and adults. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5: 137-142.
41. Woodward, A. L. 1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69: 1-34. (Pubitemid 128446652)
42. Woodward, A. L. 2005. " Infants' understanding of the actions involved in joint attention. ". In Advances in child development and behavior Edited by: Kail, R. V. 229-262. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.