Distinguishing participation and inclusion

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 272-290

  Quick, Kathryn S ^a   Feldman, Martha S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

community of practice; deliberation; diversity; inclusion; participation; public engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052004383     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X11410979     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Abers R.Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner; 2000:.
2. Agar M. H.Speaking of ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1986:.
3. Agranoff R.Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2007:.
4. Aleshire R. A.Planning and citizen participation: Costs, benefits, and approaches.Urban Affairs Quarterly. 1970;5:369-93.
5. Alinsky S. D.Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. New York: Vintage; 1971:.
6. Allmendinger P.Planning theory. New York: Palgrave; 2002:.
7. Altheide D. L.,Johnson J. M. Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research. Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:485-99.
8. Altschuler A. A.The city planning process: A political analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1965:.
9. Arnstein S.A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Institution of Planners. 1969;35:216-24.
10. Bate S. P.,Robert G.Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: Lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales.Public Administration. 2002;80 (4): 643-63.
11. Beard V. A.Learning radical planning: The power of collective action.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 13-35.
12. Bechky B. A.Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor.Organization Science. 2003;14 (3): 312-30.
13. Bechky B. A.Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations.Organization Science. 2006;17 (1): 3-21.
14. Benhabib S.Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:.
15. Booher D. E.,Innes J. E.Network power in collaborative planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;21:221-36.
16. Bovaird T.Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of services.Public Administration Review. 2007;67 (5): 846-60.
17. Briggs X. S.Doing democracy up close: Culture, power, and communication in community building.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1998;18 (1): 1-13.
18. Briggs X. S.Democracy as problem solving: Civic capacity in communities across the globe. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008:.
19. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Working, learning, and innovation.Organization Science. 1991;2 (1): 40-57.
20. Bryson J. M.What to do when stakeholders matter.Public Management Review. 2004;6 (1): 21-53.
21. Bryson J. M.,Crosby B. C.,Bryson J. K.Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing: The contributions of actor-network theory.International Public Management Journal. 2009;12 (2): 172-207.
22. Butler W. H.,Goldstein B. E.The US fire learning network: Springing a rigidity trap through multi-scalar collaborative networks.Ecology and Society. 2010;15 (3): 21.
23. Carlile P. R.A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development.Organization Science. 2002;13 (4): 442-55.
24. Carron C. G.,Ames K. L.,Kleiman J. D.,Lefever J.Grand Rapids furniture: The story of America's furniture city. Grand Rapids, MI: Public Museum of Grand Rapids; 1998:.
25. Clavel P.The progressive city: Planning and participation, 1969-1984. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1986:.
26. Clavel P.Activists in city hall: The progressive response to the Reagan era in Boston and Chicago. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2010:.
27. Cooke B.,Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. Participation: The new tyranny?. Cooke B.Kothari U., ed. New York: Zed Books; 2004:1-15.
28. Crosby B. C.,Bryson J. M.Leadership for the common good: Tackling problems in a shared-power world. 2005. Leadership for the common good: Tackling problems in a shared-power world. 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005:.
29. Crosby N.,Kelly J. M.,Schaefer P.Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation.Public Administration Review. 1986;46 (2): 170-78.
30. Currie G.,Waring J.,Finn R.The limits of knowledge management for UK public services modernization: The case of patient safety and service quality.Public Administration. 2008;86 (2): 363-85.
31. Czarniawska B.,Joerges B. Travels of ideas. Translating organizational change. Czarniawska B.Sevon G., ed. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter; 1996:13-48.
32. Czarniawska-Joerges B.,Jacobsson B.Budget in a cold climate.Accounting, Organizations, and Society. 1989;14 (1/2): 29-39.
33. Davidoff P.Advocacy and pluralism in planning.Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1965;31 (4): 331-38.
34. Dawes S. S.,Cresswell A. M.,Pardo T. A.From "need to know" to "need to share": Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks.Public Administration Review. 2009;69:392-402.
35. DelliCarpini M. X.,Cook F. L.,Jacobs L. R.Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature.Annual Review of Political Science. 2004;7:315-44.
36. Denhardt R. B.,Denhardt J. V.The new public service: Serving rather than steering.Public Administration Review. 2000;60 (6): 549-59.
37. Denzin N. K.The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978:.
38. Dewey J.The public and its problems. Athens: Ohio University Press; 1927:.
39. Dryzek J. S.Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and science. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
40. Eisenhardt K. M.Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:532-50.
41. Eisenhardt K. M.,Kahwajy J. L.,Bourgeois L. J.How management teams can have a good fight.Harvard Business Review. 1997; (July-August): 77-85.
