MP2//DFT calculations of interaction energies between acetaminophen and acetaminophen analogues and the aryl sulfotransferase active site

Computational and Theoretical Chemistry

Volumn 1007, Issue , 2013, Pages 41-47

  DiGiovanni, Katherine M ^a   Katherine Hatstat, A ^a   Rote, Jennifer ^a   Cafiero, Mauricio ^a  

^a RHODES COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetaminophen; DFT; Hydrogen bonds; MP2; Sulfotransferase

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872201472     PISSN: 2210271X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2012.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Katzung B.G. Basic and Clinical Pharamcology 2007, McGraw-Hill, New York. second ed.
2. Krenzelok E.P., Royal M.A. Confusion: acetaminophen dosing changes based on no evidence in adults. Drugs R&D 2012, 12:45-48.
3. Khandelwal N., James L.P., Sanders C., Larson A.M., Lee W.M. Unrecognized acetaminophen toxicity as a cause of indeterminate acute liver failure. Hepatology 2011, 35:567-576.
4. Kumar V., Abbas A.K., Fausto N. Robbins and Coltran pathological basis of Disease 2005, Elsevier, Philadelphia. 7th ed.
5. Thomas G. Medicinal Chemistry: An Introduction 2007, Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester. second ed.
6. Allali-Hassani A., Pan P.W., Dombrovski1 L., Najmanovich R., Tempel W., Dong A., Loppnau P., Martin F., Thonton J., Edwards A.M., Bochkarev A., Plotnikov A.N., Vedadi M., Arrowsmith C.H. Structural and chemical profiling of the human cytosolic sulfotransferases. PLOS Biol. 2007, 5:1063-1078.
7. Lu J.H., Li H.T., Liu M.C., Zhang J.P., Li M., An X.M., Chang W.R. Crystal structure of human sulfotransferase SULT1A3 in complex with dopamine and 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphate. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 335:417-423.
8. Bidwell L.M., McManus M.E., Gaedigk A., Kakuta Y., Negishi M., Pedersen L., Martin J.L. Crystal structure of human catecholamine sulfotransferase. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293:521-530.
9. Zaher H., Buters J.T.M., Ward J.M., Bruno M.K., Lucas A.M., Stern S.T., Cohen S.D., Gonzalez F.J. Preotection against acetaminophen toxicity in CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 double-null mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1998, 152:193-199.
10. Clayton T.A., Baker D., Lindon J.C., Everett J.R., Nicholson J.K. Pharmacometabonomic identification of a significant host-microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human drug metabolism. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:14728-14733.
11. J.M. Sanders, et al. NIH, Publication No. 08-5891, 2008.
12. Senesh G., Bushi D., Neta A., Yodfat O. Compatibility of insulin lispro, aspart, and glulisine with the solo™ micropump, a novel miniature insulin pump. J. Diab. Sci. Technol. 2010, 4:104-110.
13. Head-Gordon M., Pople J.A., Frisch M.J. MP2 energy evaluation by direct methods. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 153:503-506.
14. Chapman E., Ding S., Shultz P.G., Wong C. A potent and highly selective sulfontransferase inhibitor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124:14524-14525.
15. Rath V.L., Verdugo D., Hemmerich S. Sulfotransferase structural biology and inhibitor discovery. Drug. Disc. Today 2004, 9:1003-1011.
16. Lin P., Yang W., Pedersen L.C., Negishi M., Pedersen L.G. Searching for the minimum energy path in the sulfuryl transfer reaction catalyzed by human estrogen sulfotransferase: role of enzyme dynamics. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 2006, 106:2981-2998.
17. Stjernschantz E., Reinen J., Meinl W., George B.J., Glatt H., Vermeulen N.P.E., Oostenbrink C. Comparison of murine and human estrogen sulfotransferase inhibition in vitro and in silico-implications for differences in activity, subunit dimerization and substrate inhibition. Molec. Cell Enocrin. 2010, 317:127-140.
18. King R.S., Ghosh A.A., Wu J. Inhibition of human phenol and estrogen sulfotransferase by certain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Curr. Drug Metab. 2006, 7:745-753.
19. Zhao Y., Truhlar D.G. Density functionals for noncovalent interaction energies of biological importance. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2007, 3:289-300.
20. Jurecka P., Sponer J., Cerny J., Hobza P. Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8:1985-1993.
21. Riley K., Vondrasek J., Hobza P. Performance of the DFT-D method, paired with the PCM implicit solvation model, for the computation of interaction energies of solvated complexes of biological interest. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9:5555-5560.
22. Valdes H., Pluhackova K., Pitonak M., Rezae J., Hobza P. Benchmark database on isolated small peptides containing an aromatic side chain: comparison between wave function and density functional theory methods and empirical force field. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10:2747-2757.
23. J.C. Slater, Quantum Theory of Molecular and Solids. vol. 4: The Self-Contained Field for Molecular and Solids, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974.
24. Vosko S.H., Wilk L., Nusair M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58:1200-1211.
25. Tsuzuki S., Honda K., Uchimaru T., Mikami M., Tanabe K. Origin of attraction and directionality of the π/π interaction: model chemistry calculations of benzene dimer interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 124:104-112.
26. Yu W., Liang L., Lin Z., Ling S., Haranczyk M., Gutowski M. Comparison of some representative density functional theory and wave function theory methods for the studies of amino acids. J. Comp. Chem. 2008, 30:589-600.
27. Guadarrama P., Soto-Castro D., Rodriguez-Otero J. Performance of hybrid functionals in the theoretical treatment of H-bonds: analysis term-by-term. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 2008, 108:229-237.
28. Csontos J., Palermo N.Y., Murphy R.F., Lovas S. Calculation of weakly polar interaction energies in polypeptides using density functional and local Moller-Plesset perturbation theory. J. Comp. Chem. 2008, 29:1344-1352.
29. ArgusLab 4.0.1 Mark A. Thompson Planaria Software LLC, Seattle, WA. http://www.arguslab.com.
30. Hehre W.J., Stewart R.F., Pople J.A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 1. Use of Gaussian expansions of Slater-type atomic orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 51:2657-2664.
31. Binning R.C., Curtiss L.A. Compact contracted basis-sets for 3rd-row atoms - GA-KR. J. Comp. Chem. 1990, 11:1206-1216.
32. McLean A.D., Chandler G.S. Contracted Gaussian-basis sets for molecular calculations. 1. 2nd row atoms, Z=11-18. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72:5639-5648.
33. Raghavachari K., Binkley J.S., Seeger R., Pople J.A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 20. Basis set for correlated wave-functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72:650-654.
34. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02, M.J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.