Using Eye and Pen Movements to Study the Writing Process

Translation of Thought to Written Text While Composing: Advancing Theory, Knowledge, Research Methods, Tools, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 315-338

  Alamargot, Denis ^a   Chesnet, David ^a   Caporossi, Gilles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872415990     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203141434     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Ahlsén, E., & Stromqvist, S. (1999). ScriptLog: A tool for logging the writing process and its possible diagnostic use. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. New directions in research and practice (pp. 144-149). Sweden: Department of Linguistics, Goteborg University.
2. Alamargot, D., Caporossi, G., Chesnet, D., & Ros, C. (2011). What makes a skilled writer? Working memory and audience awareness during text composition. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), p. 505-516.
3. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: A new device to study reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 287-299.
5. Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D., & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, L. V. Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 13-29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Ros, C., & Chuy, M. (2005). Rediger un texte procedural a partir de sources: Relations entre l’empan de memoire de travail et l’activite oculaire du scripteur. In D. Alamargot, P. Terrier, & J. M. Cellier (Eds.), Production, comprehension et usages des ecrits techniques au travail (pp. 51-68). Toulouse, France: Octares.
7. Alamargot, D., Leuwers, C., Caporossi, G., Pontart, V., O’Brien-Ramirez, K., Pagan, A., et al. (2011). Eye tracking data during written recall: Clues to subject-verb agreement processing during translation. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. New York: Psychological Press.
8. Alamargot, D., Plane, S., Lambert, E., & Chesnet, D. (2009). Using eye and pen movements to trace the development of writing expertise: Case studies of a seventh, ninth and twelfth grader, graduate student, and professional writer. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 853-888.
9. Alamargot, D., & Quinlan, T. (2005). Le role de la lecture au cours de la redaction a partir de sources. Approche pluridisciplinaire de l’ecriture: convergences et debats. Ecole thematique du CNRS. 4 au 8 juillet 2005. Poitiers, France.
10. Baccino, T., & Pynte, J. (1998). Spatial encoding and referential processing during reading. European Psychologist, 3(1), 51-61.
11. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Li, F., & Whitehead, S. D. (1992). Hand eye coordination during sequential tasks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 337, 331-339.
12. Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., & Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 239-297.
13. Caporossi, G., Alamargot, D., & Chesnet, D. (2004). Using the computer to study the dynamics of handwriting processes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3245, 242-254.
14. Chanquoy, L., & Alamargot, D. (2002). Memoire de travail et redaction de textes: Evolution des modeles et bilan des premiers travaux. L’annee psychologique, 102, 363-398.
15. Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.-N., & Fayol, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 10(5), 513-540.
16. Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.-N., & Fayol, M. (1996). Writing in adults: A real time approach. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 37-43). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
17. Chartel, E., & Vinter, A. (2006). Role des informations visuelles dans la production de lettres cursives chez l’ infant et l’ adulte. L’annee psychologique, 106(1), 43-63.
18. Chartrel, E., & Vinter, A. (2008). The impact of spatio-temporal constraints on cursive letter handwriting in children. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 537-547.
19. Chesnet, D., & Alamargot, D. (2005). Analyse en temps reel des activates oculaires et grapho-motrices du scripteur. Interet du dispositif ‘Eye and pen’. L’annee psychologique, 105(3), 477-520.
20. Chesnet, D., Guillabert F., & Esperet, E. (1994). G-Studio: Un logiciel pour l’etude en temps reel des parametres temporels de la production ecrite. L’annee psychologique, 94, 115-125.
21. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
22. Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1-18.
23. De Jong, W. P., Hulstijn, W., Kosterman, B. J. M., & Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M. (1996). OASIS software and its application in experimental handwriting research. In M. L. Simner, C. G. Leedham, & A. J. W. M. Thomassen (Eds.), Handwriting and drawing research: Basic and applied issues (pp. 429-440). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
24. Dearborn, W. (1906). The psychology of reading. New York: Science Press.
25. Dore-Mazars, K. (1999). Where and when does the what system play a role in eye movement control? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 680-681.
26. Fayol, M. (1997). Des idees au texte. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
27. Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written production. In M. Torrance & G. C. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing. Processing capacity and working memory effects in text production (pp. 13-23). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
28. Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 437-464.
29. Foulin, J.-N. (1995). Pauses et debits: Les indicateurs temporels de la production ecrite. L’annee psychologique, 95(3), 483-504.
30. Foulin, J.-N. (1998). To what extend does pause location predict pause duration in adults’ and children’s writing. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 17(3), 601-620.
31. Goldman Eisler, F. (1958). The predictability of words in context and the length of pauses in speech. Language and Speech, 1, 226-231.
32. Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths and some observation. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 97-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2006). Eye-hand interactions in tracing and drawing tasks. Human Movement Science, 25, 568-585.
34. Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 7-87.
35. Gufoni, V., Fayol, M., & Gombert, J. E. (1994). Aided subsequent reports as a technique of studying written production: The effects of viewing and the length of text. In G. Eigler & T. Jechle (Eds.), Writing: Current trends in European research (pp. 45-53). Freiburg, Germany: Hochschul Verlag.
36. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction of protocol analysis. In P. Mosenthal, S. Walmsley, & L. Tamor (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 206-219). New York: Longman.
39. Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J. F., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Reading, writing and language learning (Vol. 2, pp. 176-240). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Helsen, W., Elliott, D., Starkes, J., & Ricker, K. (2000). Coupling of eye, finger, elbow, and shoulder movements during manual aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(3), 241-248.
41. Heurley, L. (1994). Traitement des textes proceduraux. Etude de psycholinguistique cognitive des processus de production et de comprehension chez des adultes non experts. These de doctorat en psychologie non publiee, Universite de Dijon, Dijon, France.
42. Hyona, J., Lorch, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44-55.
43. Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1998). Eye movements and eye-hand coordination during typing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(6), 153-157.
44. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and.scene perception (pp. 29-53). North Holland, the Netherlands: Elsevier Sciences Publishers.
45. Inhoff, A. W., Topolski, R., & Wang, J. (1992). Saccade programming during short duration fixations: An examination of copytyping, letter detection, and reading. Acta Psychologica, 81(1), 1-21.
46. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 4, 329-354.
47. Katsanis, J., Iacono, W. G., & Harris, M. (1998). Development of oculomotor functioning in preadolescence, adolescence, and adulthood. Psychophysiology, 35(1), 64-72.
48. Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition, 15(3), 256-266.
49. Kelly, L. P. (1987). The influence of syntactic anomalies on the writing processes of a deaf college student. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 161-196). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
50. Kennedy, M. L. (1985). The composing process of students writing from sources. Written Communication, 2, 434-456.
51. Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D., & Pynte, J. (Eds.). (2000). Reading as a perceptual process. North Holland, the Netherlands: Elsevier Sciences Publishers.
52. Largy, P., Cousin, M. P., & Dedeyan, A. (2005). To produce and revise the inflexional morphology of number: On the access to expertise. Psychologie Frangai.se, 50, 339-350.
53. Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (1994). Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes. Behavior Research: Methods, Instruments and Computers, 26, 219-223.
54. Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(2), 113-134.
55. McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299-325.
56. McCutchen, D., Francis, M., & Kerr, S. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 667-676.
57. Miall, R. C., Imamizu, H., & Miyauchi, S. (2000). Activation of the cerebellum in coordinated eye and hand tracking movements: An fMRI study. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 22-33.
58. Miall, R. C., & Tchalenko, J. (2001). The painter’s eye movements. Leonardo, 34(1), 35-40.
59. Millis, K. K., Simon, S., & TenBroek, N. S. (1998). Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition, 26(2), 232-246.
60. O’Reagan, K. (1975). L’utilisation en temps reel d’un petit ordinateur pour dans l’etude des mouvements oculaires pendant la lecture. Informatique et Sciences Humaines, 22, 7-12.
61. Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written production. Memory and Cognition, 30(4), 594-600.
62. Olive, T., & Levy, M. (2002). Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63. Passerault, J.-M. (1991). L’analyse en temps reel de l’activite de resume: Une etude des temps de pause au cours de la “re-mise” en texte. In M. Charolles & A. Petitjean (Eds.), Le resume: aspects linguistiques, psychologiques et didactiques. Bruxelles, Belgium: Klinksieck.
64. Pelz, J. B. (1995). Visual representations in a natural visuo-motor task. Unpublished PhD, University of Rochester, New York.
65. Piolat, A., & Olive, T (2000). Comment etudier le cout et le deroulement de la redaction de textes: la methode de triple tache. Bilan methodologique. L’annee psychologique, 465, 465-502.
66. Piolat, A., & Pelissier, A. (1998). Etude de la redaction de textes: Contraintes theoriques et methodes de recherches. In A. Piolat & A. Pelissier (Eds.), La redaction de textes: Approche cognitive (pp. 225-269). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux & Niestle.
67. Pynte, J., Courrieu, P, & Frenck, C. (1988). Retrieval from verbal memory and motor programming during writing by hand. In P. Boscolo (Ed.), Writing: Trends in European research. Padova, Italy: Upsel Editore.
68. Ransdell, S. E. (1990). Using real-time replay of students’ word processing to understand and promote better writing. Behavior Research: Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22(2), 142-144.
69. Rao, R. P. N., Zelinsky, G., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42, 1447-1463.
70. Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. W. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (pp. 3-22). Amsterdam: North Holland.
71. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
72. Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(5), 734-747.
73. Severinson, E. K., & Kollberg, P. (1994, October). Computer tools for tracing the writing process: From keystroke records to S-notation. Paper presented at the EARLI/ECWC SIG Conference, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
74. Sirc, G., & Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1988). A computer tool for analysing the composing process. Collegiate Microcomputer, 6(2), 155-160.
75. Smyth, M. M., & Silvers, G. (1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 65, 47-64.
76. Spivey, N. N., & King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 7-26.
77. Underwood, G. W. (Ed.). (1999). Eye guidance while reading and while watching dynamic scenes. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sciences Publishers.
78. Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An on-line study. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 99-120). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
79. Van Galen, G. P., Smyth, M. M., Meulenbroek, R. G. L., & Hylkema, H. (1989). The role of short-term memory and the motor buffer in handwriting under visual and nonvisual guidance. In R. Plamondon, C. Y. Suen, & M. L. Simmer (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting (pp. 253-271). Singapore: World Scientific.
80. Van Galen, G. P., & Teulings, H. L. (1983). The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 9-22.
81. Zesiger, P. (1995). Ecrire. Approches cognitive, neuropsychologique et developpementale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.