Assessment of weed establishment risk in a changing European climate

Agricultural and Food Science

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 348-360

  Hyvönen, Terho ^a   Luoto, Miska ^b   Uotila, Pertti ^c  

^a PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Arable weed; Climate change; Climate envelope modelling; Global warming

Indexed keywords

AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; CERASTIUM SEMIDECANDRUM; CHENOPODIUM; CHENOPODIUM RUBRUM; FUMARIA; FUMARIA PARVIFLORA; PAPAVER; PAPAVER HYBRIDUM; SINAPIS; SINAPIS ARVENSIS;

EID: 84872530254     PISSN: 14596067     EISSN: 17951895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.23986/afsci.6321     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Araújo, M.B., Cabeza, M., Thuiller, W., Hannah, L. & Williams, P.H. 2004. Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Global Change Biology 10: 1618-26.
2. Araújo, M.B. & Luoto, M. 2007. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 743-753.
3. Bakkenes, M., Alkemade, J.R.M., Ihle, F., Leemans, R. & Latour, J.B. 2002. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology 8: 390-407.
4. Berry, P., Dawson, T., Harrison, P. & Pearson, R.G. 2002. Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic enve-lope of species in Britain and Ireland. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11: 453-462.
5. Clements, D.R. & Ditommaso, A. 2011. Climate change and weed adaptation: can evolution of invasive plants lead to greater ran-ge expansion than forecasted? Weed Research 51: 227-240.
6. Coudun, C., Gégout, J-C., Piedallu, C. & Rameau, J.C. 2006. Soil nutritional factors improve plant species distribution models: an illustration with Acer campestre (L.) in France. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1750-1763.
7. Fielding, A. & Bell, J. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence mod-els. Environmental Conservation 24: 38-49.
8. Glemnitz, M., Radics, L., Hoffmann, J. & Czimber, G. 2006. Weed species richness and species composition of different arable field types - A comparative analysis along a climate gradient from south to north Europe. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protec-tion, Sonderheft 20: 577-586.
9. Hampe, A. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 469-476.
10. Hanf, M. 1983. The Arable Weeds of Europe with Their Seedlings and Seeds. Ludwigshafen, Germany: BASF Aktiengeselleschaft. 494 p.
11. Heikkinen, R.K., Luoto, M., Araújo, M.B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W. & Sykes, M. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic en-velope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 751-777.
12. Holzner, W. & Immonen, R. 1982. Europe: an overview. In: Holzner, W. and Numata, N. (eds.). Biology and ecology of weeds. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague. p. 203-226.
13. Hyvönen, T., Glemnitz, M., Radics, L. & Hoffmann, J. 2011. Impact of climate and land use type on the distribution of Finnish cas-ual arable weeds in Europe. Weed Research 51: 201-208.
14. IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the In-tergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 881 p.
15. Jalas, J. & Suominen, J. (eds.). 1972-1994. Atlas Florae Europaeae. Volume 1 (1972), 2 (1973), 3 (1976), 4 (1979), 5 (1980), 6 (1983), 7 (1986), 8 (1989), 9 (1991), 10 (1994). Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki.
16. Jalas, J., Suominen, J. & Lampinen, R. (eds.). 1996. Atlas Florae Europaeae. Volume 11. Committee for Mapping the Flora of Eu-rope and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki. 310 p.
17. Kriticos, D.J., Yonow, T. & McFadyen, R.E. 2005. The potential distribution of Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed) in relation to cli-mate. Weed Research 45: 246-254.
18. Lahti, T. & Lampinen, R. 1999. From dot maps to bitmaps: Atlas Florae Europaeae goes digital. Acta Botanica Fennica 162: 5-9.
19. Leathwick, J.R., Whitehead, D. & McLeod, M. 1996. Predicting changes in the composition of New Zealand's indigenous forests in response to global warming: a modelling approach. Environmental Software 11: 81-90.
20. Lehmann, A., Overton, J.M. & Leathwick, J.R. 2002. GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecological Modelling 157: 189-207.
