An administrator's guide to the whys and hows of blended learning

Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-30

  Niemiec, Mary ^a   Otte, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment and evaluation; Blended learning; Degree completion; Hybrid courses; Institutional change; Sustainability and scalability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957945501     PISSN: 19395256     EISSN: 19395256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Picciano, A. G. Blending with purpose-The multimodal model. Presentation at The Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning, Chicago IL, 2008.
2. Hauptman, A. M. Participation, persistence, and attainment rates: The US standing. International Higher Education 52: Summer 2008. http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number52 /p19_Hauptman.htm Accessed July 25, 2008.
3. Garrison, D. R. & H. Kanuka. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95-105, 2004.
4. Otte, G. (2005). Using blended learning to drive faculty development (and vice versa). In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2005.
5. Young, J.R. 'Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education 3/22/02: A33, 2002.
6. Dziuban, C., J. Hartman, F. Juge, P. Moskal & S. Sorg. Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C.J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2005.
7. Laumakis, M., C. Graham & C. Dziuban. The Sloan-C Pillars: Boundary objects as a framework for evaluating blended learning. Presentation at The Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning, Chicago IL, 2008.