Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 675-684

  Edelenbos, Jurian ^a   van Buuren, Arwin ^a   van Schie, Nienke ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coproduced knowledge; Knowledge coproduction; Network governance; Participation

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79959940466     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arcadis, 2002. Verkennende studie duurzaam waterbeheer Gouwe Wiericke. Rapport 110402/WA2/3J7/000535/001, 14 Augustus 2002.
2. Backstrand K. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 2003, 3(4):24-41.
3. Beinat E., Nijkamp P. Multi-criteria Analysis for Land-use Management 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
4. Bernstein R.J. The New Constellation: The Ethical-political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.
5. de Bruijn J.A., Heuvelhof E.F.ten Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes. Science and Public Policy 1999, 26(3):179-184.
6. Busenberg G.J. Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy. Policy Sciences 1999, 32:1-11.
7. Caswill C., Shove E. Introducing interactive social science. Science and Public Policy 2000, 27(3):154-157.
8. Edelenbos J. Institutional implications of interactive governance: insights from Dutch practice. Governance 2005, 18(1):111-134.
9. Edelenbos J., van Schie N., Gerrits L. Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance. Policy Sciences 2010, 43(1):73-94.
10. Edelenbos J. Water as Connective Current 2010, Boom/Lemma Publishers, The Hague.
11. Ehrmann J.R., Stinson B.L. Joint fact-finding and the use of technical experts. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement 1999, 375-400. Sage, London. L. Susskind, S. McKearnan, J. Thomas-Larmer (Eds.).
12. Eshuis J., Stuiver M. Learning in context through conflict and alignment: farmers and scientists in search of sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 2005, 22(2):137-148.
13. Gallopín G.C., Funtowicz S., O'Connor M., Ravetz J. Science for the twenty-first century: from social contract to the scientific core. International Journal of Social Science 2001, 168(2):219-229.
14. Hajer M., Wagenaar H. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Hoogheemraadschap van Rijnland, 2000. Waterbeheersplan 2000-2004, September 2000.
16. Hoppe R. Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'. Science and Public Policy 1999, 26(3):201-210.
17. Hunt J., Shackley S. Reconceiving science and policy: academic, fiducial and bureaucratic knowledge. Minerva 1999, 37:141-164.
18. Innes J.E., Booher D.E. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 1999, 65:412-423.
19. Irwin A., Simmons P., Walker G. Faulty environments and risk reasoning: the local understanding of industrial hazards. Environment and Planning A 1999, 31:1311-1326.
20. Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch: Advisers as Policy Makers 1990, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
21. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy 1984, Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
22. Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
23. Latour B. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
24. Lindblom C.E., Cohen D.K. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving 1979, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
25. Lintsen H. Two centuries of central water management in the Netherlands. Technology and Culture 2002, 43:549-568.
26. McClean S., Shaw A. From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge: an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research 2005, 15(6):729-749.
27. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty 2002, Polity Press, Cambridge.
28. Petts J. The public-expert interface in local waste management decisions: expertise, credibility, and process. Public Understanding of Science 1997, 6:359-382.
29. Petts J., Brooks C. Expert conceptualizations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decisionmaking: challenges for deliberative democracy. Environment and Planning A 2006, 38:1045-1059.
30. Pielke R.S. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Provincie Zuid-Holland, 2006. Brief Lid Gedeputeerde Staten: Voortgang Gouwe Wiericke West. 1 februari 2006.
32. Raad Landelijk Gebied Achter open deuren. Over de provinciale regierol bij gebiedsontwikkeling 2007, RLG, Utrecht.
33. Ravetz J.R. What is post-normal science. Futures 1999, 31(4):647-653.
34. Rinaudo J.D., Garin P. The benefits of combining lay and expert input for water-management planning at the watershed level. Water Policy 2005, 7:279-293.
35. Royal Haskoning, 2005. MER Integrale inrichting Gouwe Wiericke West. Concept rapport. 10 januari 2005.
36. TNO-NITG, 2000. Uitwerking duurzaam waterbeheer in het herinrichtingsgebied Reeuwijk. Bruisend water als leidraad voor waterberging en dynamisch peilbeheer. TNO-Rapport NITG-00-128-B. Delft.
37. Van Buuren A., Edelenbos J. Conflicting knowledge: why is knowledge production such a problem. Science & Public Policy 2004, 31(4):289-299.
38. Van Buuren, A., 2006. Competent Decision-making. Ph.D. Thesis, Lemma, Utrecht (in Dutch).
39. Van Buuren A. Vermorste kennis en de kwaliteit van publieke wilsvorming. Bestuurskunde 2008, 2008(2):31-40.
40. Van Buuren A. Knowledge for governance, governance of knowledge. Inclusive knowledge management in collaborative governance processes. International Public Management Journal 2009, 12(2):208-235.
41. Van Buuren A., Edelenbos J., Klijn E.H. In woelig water. Water governance op het snijvlak van adapatief waterbeheer en ruimtelijke ontwikkeling 2010, Boom/Lemma Publishers, Den Haag, (in Dutch).
42. Van Schie N., Bouma J.J. The concept of covaluation: institutionalizing the involvement of local (public) values in regional planning on water. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries 2008, 9(4):363-396.
43. Van Schie, N., 2010. Covaluation in Spatial Water Management, PhD thesis, Rotterdam.
44. Woolgar S. Social basis of interactive social science. Science and Public Policy 2000, 27(3):165-173.
45. Wynne B. Knowledge in context: science. Technology, and Human Values 1991, 16:111-121.
46. Yearley S. Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study. Public Understanding of Science 2000, 9:105-122.