Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 64-71

  Dyverfeldt, Petter ^a   Hope, Michael D ^a   Tseng, Elaine E ^a,b   Saloner, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; magnetic resonance imaging; pressure loss; transvalvular pressure gradient; turbulent kinetic energy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY DILATATION; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TURBULENT FLOW; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872304833     PISSN: 1936878X     EISSN: 18767591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. L. Hatle, B.A. Angelsen, A. Tromsdal Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound Br Heart J 43 1980 284 292
2. J. Ohlsson, B. Wranne Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 7 1986 501 508
3. W.K. Laskey, W.G. Kussmaul Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis Circulation 89 1994 116 121
4. W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, K.R. Karsch Extent, determiants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur Heart J 20 1999 1355 1363
5. P. Gjertsson, K. Caidahl, G. Svensson, I. Wallentin, O. Bech-Hanssen Important pressure recovery in patients with aortic stenosis and high Doppler gradients Am J Cardiol 88 2001 139 144
6. E. Bahlmann, D. Cramariuc, E. Gerdts Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy J Am Coll Cardiol Img 3 2010 555 562
7. S.H. Rahimtoola Determining that aortic valve stenosis is severe: back-to-the-future J Am Coll Cardiol Img 3 2010 563 566
8. C.W. Akins, B. Travis, A.P. Yoganathan Energy loss for evaluating heart valve performance J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136 2008 820 833
9. H. Baumgartner, C.M. Otto Aortic stenosis severity: do we need a new concept? J Am Coll Cardiol 54 2009 1012 1013
10. C. Clark The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis. I Unsteady flow experiments J Biomech 9 1976 567 573
11. W. Voelker, H. Reul, T. Stelzer, A. Schmidt, K.R. Karsch Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model J Am Coll Cardiol 20 1992 1585 1593
12. D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, L.G. Durand Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: a new index based on the energy loss concept Circulation 101 2000 765-1
13. D. Garcia, J.G. Dumesnil, L.G. Durand, L. Kadem, P. Pibarot Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity J Am Coll Cardiol 41 2003 435 442
14. H. Baumgartner, T. Steffenelli, J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer 'Overestimation' of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery J Am Coll Cardiol 33 1999 1655 1661
15. C. Clark Energy losses in flow through stenosed valves J Biomech 12 1979 737 746
16. P. Dyverfeldt, A. Sigfridsson, J.P.E. Kvitting, T. Ebbers Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI Magn Reson Med 56 2006 850 858
17. P. Dyverfeldt, J.P.E. Kvitting, A. Sigfridsson, J. Engvall, A.F. Bolger, T. Ebbers Assessment of fluctuating velocities in disturbed cardiovascular blood flow: in vivo feasibility of generalized phase-contrast MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 28 2008 655-3
18. P. Dyverfeldt, R. Gardhagen, A. Sigfridsson, M. Karlsson, T. Ebbers On MRI turbulence quantification Magn Reson Imaging 27 2009 913 922
19. C.J. Elkins, M.T. Alley, L. Saetran, J.K. Eaton Three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocimetry measurements of turbulence quantities in complex flow Exp Fluids 46 2009 285 296
20. S. Petersson, P. Dyverfeldt, R. Gardhagen, M. Karlsson, T. Ebbers Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow Magn Reson Med 64 2010 1039 1046
21. A. Arzani, P. Dyverfeldt, T. Ebbers, S.C. Shadden In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation Ann Biomed Eng 40 2012 860 870
22. P. Dyverfeldt, J.P.E. Kvitting, C.J. Carlhall Hemodynamic aspects of mitral regurgitation assessed by generalized phase-contrast MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 33 2011 582 588
23. J. Haimerl, A. Freitag-Krikovic, A. Rauch, E. Sauer Quantification of aortic valve area and left ventricular muscle mass in healthy subjects and patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis by MRI Z Kardiol 94 2005 173 181
24. J. Mathieu, J. Scott An Introduction to Turbulent Flow 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
25. J.H. Gao, J.O. Gore Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity Med Phys 18 1991 1045 1051
26. H. Baumgartner, J. Hung, J.B. Bermejo Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice Eur J Echo 10 2009 1 25
27. D.J. Pennel, U.P. Sechtem, C.B. Higgins Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6 2004 727 765
28. L.F. Hiratzka, G.L. Bakris, J.A. Beckman 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/ SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 e27 e129
29. R. van Pelt, H. Nguyen, B. ter Haar Romeny, A. Vilanova Automated segmentation of blood-flow regions in large thoracic arteries using 3Dcine PC-MRI measurements Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7 2012 217 224
30. M.D. VanAuker, M. Chandra, J. Shirani, J.A. Strom Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14 2001 853 862
31. K.E. Richards, D. Deserranno, E. Donal, N.L. Greenberg, J.D. Thomas, M.J. Garcia Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287 2004 H1410 H1416
32. R.M. Nerem, W.A. Seed An in vivo study of aortic flow disturbances Cardiovasc Res 6 1972 1 14
33. H. Nygaard, J.M. Hasenkam, E.M. Pedersen, W.Y. Kim, P.K. Paulsen A new perivascular multi-element pulsed Doppler ultrasound system for in vivo studies of velocity fields and turbulent stresses in large vessels Med Biol Eng Comp 32 1994 55 62
34. K. Isaaz, J.F. Bruntz, A. Da Costa Noninvasive quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic valve disease using online digital computer analysis of Doppler velocity data J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 2003 965 974
35. M.L. Thorne, R.N. Rankin, D.A. Steinman, D.W. Holdsworth In vivo Doppler ultrasound quantification of turbulence intensity using a high-pass frequency filter method Ultrasound Med Biol 36 2010 761 771
36. J.M. Tyszka, D.H. Laidlaw, J.W. Asa, J.M. Silverman Three-dimensional, time-resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 12 2000 321 329
37. T. Ebbers, L. Wigstrom, A.F. Bolger, B. Wranne, M. Karlsson Noninvasive measurement of time-varying three-dimensional relative pressure fields within the human heart J Biomech Eng 124 2002 288 293
38. C. Binter, V. Knobloch, R. Manka, A. Sigfridsson, S. Kozerke Bayesian multipoint velocity encoding for concurrent flow and turbulence mapping Magn Reson Med 2012 Jun 14 10.1002/mrm.24370 [E-pub ahead of print]
39. T. Gu, F.R. Korosec, W.F. Block PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography Am J Neuroradiol 26 2005 743 749
40. A. Sigfridsson, S. Petersson, C.J. Carlhall, T. Ebbers Four-dimensional flow MRI using spiral acquisition Magn Reson Med 68 2012 1065 1073