Sex Differences in Variability in Personality: A Study in Four Samples

Journal of Personality

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 49-60

  Borkenau, Peter ^a   Hřebíčková, Martina ^b   Kuppens, Peter ^c,d   Realo, Anu ^e   Allik, Jüri ^e,f  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^f ESTONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Informant reports; Perceiver effects; Self reports; Sex differences; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; EXTRAVERSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; VERY ELDERLY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXTRAVERSION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; SELF REPORT; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872673627     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00784.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., Esko, T., Pullat, J., & Metspalu, A. (2010). Variance determines self-observer agreement on the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 421-426.
2. Archer, J., & Mehdikhani, M. (2003). Variability among males in sexually selected attributes. Review of General Psychology, 7, 219-236.
3. Arden, R., & Plomin, R. (2006). Sex differences in variance of intelligence across childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 39-48.
4. Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-183.
5. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614.
6. Borkenau, P., Zaltauskas, K., & Leising, D. (2009). More may be better but there may be too much: Optimal trait level and self-enhancement bias. Journal of Personality, 77, 825-858.
7. Chan, M., Rogers, K. H., Parisotto, K. L., & Biesanz, J. S. (2011). Forming first impressions: The role of gender and normative accuracy in personality perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 117-120.
8. Check, E. (2005). Genetics: The X factor. Nature, 434, 266-267.
9. Church, A. T. (2009). Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology. European Journal of Personality, 23, 153-182.
10. Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122.
11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Orlando, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 97-130.
13. Deary, I. J., Thorpe, G., Wilson, V., Starr, J. M., & Whalley, L. J. (2003). Population sex differences in IQ at age 11: The Scottish Mental Survey 1932. Intelligence, 31, 533-542.
14. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.
15. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33-72.
16. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
17. Feingold, A. (1995). The additive effects of differences in central tendency and variability are important in comparisons between groups. American Psychologist, 50, 5-13.
18. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
19. Gülgöz, S. (2002). Five-factor model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 175-196). New York: Kluwer.
20. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hedges, L. V., & Friedman, L. (1993). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A reanalysis of Feingold's results. Review of Educational Research, 63, 94-105.
22. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
23. Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & DeFruyt, F. (1996). NEO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlisten, NEO-PI-R en NEO-FF-I. Handleigin. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
24. Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8, 149-162.
25. Hřebíčková, M. (2002). Internal consistency of the Czech version of the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 46, 521-535.
26. Humphreys, L. G. (1988). Sex differences in variability may be more important than sex differences in means. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 195-196.
27. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
28. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495.
29. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 523-551.
30. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
31. Kenny, D. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 265-280.
32. Kolar, D. W., Funder, D. C., & Colvin, R. C. (1996). Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Personality, 64, 311-337.
33. Lehre, A. C., Lehre, K. P., Laake, P., & Danbolt, N. C. (2008). Greater intrasex phenotype variability in males than in females is a fundamental aspect of the gender differences in humans. Developmental Psychobiology, 51, 198-206.
34. Lodhi, P. H., Deo, S., & Belhekar, V. M. (2002). The five-factor model of personality: Measurement and correlates in the Indian context. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 227-248). New York: Kluwer.
35. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261-270.
36. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., Senin, I. G., etal. (2004). Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 179-201.
37. Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82.
38. Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-PI-R: NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae [NEO Personality Inventory according to Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
39. Piedmont, R. L., Bain, E., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2002). The applicability of the five-factor model in a sub-Saharan culture: The NEO-PI-R in Shona. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 155-173). New York: Kluwer.
40. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2010). HLM7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
42. Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168-182.
43. Vazire, S. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 472-481.
44. Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300.
45. Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202-1216.
46. Vogt, D. S., & Colvin, C. R. (2003). Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgments. Journal of Personality, 71, 267-295.
47. West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-48.
48. Wood, D., & Wortman, J. (2012). Trait means and desirabilities as artifactual and real sources of differential stability of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 80, 665-701.