False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: The role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 507-527

  Levin, Daniel T ^a   Drivdahl, Sarah B ^a   Momen, Nausheen ^a   Beck, Melissa R ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BLINDNESS; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHENOMENOLOGY; PREDICTION; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036917736     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00020-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Blackmore, S. J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., & Troscianko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24, 1075-1081.
2. Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090.
3. Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288-307.
4. Fischoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (pp. 335-355). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Fischoff, B. (1988). Judgement and decision making. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The Psychology of Human Thought (pp. 153-187). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 324-340.
7. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1995). The development of childrens' knowledge about attentional focus. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 706-712.
8. Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What isn't so: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.
9. Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1-14.
10. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science) (Vol. 2, pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Gutheil, G., & Rosengren, K. S. (1996). A rose by any other name: Preschoolers' understanding of individual identity across name and appearance. British Journal of Psychology, 14, 477-498.
12. Haines, R. F. (1991). A breakdown in simultaneous information processing. In G. Obrecht & L. W. Stark (Eds.), Presbyopia Research: From Molecular Biology to Visual Adaptation. New York: Plenum Press.
13. Hearst, E. (1991). Psychology and nothing. American Scientist, 79, 432-443.
14. Henderson, J. M. (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychological Science, 8(1), 51-55.
15. Hochberg, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Volume 1: Sensory Processes and Perception (pp. 22-1-22-64). New York: Wiley.
16. Intraub, H. (1981). Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 604-610.
17. Justice, E. M., & Weaver-McDougall, R. G. (1989). Adults' knowledge about memory: Awareness and use of memory strategies across tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 214-219.
18. Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partially occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
19. Landauer, T. (1995). The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Levin, D. T. (2002). Change blindness blindness as visual metacognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9, 111-130.
21. Levin, D. T., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S. B., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability. Visual Cognition, 7, 397-412.
22. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
23. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2, 357-380.
24. McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 563-581.
25. Mefferd, R. B., Wieland, B. A., & James, W. E. (1966). Repetitive psychometric measures. Psychological Reports, 18, 3-10.
26. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 100-110.
27. Miller, P. H., & Weiss, M. G. (1982). Children's and adults' knowledge about what variables affect selective attention. Child Development, 53, 543-549.
28. Mitzumatsu, H., & Yokosawa, K. (2000). Effect of background presence and display set size in change detection [abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41, 2223.
29. Nickerson, R. S. (1965). Short-term memory for complex meaningful visual configurations: A demonstration of capacity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 155-160.
30. Noë, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000). Beyond the grand illusion: What change blindness really teaches us about vision. Visual Cognition, 7, 93-106.
31. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
32. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
33. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 247-277.
34. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
35. Schooler, J. W. (2001). Discovering memories in the light of metaconsciousness. The Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 4, 105-136.
36. Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
37. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7(5), 301-305.
38. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267.
39. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
40. Sodian, B., & Schneider, M. (1986). Recall, clustering, and metamemory in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 395-410.
41. Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207-222.
42. Tversky, A. (1973). Encoding processes in recognition and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 275-287.
43. Wechsler, D. (1952). The Range of Human Capacities. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
44. Wells, G. A., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photo-spreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 1-39.
45. Winer, G. A., Cottrell, J. E., Karefilaki, K. D., & Chronister, M. (1996). Conditions affecting beliefs about visual perception among children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 93-115.
46. Winer, G. A., Cottrell, J. E., Karefilaki, K. D., & Gregg, V. R. (1996). Images, words, and questions: Variables that influence beliefs about vision in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 499-525.
47. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153.