Public managers as catalysts of knowledge co-production? Investigating knowledge dynamics in local environmental policy

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 27, Issue , 2013, Pages 141-150

  Maiello, Antonella ^a   Viegas, Cláudia V ^b   Frey, Marco ^a   D Ribeiro, José Luis ^c  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Environmental policy; Knowledge co production; Local environmental managers; Public participation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; ITALY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGER; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84872188993     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Ajzen I. Nature and operations of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology 2001, 52:27-58.
2. Armitage D., Marschke M., Plummer R. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18:86-98.
3. Astley W.G. Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly 1985, 30:497-513. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392694.
4. Avritzer L. New public spheres in brazil: local democracy and deliberative politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2006, 30:623-637.
5. Bäckstrand K. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 2004, 3:24-41.
6. Baiocchi G. Participation, activism, and politics: the Porto Alegre experiment and deliberative democratic theory. Politics & Society 2001, 29:43-72.
7. Beck U. Risk Society 1992, SAGE, London.
8. Becker M.C. Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 2004, 13:643-678. http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/4/643.abstract.
9. Benzécri J.P. Histoire e préhistoire de l'analyse des données: L'analyse des correspondances. Le Chaiers de l'Analyse des Données 1977, 2:9-40.
10. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1692-1702.
11. Bingham L.B., Nabatchi T., O'Leary R. The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review 2005, 65:547-558. 10.1111/j. 1540-6210.2005.00482.x.
12. Blackmore C. What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas? A theoretical overview. Environmental Science and Policy 2007, 10:512-525.
13. Blasius J., Thiessen V. Methodological artifacts in measures of political efficacy and trust: a multiple correspondence analysis. Political Analysis 2001, 9:1-20. http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/1/1.abstract.
14. Bogason P., Toonen T.A.J. Introduction: networks in public administration. Public Administration 1998, 76:205-227. 10.1111/1467-9299.00098.
15. Bolasco S. Analisi Multidimensionale dei Dati. Metodi strategie e criteri di interpretazione 1999, Roma, Carocci.
16. Brugnach M., Ingram H. Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science and Policy 2012, 15:60-71.
17. Bulkeley H., Mol A.P.J. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values 2003, 12:143-154.
18. Carson L., Lewanski R. Fostering citizen participation top-down. Journal of Public Participation 2008, 2:72-83.
19. Cohen M.D., Burkhart R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien M., Winter S. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change 1996, 5:653-698. http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/3/653.abstract.
20. Corburn J. Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making improving urban planning for communities at risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2003, 22:420-433.
21. Cornwall A. Spaces for transformation? Reflections on Issues of Power and Difference in Participation in Development 2004, Zed Books, London/New York.
22. Cyert R.M., March J.G. A Behavioral Theory if the Firm 1963, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Denhardt R.B., Denhardt J.V. The new public service: serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review 2000, 60:549-559. 10.1111/0033-3352.00117.
24. Edelenbos J., vanBuuren A., vanSchie N. Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in dutch water management projects. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:675-684.
25. Epstein S. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge 1996, University of California, Berkley, USA.
26. Feldman D.L., Ingram H.M. Making science useful to decision makers: climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. American Meteorological Society 2009, 1:9-21.
27. Feldman M.S., Khademian A.M. The role of the public manager in inclusion: creating communities of participation. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 2007, 20:305-324.
28. Feldman M.S., Khademian A.M., Ingram H., Schneider A.S. Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices. Public Administration Review 2006, 66:89-99.
29. Feldman M.S., Pentland B.T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Qaurterly 2003, 48:94-118. http://asq.sagepub.com/content/48/1/94.abstract.
30. Fischer F. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Science 1993, 26:165-187. 10.1007/BF00999715.
31. Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptive governance of socioecological system. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 2005, 30:441-473.
32. Frediani E. L'attività di produzione normativa nella sovranità "per linee orizzontali" 2010, Il Campano, Pisa.
33. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J.R. Science for post normal age. Futures 1993, 25:739-755.
34. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies 1994, SAGE, London.
35. Greenacre M. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis 1984, Academic Press, London.
36. Greenacre M.J. From simple to multiple correspondence analysis. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Method 2006, Chapman and Hall, London. M.J. Greenacre, J. Blasius (Eds.).
37. Gret M., Sintomer Y. Learning Lessons from Better Democracy 2005, Zed Books Ltd., London.
38. Guarino N., Giaretta P. Ontologies and Knowledge Bases Towards a Terminological Clarification, Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases 1995, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
39. Hage M., Petersen A.C., Peter L. Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures 2010, 42:254-264.
40. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968, 162:1243-1248.
41. Hartz-Karp J., Briand M.K. Institutionalising deliberative democracy: theoretical and practical challenges. Australian Parliamentary Review 2009, 24:167-198.