42. Ely R. J.,Thomas D. A.Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2001;46:229-73.
43. Emerson R. M.,Fretz R. I.,Shaw L. L.Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995:.
44. Evans-Cowley J.,Hollander J.The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools.Planning Practice & Research. 2010;25 (3): 397-408.
45. Feldman M. S.Managing the organization of the future.Public Administration Review. 2010;70 (S1): S159-63.
46. Feldman M. S.,Khademian A. M.Managing for inclusion: Balancing control and participation.International Public Management Journal. 2000;3:149-67.
47. Feldman M. S.,Khademian A. M.To manage is to govern.Public Administration Review. 2002;62 (5): 541-54.
48. Feldman M. S.,Khademian A. M.The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation.Governance. 2007;20:305-24.
49. Feldman M. S.,Khademian A. M.,Ingram H.,Schneider A. S.Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices.Public Administration Review. 2006;66 (S1): 89-99.
50. Feldman M. S.,Khademian A. M.,Quick K. S.Ways of knowing, inclusive management, and promoting democratic engagement: An introduction to the special issue.International Public Management Journal. 2009;12 (2): 123-36.
51. Feldman M. S.,Quick K. S.Generating resources and energizing frameworks through inclusive public management.International Public Management Journal. 2009;12 (2): 137-71.
52. Fischer F.Citizens, experts and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2000:.
53. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Fischer F.Forester J., ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1993:.
54. Fishkin J. S.Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1993:.
55. Fishkin J. S.,Luskin R. C.Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion.Actapolitica. 2005;40 (3): 284-98.
56. Flyvberg B.Rationality and power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
57. Forester J.The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1999:.
58. Friedmann J.Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1987:.
59. Fung A.,Wright E. O.Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York: Verso Books; 2003:.
60. Galston W.Two concepts of liberalism.Ethics. 1995;105:516-34.
61. Garcia D.The gift of all: A community of givers. 2009;:.
62. Gastil J.,Dillard J. P.The aims, methods, and effects of deliberative civic education through the National Issues Forums.Communication Education. 1999;48 (3): 179-92.
63. Geertz C.The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books; 1973:.
64. Glaser B.,Strauss A.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967:.
65. Goldsmith S.,Eggers W. D.Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2004:.
66. Goldstein B. E.,Butler W. H.Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2010;76 (2): 238-49.
67. Goodenough W. H.Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1970:.
68. Grant J. A.The new American social compact: Rights and responsibilities in the twenty-first century. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2008:.
69. GrisezKweit M.,Kweit R. W.Participation, perception of participation, and citizen support.American Politics Research. 2007;35:407-25.
70. Gutmann A.Civic education and social diversity.Ethics. 1995;105:557-79.
71. Gutmann A.,Thompson D. F.Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004:.
72. Habermas J.The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1984:.
73. Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2003. Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Hajer M. A.Wagenaar H., ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
74. Healey P.Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory.Town Planning Review. 1992;63 (2): 143-62.
75. Healey P.Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press; 1997:.
76. Healey P.Collaborative planning in perspective.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (2): 101-23.
77. Healey P.Creativity and urban governance.Policy Studies. 2004;25 (2): 87-102.
78. Holstein J.,Gubrium J.The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:.
79. Innes J. E.,Booher D. E.Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65:412-23.
80. Innes J. E.,Booher D. E.Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Hajer M. A.Wagenaar H., ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 2003:33-59.
81. Innes J. E.,Booher D. E.Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century.Planning Theory and Practice. 2004;5 (4): 419-36.
82. Innes J. E.,Booher D. E.Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York: Routledge; 2010:.
83. Janesick V. J. The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. Handbook of qualitative research. Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:199-219.
84. Kadlecek J. M. "Intergovernmental Cooperation in Metropolitan Grand Rapids, Michigan" (D.P.A. dissertation, Western Michigan University). 1996:.
85. Kenney M.From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and terrorist networks, government bureaucracies, and competitive adaptation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2007:.
86. Kettl D.The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002:.
87. Kirk J.,Miller M. L.Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1986:.
88. Koontz T. M.,Johnson E. M.One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments.Policy Sciences. 2004;37:185-204.
89. Krumholz N.,Clavel P.Reinventing cities: Equity planners tell their stories. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1994:.
90. Krumholz N.,Forester J.Making equity planning work: Leadership in the public sector. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1990:.
91. Kymlicka W.Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995:.
92. LaMore R. L.,Supanich-Goldner F. John Logie and intergovernmental relations in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Governing middle-sized cities: Studies in mayor leadership. Bowers James R.Rich Wilbur C., ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne-Rienner Publishers; 2000:49-64.
