Multidimensional assessment of pilot blended learning programs: Maximizing program effectiveness based on student and faculty feedback

Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 23-37

  Calderon, Orly ^a   Ginsberg, Amy Patraka ^a   Ciabocchi, Liz ^a  

^a LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Faculty feedback; Outcomes assessment; Program effectiveness; Student feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872363229     PISSN: 19395256     EISSN: 10928235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Davis, H.C., and Fill, K. "Embedding blended learning in a university's teaching culture: Experiences and reflections." British Journal of Educational Technology 38(5): 817-828(September 2007). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00756.x/full
2. Garrison, D.R., and Vaughan, N., Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
3. Quinn, A., Fitch, D., and Youn, E. "Considering construct validity in distance educational research in social work education: Suggestions for a multivariate approach to researching efficacy." Journal of Social Work Education 47(2): 321-336 (Spring/Summer2011).http://cswe.metapress.com/content/?k=quinn+fitch+youn
4. Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., and Fung, T. "Student role adjustment in Online Communities of Inquiry: Model and Instrument Validation." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 61-74 (April 2004). www.sloanconsortium.org/system/files/v8n2_garrison.pdf.
5. Richardson, J.C., and Swan, K. "Examining Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students' Perceived Learning and Satisfaction." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 68-88 (February 2003).
6. Shea, P. "A study of students' sense of learning community in online environments." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(1): 35-44 (February 2006).
7. Okzan, S., and Koseler, R. "Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation." Computers and Education, 53(4): 1285-1296 (December 2009). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiImageURL&_cid=271849&_user=1293675&_pii=S0360131509001584&_check=y&_origin=browse&_zone=rslt_list_item&_coverDate=2009-12-31&wchp=dGLbVBA-zSkzV&md5=f5c9f65ac16942c1761272d181030d23/1-s2.0-S0360131509001584-main.pdf
8. Pombo, L., Loureiro, M.J., and Moreira, A. "Assessing collaborative work in a higher education blended learning context: Strategies and students' perceptions." Educational Media International 47(3): 217-229 (November 2010). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09523987.2010.518814
9. Lopez-Fernandez, O., and Rodriguez-Illera, J.L. "Investigating university students' adaptations to a digital learner course portfolio." Computers and Education 52(3): 608-616 (April 2009). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiImageURL&_cid=271849&_user=1293675&_pii=S0360131508001668&_check=y&_origin=browse&_zone=rslt_list_item&_coverDate=2009-04-30&wchp=dGLbVlt-zSkzS&md5=9416c1a84230110641af8050e1b3aea9/1-s2.0-S0360131508001668-main.pdf
10. Griesbaum, J., and Gortz, M. "Using feedback to enhance collaborative learning: An exploratory study concerning the added value of self-and-peer-assessment by first-year students in a blended learning lecture." International Journal on E-Learning (IJEL) 9(4): 481-503 (October 2010). http://www.editlib.org/p/32313.
11. Hiltz, S.R., Shea, P., and Kim, E. "Using Focus Groups to Study ALN Faculty Motivation." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(1): 107-124 (April 2007).
12. Young, J.R. "'Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction." Chronicle of Higher Education A33 (March 22, 2002). http://chronicle.com/article/Hybrid-Teaching-Seeks-to-End/18487/.
13. Shelton, K. "Does strong faculty support equal consistent course completion?: It has for Dallas Baptist University." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 13(3): 63-66 (October 2009).
14. Niemiec, M., and Otte, G. "An administrator's guide to the whys and hows of blended learning." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 13(1): 19-30 (April 2009). http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v13n1/administrator%E2%80%99s-guide-whys-and-hows-blended-learning
15. Moskal, P. "Dancing with a bear: One university's experience with evaluating blended learning." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 13(1): 65-74 (April 2009). http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v13n1/dancing-bear-one-university%E2%80%99s-experience-evaluating-blended-learning.
16. University of Washington. Instructional Assessment System (IAS) Form X. 1995. www.washington.edu/oea/pdfs.course_eval/FormX.pdf.
17. Moore, J.C. "A synthesis of Sloan-C effective practices." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 13(4): 73-94 (December 2009). http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v13n4/synthesis-sloan-c-effective-practices-december-2009.
18. Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., and Garrett, R., Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States, Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2007.
19. California State University, Chico. Rubric for Online Instruction. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. 2002. http://www.csuchico.edu/celt/roi.
20. Van Duzer, J. Instruction Design Tips for Online Instruction. To be used in conjunction with the Rubric for Online Instruction, 2002. http://www.csuchico.edu/celt/roi/.