Half-mile circle

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2276, 2012, Pages 101-109

  Guerra, Erick ^a   Cervero, Robert ^a   Tischler, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; ECONOMICS; FORECASTING; LAND USE; RUNOFF; ZONING;

CATCHMENT AREA; DE FACTO STANDARD; FINANCIAL PLAN; HIGH CAPACITY; HIGH-CAPACITY; LAND USE POLICY; MODEL PREDICTIVE; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; TRANSIT RIDERSHIPS;

PLANNING;

EID: 84872240213     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2276-12     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cervero, R., S. Murphy, C. Ferrell, N. Goguts, Y.-H. Tsai, G. B. Arrington, J. Boroski, J. Smith-Heimer, R. Golem, P. Peninger, E. Nakajima, E. Chui, R. Dunphy, M. Myers, and S. McKay. TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2004.
2. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265-294.
3. Cervero, R. Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 9, 2007, pp. 2068-2085.
4. Cervero, R. Transit-Based Housing in California: Evidence on Ridership Impacts. Transport Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1994, pp. 174-183.
5. Small, K. Urban Transportation Economics. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland, 1992.
6. Wardman, M. A Review of British Evidence on Time and Service Quality Valuations. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2001, pp. 107-128.
7. Cervero, R., and J. Landis. Twenty Years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit System: Land Use and Development Impacts. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1997, pp. 309-333.
8. Hess, D., and T. Almeida. Impact of Proximity to Light Rail Rapid Transit on Station-Area Property Values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Studies, Vol. 44, No. 5-6, 2007, pp. 1041-1068.
9. Lewis-Workman, S., and D. Brod. Measuring the Neighborhood Benefits of Rail Transit Accessibility. In Transportation Research Record 1576, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1997, pp. 147-153.
10. McMillen, D., and J. McDonald. Reaction of House Prices to a New Rapid Transit Line: Chicago's Midway Line, 1983-1999. Real Estate Economics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2004, pp. 463-486.
11. Nelson, A. Transit Stations and Commercial Property Values: A Case Study with Policy and Land-Use Implications. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, pp. 77-93.
12. Voith, R. Changing Capitalization of CBD-Oriented Transportation Systems: Evidence from Philadelphia, 1970-1988. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1993, pp. 361-376.
13. Weinberger, R. R. Light Rail Proximity: Benefit or Detriment in the Case of Santa Clara County, California? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1747, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 2001, pp. 104-113.
14. Baum-Snow, N., and M. Kahn. The Effects of New Public Projects to Expand Urban Rail Transit. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2000, pp. 241-263.
15. Rodríguez, D., and F. Targa. Value of Accessibility to Bogotá's Bus Rapid Transit System. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2004, pp. 587-610.
16. Cervero, R., and C. D. Kang. Bus Rapid Transit Impacts on Land Uses and Land Values in Seoul, Korea. Transport Policy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2011, pp. 102-116.
17. Zhao, F., L.-F. Chow, M.-T. Li, I. Ubaka, and A. Gan. Forecasting Transit Walk Accessibility: Regression Model Alternative to Buffer Method. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1835, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2003, pp. 34-41.
18. Calthorpe, P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream, 3rd ed. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, N. J., 1993.
19. O'Sullivan, S., and J. Morrall. Walking Distances to and from Light-Rail Transit Stations. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1996, pp. 19-26.
20. Kuby, M., A. Barranda, and C. Upchurch. Factors Influencing Light-Rail Station Boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 223-247.
21. Upchurch, C., M. Kuby, M. Zoldak, and A. Barranda. Using GIS to Generate Mutually Exclusive Service Areas Linking Travel On and Off a Network. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004, pp. 23-33.
22. Walters, G., and R. Cervero. Forecasting Transit Demand in a Fast Growing Corridor: The Direct-Ridership Model Approach. Fehr & Peers Associates, Walnut Creek, Calif., 2003. http://www.fehrandpeers.com/fp-lib/public/forecast- td-dirRidershp-approach.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2011. 〈http://www. fehrandpeers.com/fp-lib/public/forecast-td-dirRidershp-approach.pdf〉, 〈http://www.fehrandpeers.com/fp-lib/public/forecast-td-dirRidershp- approach.pdf〉
23. Usvyat, L., L. Meckel, M. DiCarlantonio, and C. Lane. Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2009.
24. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 4, 2006, pp. 475-490.
25. Cervero, R. Alternative Approaches to Modeling the Travel-Demand Impacts of Smart Growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2006, pp. 285-295.
26. Lane, C., M. DiCarlantonio, and L. Usvyat. Sketch Models to Forecast Commuter and Light Rail Ridership: Update to TCRP Report 16. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1986, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2006, pp. 198-210.
27. County Business Patterns. U. S. Census Bureau, Washington, D. C., 2007. 〈http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/download/index.htm〉, 〈http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/download/index.htm〉
28. ESRI Data and Maps (DVD). Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Calif., 2007.
29. Evans, J. Transit Scheduling and Frequency. In TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2004.
30. Cervero, R. Built Environments and Mode Choice: Toward a Normative Framework. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 7, 2002, pp. 265-284.
31. Kolko, J. Making the Most of Transit: Density, Employment Growth, and Ridership Around New Stations. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, Calif., February 2011. http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i= 947. Accessed July 1, 2011. 〈http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i= 947〉, 〈http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=947〉