93. Langley A.Strategies for theorizing from process data.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:691-710.
94. Lave J.Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988:.
95. Lave J.,Wenger E.Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
96. Lin A. C.Bridging positivist and interpretivist approaches to qualitative methods.Policy Studies Journal. 1998;26:162-80.
97. Locke K.Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001:.
98. Lofland J.,Lofland L.Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1995:.
99. Logan T. H.Almost lost: Building and preserving Heritage Hill, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Traverse City, MI: Arbutus Press;.
100. Lowry K.,Adler P.,Milner N.Participating the public: Group processes, politics, and planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1997;16 (3): 177-87.
101. Mansbridge J. On the idea that participation makes better citizens. Citizen competence and democratic institutions. Elkin S. L.Soltan K. E., ed. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1999:291-325.
102. Mansbridge J.Rethinking representation.American Political Science Review. 2003;97 (4): 515-28.
103. McCoy D. L.,Vincent J. M.Engaging schools in urban revitalization: The Y-Plan (Youth-Plan, Learn, Act, Now!).Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2007;26:389-403.
104. Miller M. L.,van Maanen J."Boats don't fish: People do": Some ethnographic notes on the federal management of fisheries in Gloucester.Human Organization. 1979;38:377-85.
105. Mohr L.Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1982:.
106. Moore M.Creating public value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995:.
107. Moynihan D. P.Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC.American Review of Public Administration. 2003;33:164-88.
108. NabatchiT.Forthcoming. Putting the "public" back in public values research: Designing public participation to identify and respond to public values.
109. Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Nicolini D.Gherardi S.Yanow D., ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2003:.
110. Big ideas in collaborative public management. O'Leary R.Bingham L. B., ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2006:.
111. The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. O'Leary R.Bingham L. B., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009:.
112. Orr J. E.Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1996:.
113. Parekh B. C.Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2002:.
114. Quick K. S. Inclusive public leadership practices: Green stewardship and neighborhood planning in Grand Rapids. PhD diss., Irvine: University of California; 2010:.
115. Rawls J.A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1971:.
116. Reardon K. M.Enhancing the capacity of community-based organizations in East St. Louis.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1998;17:323-33.
117. Reich R. B.The power of public ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998:.
118. Roberts N.Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation.American Review of Public Administration. 2004;34 (4): 315-53.
119. Robinson T. E. "A City within a City: The Social and Economic Construction of Segregated Space in Grand Rapids, Michigan 1945-1975". University of Michigan; 2006:.
120. Sandfort J. R.,Milward H. B. Collaborative service provision in the public sector. The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Cropper S.Ebers M.Huxham C.Smith Ring P., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:147-74.
121. Schneider A.,Ingram H.Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; 1997:.
122. Schweitzer L. A.,Howard E. J.,Doran I.Planners learning and creating power: A community of practice approach.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2008;27:50-60.
123. Selznick P.TVA and the grassroots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1949:.
124. Sewell W. H. Three temporalities: Toward an eventful sociology. The historic turn in the human sciences. McDonald T., ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1996:245-80.
125. Snyder W. M.,Briggs X. S. Communities of practice: A new tool for government managers. Collaboration: Using networks and partnerships. Kamensky J. M.Burlin T. J., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004:171-272.
126. Spradley J.The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1979:.
127. Strauss A.,Corbin J.Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1990:.
128. Taylor M.Public policy in the community: Public policy and politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003:.
129. Thomas R. Taking democracy to scale: Tools for planning at the speed of change. Urban sprawl: A comprehensive reference guide. Doule D. C., ed. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 2006:289-332.
130. Van de Ven A. H.Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note.Strategic Management Journal. 1992;13 (S1): 169-88.
131. Verba S.,Nie N. H.Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987:.
132. Verma N.Pragmatic rationality and planning theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1996;16:5-14.
133. Vigoda E.From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration.Public Administration Review. 2002;62 (5): 527-40.
134. Weeks E. C.The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials.Public Administration Review. 2000;60 (4): 360-72.
135. Wenger E.Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
136. Yankelovich D.Coming to public judgment. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press; 1991:.
137. Yanow D. Seeing organizational learning: A cultural view. Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Nicolini D.Gherardi S.Yanow D., ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2003:32-52.
138. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Yanow D.Schwartz-Shea P., ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2006:.
139. Yin R. K.Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:.
140. Young I. M.Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
141. Zeemering E. S. Grand Rapids: A lack of enthusiasm for change in the council-manager form. More than mayor or manager: Campaigns to change form of government in America's large cities. Svara J. H.Watson D. J., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2010:163-82.