Participants' reflections two and three years after an introductory chemistry course-embedded research experience

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 23-35

  Szteinberg, Gabriela A ^a   Weaver, Gabriela C ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872567842     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c2rp20115a     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R. L. and Lederman N. G., (1998), The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Sci. Educ., 82(4), 417-436.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science, (1990), Science for all Americans. Retrieved 10/05/2009, 2009, from http://www.project2061.org/ publications/sfaa/online/sfaa toc.htm.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science, (1993), Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Ary D., Jacobs L. C. and Razavieh A., (2002), Introduction to Research in Education (6th edn). Belmont, California: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
5. Baker N. and Verran, J., (2004), The future of microbiology laboratory classes - wet, dry or in combination?. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2(4), 338-342. (Pubitemid 39490103)
6. Bandura A., (1977), Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev., 84(2), 191-215.
7. Brown J. S., Collins A., and Duguid P., (1989), Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1176008.
8. Bruck L., Bretz S. and Towns M. H., (2008), Characterizing the Level of Inquiry in the Undergraduate Laboratory. J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 38(1), 52-58.
9. Burgess J., (2011), Phytochemical Antioxidants with Potential Health Benefits in Foods. Retrieved from http://stemedhub.org/resources/173.
10. Freedman M. P., (1997), Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 34(4), 343-357. (Pubitemid 127458966)
11. Gafney L., and Varma-Nelson P., (2007), Evaluating peer-led team learning: A study of long-term effects on former workshop leaders. J. Chem. Educ., 84, 535-539. (Pubitemid 46416137)
12. Glynn S. M., and Koballa T. R. J. (2007), Motivation to learn in college science. In J. Mintzes and W. H. Leonard (ed.), Handbook of college science teaching. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
13. Gosser D., Cracolice M., Kampmeier J., Roth V., Strozak V., and Varma-Nelson P., (2001), Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Hofstein A., and Lunetta V. N., (1982), The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Rev. Educ. Res., 52(2), 201-217.
15. Hofstein A., and Lunetta V. N., (2004), The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci. Educ., 88(1), 28-54. (Pubitemid 38544888)
16. Hofstein A., and Mamlok-Naaman R., (2007), The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac., 8(2), 105-107.
17. Hunter A. B., Laursen S. L. and Seymour E., (2007), Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci. Educ., 91(1), 36-74.
18. Koballa T. R. J., and Glynn S. M., (2007), Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
19. Lederman N. G., (1992), Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 29(4), 331-359.
20. Lopatto D., (2004), Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biol. Educ., 3(4), 270-277. (Pubitemid 40412635)
21. Marton F., (1981), Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr. Sci., 10, 177-200.
22. Matz R. L., Rothman E. D., Krajcik J. S., and Banaszak Holl M. M., (2012), Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 49(5), 659-682.
23. Mayring P., (2000), Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).
24. Miles M. B. and Huberman A. M., (1994), Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Nagda B. A., Gregerman S. R., Jonides J., von Hippel W. and Lerner J. S., (1998), Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Rev. High. Educ., 22(1), 55-72.
26. National Research Council, (1996), National Science Education Standards. Available from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=4962.
27. National Research Council, (2007), Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC.
28. Orgill M., (2007), Phenomenography. In G.M. Bodner and M. Orgill (ed.), Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
29. Partnership for 21st Century Skills, (2009), 21st Century Skills Map - Science. Tucson, AZ. Retrieved from www.21centurys kills.org.
30. Patton M. Q., (2002), Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Roth W.-M., (1994), Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 31(2), 197-223.
32. Russell C. B., and Weaver G. C., (2011), A comparative study of traditional, inquiry-based, and research-based laboratory curricula: impacts on understanding of the nature of science. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac., 12(1), 57-67.
33. Russell S. H., Hancock M. P. and McCullough J., (2007), THE PIPELINE: Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences. Science, 316, 548-549. (Pubitemid 46683127)
34. Sadler T. D., Burgin S., McKinney L., and Ponjuan L., (2010), Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 47(3), 235-256.
35. Scantlebury K., Li Y., and Woodruff S. B., (2011), Evaluation of CASPiE: Final report. Oxford, OH: Miami University.
36. Seymour E., Hunter A. B., Laursen S. L. and DeAntoni T., (2004), Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Sci. Educ., 88(4), 493-534. (Pubitemid 39056835)
37. Slovacek S., Whittinghill J., Flenoury L. and Wiseman D., (2012), Promoting minority success in the sciences: The minority opportunities in research programs at CSULA. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 49(2), 199-217.
38. Starosta W. J., (1988), A National Holiday for Dr King?: Qualitative Content Analysis of Arguments Carried in the Washington Post and New York Times. J. Black Stud., 18(3), 358-378. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2784512.
39. Strauss A., and Corbin J., (1998), Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Szteinberg G. A., (2012), Long-term effects of course-embedded undergraduate research: The CASPiE longitudinal study. Doctoral thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
41. Taraban R. and Blanton R. L., (2008), Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science: The transformation from student to scientist. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
42. Tobin K. G., (1990), Research on science laboratory activities. In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. Sch. Sci. Math., 90, 403-418.
43. Weaver G. C., Russell C. B. and Wink D. J., (2008), Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. Nat. Chem. Biol., 4(10), 577-580.
44. Weaver G. C., Wink D., Varma-Nelson P., Lytle F., Morris R., Fornes W., et al. (2006), Developing a new model to provide first and second-year undergraduates with chemistry research experience: Early findings of the Center for Authentic Science Practice in Education (CASPiE). Chemical Educator, 11, 125-129.