42. Hogg C., Williamson C. Whose interests do lay people represent? towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees. Health Expectations 2001, 4:2-9. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00106.x.
43. Hughes O.E. Public Management and Administration. An Introduction 1994, New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
44. Irwin A., Simmons P., Walker G. Faulty environments and risk reasoning: the local understanding of industrial hazards. Environment and Planning A 1999, 31:1311-1326. URL http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a311311.
45. Jahn T., Bergmann M., Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics 2012, 79:1-10.
46. Jakubik M. Exploring the knowledge landscape: four emerging views of knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management 2007, 11:6-19.
47. Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 2003, 41:223-244. 10.1023/A:1025557512320.
48. Jasanoff S. States of Knwoledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order 2004, Routledge, London.
49. Kerkhoff L.V., Lebel L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 2006, 31:445-477.
50. Khun T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1962, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
51. King C., Stivers C. Government is US: Public Administration in an Anti-government Era 1998, SAGE, Thousands Oaks, CA, USA.
52. Larson K.L., Lach D. Participants and non-participants of place-based groups: an assessment of attitudes and implications for public participation in water resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88:817-830.
53. Latour B. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
54. Lebart L., Morineau A., Warwick K.M. Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis. Correspondence Analysis and Dilated Techniques for Large Matrices 1984, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
55. Lejano R.P., Ingram H. Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. Environmental Science and Policy 2009, 12:653-662.
56. Lindblom C.E., Cohen K.D. Usable Knowledge. Social Science and Social Problem Solving 1979, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
57. Lyotard J.-F. The postmodern condition. The Postmodern Turn. New Perspective in Social Theory 1994, 27-38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. S. Seidman (Ed.).
58. Menegat R. Participatory democracy and sustainable development: integrated urban environmental management in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization 2002, 14:181-206.
59. Nelson R., Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 1982, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
60. Neves, E.M.S.C., 2006. A política ambiental e os municípios brasileiros. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ.
61. Nowotny H., Scott P.M.G. Mode 2 revised: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 2003, 41:179-194.
62. Olsson F., Berkes C., Folke P. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Journal 2004, 34:75-90.
63. Pahl-Wostl C., Sendzimir J., Jeffrey P., Aerts J., Berkamp G., Cross K. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society 2007, 12.
64. Petts J., Brooks C. Expert conceptualization of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decision making: challenges for deliberative democracy. Environment and Planning 2006, 38:1045-1059.
65. Piderit S.K. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: a multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review 2000, 25:783-794. http://www.jstor.org/stable/259206.
66. Pohl C. From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science and Policy 2008, 11:46-53.
67. Polanyi M. Personal knowledge. Meaning 1975, University of Chicago Press, Ch. 2, pp. 22-46.
68. Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis New Public Management, and the Neo-weberian State 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
69. Quick K.S., Feldman M.S. Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2011, 31:1-19.
70. Ravetz J. Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2000, 20:31-64.
71. Repko A.F. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory 2012, SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
72. Roberts N. Public deliberation: an alternative approach to crafting policy and setting direction. Public Administration Review 1997, 57:124-132.
73. Roberts N. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Manager Review 2000, 1.
74. Roux D.J., Stirzaker R.J., Breen C.M., Lefroy E., Cresswell H.P. Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environemental Science and Policy 2010, 13:733-741.
75. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 2005, 30:251-290. http://sth.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/2/251.
76. Schneider A., Ingram H. Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review 1993, 87:334-347. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2939044.
77. Sintomer Y., Allegretti G. I bilanci Participative in Europa 2009, Ediesse S.r.l, Roma.
78. Spender J.C. Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organization 1998, 5:233-256.
79. Stebbins R.A. Exploratory Research in the Social Scientists 2001, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
80. Stokols D., Harvey R., Gress J., Fuqua J., Phillips K. In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration. lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 35:202-213.
81. Storti, G., 2003. Metodologia e tecnica dell'indagine campionaria. Tech. rep., INEA, Roma (IT), Roma.
82. Swyngedouw E. Social Power and the Urbanization of Water 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford, USA.
83. Teddlie C., Yu F. Mixed methods sampling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007, 1:77-100. http://mmr.sagepub.com/content/1/1/77.abstract.
84. Weber E.P., Khademian A.M. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review 2008, 68:334-349.
85. Wynne B. Uncertainty and environmental learning-reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change 1992, 2:111-127.
86. Wynne B. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology 1996, SAGE Publication, Ltd., London. L. Scott, B.W. Bronislaw Szerszynski (Eds.).
87. Wynne B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes, but missing the music?. Public Health 2006, 9:211-220.
88. Yang K. Public administrators' trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review 2005, 65:273-285.
89. Yearley S. Making systematic sense of public discontents with knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study. Public Undesrtanding of Science 2000, 9:105-122.