Moving through virtual reality without moving?

Cognitive Processing

Volumn 13, Issue 1 SUPPL, 2012, Pages

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a   Sigurdarson, Salvar ^a   Milne, Andrew P ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Nonturner; Point to origin; Spatial cognition; Spatial updating; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL COGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MOTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE;

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MOTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SPACE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84872825449     PISSN: 16124782     EISSN: 16124790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0491-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Avraamides MN, Kelly JW (2008) Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cogn Process 9:93-106. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0188-5
2. Avraamides MN, Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Golledge RG (2004) Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychol Sci 15:403-408. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00692.x
3. Farrell MJ, Robertson IH (1998) Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 24:227-233
4. Gramann K (2012) Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individual differences in reference frame proclivity. Spat Cogn Comput. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2011.589038
5. Gramann K, Muller HJ, Eick EM, Schonebeck B (2005) Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1199-1223
6. Gramann K, Wing S, Jung T-P et al (2012) Switching spatial reference frames for yaw and pitch navigation. Spat Cogn Comput 12:159-194. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2011.645176
7. Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Beall AC et al (1998) Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol Sci 9:293-298. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00058
8. Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Philbeck JW (1999) Human navigation by path integration. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp 125-151
9. Riecke BE (2008) Consistent left-right reversals for visual path integration in virtual reality: more than a failure to update one's heading? Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 17:143-175. doi: 10.1162/pres.17.2.143
10. Riecke BE (2012) Are left-right hemisphere errors in point-to-origin tasks in VR caused by failure to incorporate heading changes? Spat Cogn 2012 conference (accepted full paper), pp 1-20
11. Riecke BE, von der Heyde M, Bülthoff HH (2005) Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 2:183-215. doi: 10.1145/1077399.1077401
12. Riecke BE, Cunningham DW, Bülthoff HH (2007) Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information. Psychol Res 71:298-313. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0085-z
13. Sigurdarson S, Milne AP, Feuereissen D, Riecke BE (2012) Can physical motions prevent disorientation in naturalistic VR? IEEE Virtual Real 2012:31-34. doi: 10.1109/VR.2012.6180874
14. Wiener JM, Mallot HA (2006) Path complexity does not impair visual path integration. Spat Cogn Comput 6:333-346. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0604-3