21. Luoto, M., Virkkala, R. & Heikkinen, R.K. 2007. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 34-42.
22. Maggini, R., Lehmann, A., Zimmermann, N.E. & Guisan, A. 2006. Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial predic-tion of forest communities. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1729-1749.
23. McDonald, A., Riha, S., DiTommaso, A. & DaGaetano, A. 2009. Climate change and the geography of weed damage: Analysis of U.S. maize systems suggests the potential for significant range transformations. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 130: 131-140.
24. Milberg, P. & Andersson, L. 2006. Evaluating the potential northward spread of two grass weeds in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science 56: 91-95.
25. Mitchell, T.D., Carter, T.R., Jones, P.D., Hulme, M. & New, M.G. 2004. A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly cli-mate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901-2000) and 16 scenarios (2001-2100). Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 55, 1-30.
26. New, M., Lister, D., Hulme, M. & Makin, I. 2002. A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Climate Re-search 21: 1-25.
27. Patterson, D.T. 1995. Weeds in a changing climate. Weed Science 43: 685-701.
28. Pearson, R.G. & Dawson, T.P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate enve-lope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 361-371.
29. Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P. & Liu, C. 2004. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27: 285-298.
30. Pompe, S., Hanspach, J., Badeck, F., Klotz, S., Thuiller, W. & Kühn, I. 2008. Climate and land use change impacts on plant distribu-tions in Germany. Biology Letters 4: 564-567.
31. Potter, K.J.B., Kriticos, D.J., Watt, M.S. & Leriche, A. 2009. The current and future potential distribution of Cytisus scoparius: a weed of pastoral systems, natural ecosystems and plantation forestry. Weed Research 49: 271-282.
32. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D. & West, C.J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distribution 6: 93-107.
33. Root, T.L., Price, J.T., Hall, K.R., Schneider, S.H., Rosenzweig, C. & Pounds, J.A. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild ani-mals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60.
34. Sætersdal, M., Birks, H.J.B. & Peglar, S.M. 1998. Predicting changes in Fennoscandian vascular-plant richness as a result of future climatic change. Journal of Biogeography 25: 111-122.
35. Schroeder, D., Mueller-Schaerer, H. & Stinson, C.S.A. 1993. A European weed survey in 10 major crop systems to identify targets for biological control. Weed Research 33: 449-458.
36. Skov, F. & Svenning, J-C, 2004. Potential impact of climatic change on the distribution of forest herbs in Europe. Ecography 27: 366-380.
37. Stefanescu, C., Herrando, S. & Paramo, F. 2004. Butterfly species richness in the north-west Mediterranean Basin: the role of nat-ural and human-induced factors. Journal of Biogeography 31: 905-915.
38. Thuiller, W. 2003. BIOMOD - optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology 9: 1353-62.
39. Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M.B., Sykes, M.T. & Prentice, I.C. 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Pro-ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 8245-8250.
40. Thuiller, W., Albert, C., Araújo, M.B., Berry, P.M., Cabeza, M., Guisan, A., Hickler, T., Midgley, G.F., Paterson, J., Schurr, F.M., Sykes, M.T. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2008. Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: Future challenges. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9: 137-152.
41. Uotila, P., Lahti, T. & Suominen, J. 2005. Erfahrung über die langjährige Kartierung von Pflanzen: Atlas Florae Europaeae. Hoppea 66: 119-132. (in German).
42. Venier, L.A., Pearce, J., McKee, J.E., McKenney, D.W. & Niemi, G.J. 2004. Climate and satellite derived land cover for predicting breeding bird distribution in the Great Lakes Basin. Journal of Biogeography 31: 315-331.
43. Williams, G.H. 1982. Elsevier's dictionary of weeds of Western Europe.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publish-ing Company. 320 p.