More may be better but there may be too much: Optimal trait level and self-enhancement bias

Journal of Personality

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 825-858

  Borkenau, Peter ^a   Zaltauskas, Katrin ^a   Leising, Daniel ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; SELF CONCEPT;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SELF CONCEPT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62949182357     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00566.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York : Holt.
2. Allport, G. W. Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, No. 211.
3. Asendorpf, J. B. Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955 966.
4. Borkenau, P. Ostendorf, F. (1989). Descriptive consistency and social desirability in self-and peer reports. European Journal of Personality, 3, 31 45.
5. Borkenau, P. Ostendorf, F. (1992). Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables. European Journal of Personality, 6, 199 214.
6. Colvin, C. R., Block, J. Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152 1162.
7. Costa, P. T. McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Orlando, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Crowne, D. P. Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349 354.
9. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113 126.
10. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74 118.
11. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York : Dryden.
12. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11 17.
13. Ferring, D. Filipp, S.-H. (1996). Messung des Selbstwertgefühls: Befunde zur Reliabilität, Validität und Stabilität der Rosenberg-Skala [Measurement of self-esteem: Reliability, validity, and stability of the Rosenberg scale]. Diagnostica, 42, 284 292.
14. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
15. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319 340.
16. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York : Guilford Press.
17. Kenny, D. A. Xuan, Z. (2007). WinSoReMo software for SRM analyses [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved from
18. Kwan, V. S. Y., John, O. P., Kenny, D. A., Bond, M. H. Robins, R. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94 110.
19. Kwan, V. S. Y., John, O. P., Robins, R. W. Kuang, L. L. (2008). Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: A componential approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1062 1077.
20. Leising, D. (2008, July). The letter-of-recommendation effect in informant-ratings of personality. In D. Leising (Chair), Meaningful discrepancies in personality assessment: Causes and consequences. Symposium conducted at the 14th European Conference on Personality, Tartu, Estonia.
21. Lewinsohn, P. M., Mischel, W., Chaplin, W. Barton, R. (1980). Social competence and depression: The role of illusory self-perception. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 203 212.
22. McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882 888.
23. Musch, J., Brockhaus, R. Broeder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung zweier Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit [An inventory for assessing two factors of socially desirable responding]. Diagnostica, 48, 121 129.
24. Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit : [Language and personality structure: On the validity of the five-factor model of personality] Regensburg, Germany : Roderer.
25. Ostendorf, F. Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-PI-R: NEO- Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae [NEO Personality Inventory according to Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen, Germany : Hogrefe.
26. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598 609.
27. Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 143 165). Heidelberg, Germany : Springer.
28. Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49 69). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
29. Paulhus, D. L. John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025 1060.
30. Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R. Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observers ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582 593.
31. Raskin, R. Hall, C. S. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159 162.
32. Raskin, R. Terry, H. (1988). A principle components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890 902.
33. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
34. Schallberger, U. Venetz, M. (1999). Kurzversionen des MRS-Inventars von Ostendorf (1990) zur Erfassung der fünf "grossen" Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [Short versions of the MRS Inventory by Ostendorf (1990) to assess the "big" five factors of personality]. Zürich, Switzerland : Universität Zürich.
35. Schuetz, A., Marcus, B. Sellin, I. (2004). Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt: Psychometrische Eigenschaften einer Lang- und einer Kurzform des Deutschen NPI [Measuring narcissism as a personality construct: Psychometric properties of a long and of a short version of the German NPI]. Diagnostica, 50, 202 218.
36. Stoeber, J. (1999). Die Soziale Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SES-17): Construction and first evidence on its reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173 177.
37. Stoeber, J., Dette, D. Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 370 389.
38. Watson, D. Humrichouse, J. (2006). Personality development in emerging adulthood: Integrating evidence from self-ratings and spouse ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 959 974.
39. Webster's encyclopedic unabridged dictionary of the English language. (1989). New York: Gramercy books
40. Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
41. Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155 188.