Intrinsically disordered proteins and conformational noise Implications in cancer

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-31

  Mahmoudabadi, Gita ^a   Rajagopalan, Krithika ^b,e   Getzenberg, Robert H ^b   Hannenhalli, Sridhar ^c   Rangarajan, Govindan ^d   Kulkarni, Prakash ^b  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Maryland   (United States)

^d INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^e Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Evolution; Intrinsically disordered proteins; Noise; Protein protein interaction network; State switching

Indexed keywords

INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEIN; PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIGENETICS; GENOTYPE; NEOPLASM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

EID: 84872354783     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.23178     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010; 1804:1231-64; PMID:20117254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap. 2010.01.017.
2. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK. Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept. Annu Rev Biophys 2008; 37:215-46; PMID:18573080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125924.
3. Patil A, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Hub promiscuity in protein-protein interaction networks. Int J Mol Sci 2010; 11:1930-43; PMID:20480050; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11041930.
4. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F, Klitgord N, Cusick ME, Radivojac P, et al. Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2:e100; PMID:16884331; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020100.
5. Gsponer J, Babu MM. The rules of disorder or why disorder rules. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2009; 99:94-103; PMID:19344736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. pbiomolbio.2009.03.001.
6. Taniguchi Y, Choi PJ, Li GW, Chen H, Babu M, Hearn J, et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 2010; 329:533-8; PMID:20671182; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1188308.
7. Munsky B, Neuert G, van Oudenaarden A. Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science 2012; 336:183-7; PMID:22499939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1216379.
8. Ladbury JE, Arold ST. Noise in cellular signaling pathways: causes and effects. Trends Biochem Sci 2012; 37:173-8; PMID:22341496; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.tibs.2012.01.001.
9. Tompa P, Csermely P. The role of structural disorder in the function of RNA and protein chaperones. FASEB J 2004; 18:1169-75; PMID:15284216; http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1584rev.
10. Turoverov KK, Kuznetsova IM, Uversky VN. The protein kingdom extended: ordered and intrinsically disordered proteins, their folding, supramolecular complex formation, and aggregation. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2010; 102:73-84; PMID:20097220; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.01.003.
11. Huang Y, Liu Z. Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding-binding process: a critical assessment of the "fly-casting" mechanism. J Mol Biol 2009; 393:1143-59; PMID:19747922; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.010.
12. Eldar A, Elowitz MB. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 2010; 467:167-73; PMID:20829787; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09326.
13. Sharma SV, Lee DY, Li B, Quinlan MP, Takahashi F, Maheswaran S, et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell 2010; 141:69-80; PMID:20371346; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02. 027.
14. Babu MM, van der Lee R, de Groot NS, Gsponer J. Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011; 21:432-40; PMID:21514144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.011.
15. Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD, van Oudenaarden A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet 2002; 31:69-73; PMID:11967532; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng869.
16. Yamada T, Bork P. Evolution of biomolecular networks: lessons from metabolic and protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:791-803; PMID:19851337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2787.
17. Kar G. Gursoy, Keskin, O. Human cancer protein-protein interaction network: a structural perspective. PloS Comp Biol 2009; 5:e1000601; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000601.
18. Liu J, Perumal NB, Oldfield CJ, Su EW, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Intrinsic disorder in transcription factors. Biochemistry 2006; 45:6873-88; PMID:16734424; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi0602718.
19. Martinez SR, Miranda JL. CTCF terminal segments are unstructured. Protein Sci 2010; 19:1110-6; PMID:20196073; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.367.
20. Wang H, Maurano MT, Qu H, Varley KE, Gertz J, Pauli F, et al. Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation. Genome Res 2012; 22:1680-8; PMID:22955980; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.136101.111.
21. Sandhu KS. Intrinsic disorder explains diverse nuclear roles of chromatin remodeling proteins. J Mol Recognit 2009; 22:1-8; PMID:18802931; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmr.915.
22. Beh LY, Colwell LJ, Francis NJ. A core subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 1 is broadly conserved in function but not primary sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:E1063-71; PMID:22517748; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1118678109.
23. Vavouri T, Semple JI, Garcia-Verdugo R, Lehner B. Intrinsic protein disorder and interaction promiscuity are widely associated with dosage sensitivity. Cell 2009; 138:198-208; PMID:19596244; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2009.04.029.
24. Marcotte EM, Tsechansky M. Disorder, promiscuity, and toxic partnerships. Cell 2009; 138:16-8; PMID:19596229; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06. 024.
25. Gsponer J, Futschik ME, Teichmann SA, Babu MM. Tight regulation of unstructured proteins: from transcript synthesis to protein degradation. Science 2008; 322:1365-8; PMID:19039133; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1163581.
26. Edwards YJ, Lobley AE, Pentony MM, Jones DT. Insights into the regulation of intrinsically disordered proteins in the human proteome by analyzing sequence and gene expression data. Genome Biol 2009; 10:R50; PMID:19432952; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-r50.
27. Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradovic Z, Dunker AK. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. J Mol Biol 2002; 323:573-84; PMID:12381310; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00969-5.
28. Rajagopalan K, Mooney SM, Parekh N, Getzenberg RH, Kulkarni P. A majority of the cancer/testis antigens are intrinsically disordered proteins. J Cell Biochem 2011; 112:3256-67; PMID:21748782; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.23252.
29. Erdos P, Rényi A. On random graphs. Publ Math 1959; 6:290-7.
30. Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999; 286:509-12; PMID:10521342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
31. Jonsson PF, Bates PA. Global topological features of cancer proteins in the human interactome. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:2291-7; PMID:16844706; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl390.
32. Di Domenico T, Walsh I, Martin AJM, Tosatto SCE. MobiDB: a comprehensive database of intrinsic protein disorder annotations. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:2080-1; PMID:22661649; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts327.
33. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F, Klitgord N, Cusick ME, Radivojac P, et al. Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2:e100; PMID:16884331; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020100.
34. Wu G, Feng X, Stein L. A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R53; PMID:20482850; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r53.
35. Xia J, Sun J, Jia P, Zhao Z. Do cancer proteins really interact strongly in the human protein-protein interaction network? Comput Biol Chem 2011; 35:121-5; PMID:21666777; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comp-biolchem.2011.04.005.
36. Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Vespignani A. In Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks. Cambridge University Press (2008).
37. Rodrigues FA, Costa LdaF, Barbieri AL. Resilience of protein-protein interaction networks as determined by their large-scale topological features. Mol Biosyst 2011; 7:1263-9; PMID:21298132; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0mb00256a.
38. Newman MEJ. Assortative mixing in networks. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 89:208701; PMID:12443515; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701.
39. Ellis JD, Barrios-Rodiles M, Colak R, Irimia M, Kim T, Calarco JA, et al. Tissue-specific alternative splicing remodels protein-protein interaction networks. Mol Cell 2012; 46:884-92; PMID:22749401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2012.05.037.
40. Buljan M, Chalancon G, Eustermann S, Wagner GP, Fuxreiter M, Bateman A, et al. Tissue-specific splicing of disordered segments that embed binding motifs rewires protein interaction networks. Mol Cell 2012; 46:871-83; PMID:22749400; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039.
41. Murawska M, Brehm A. CHD chromatin remodelers and the transcription cycle. Transcription 2011; 2:244-53; PMID:22223048; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/ trns.2.6.17840.
42. Fong YW, Inouye C, Yamaguchi T, Cattoglio C, Grubisic I, Tjian R. A DNA repair complex functions as an Oct4/Sox2 coactivator in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2011; 147:120-31; PMID:21962512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.08. 038.