The role of skin texture and facial shape in representations of age and identity

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 252-265

  Lai, Michelle ^a   Oruç, Ipek ^a   Barton, Jason J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Face adaptation; Reflectance; Skin; Structure

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGE; AGE DETERMINATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SKIN SURFACE; SKIN TEXTURE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SKIN;

EID: 84872161848     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson N.D., Wilson H.R. The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research 2005, 45(14):1815-1828.
2. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1971, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 279-301.
3. Bahrick H.P., Bahrick P.O., Wittlinger R.P. Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 1975, 104(1):54-75.
4. Bartlett S.P., Grossman R., Whitaker L.A. Age-related changes of the craniofacial skeleton: An anthropometric and histologic analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1992, 90(4):592-600.
5. Barton J.J., Radcliffe N., Cherkasova M.V., Edelman J., Intriligator J.M. Information processing during face recognition: The effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception 2006, 35(8):1089-1105.
6. Behrents R.G. The biological basis for understanding craniofacial growth during adulthood. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 1985, 187:307-319.
7. Behrents R.G. Growth in the Aging Craniofacial Skeleton 1985, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8. Berry D.S., McArthur L.Z. Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin 1986, 100(1):3-18.
9. Bruce V., Langton S. The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception 1994, 23:803-822.
10. Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information. Proceedings, Biological Sciences 1995, 259(1355):137-143.
11. Caharel S., Jiang F., Blanz V., Rossion B. Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information. NeuroImage 2009, 47(4):1809-1818.
12. Calder A., Burton A., Miller P., Young A., Akamatsu S. A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research 2001, 41:1179-1208.
13. Cavina-Pratesi C., Kentridge R.W., Heywood C.A., Milner A.D. Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: Evidence from fMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(10):2319-2332.
14. Cavina-Pratesi C., Kentridge R.W., Heywood C.A., Milner A.D. Separate processing of texture and form in the ventral stream: Evidence from fMRI and visual agnosia. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(2):433-446.
15. Farah M., Tanaka J., Drain H. What causes the face inversion effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21(3):628-634.
16. Fox C.J., Barton J.J.S. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127:80-89.
17. Fox C.J., Oruc I., Barton J.J. It doesn't matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(3):111-113.
18. Galper R.E. Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science 1970, 19:207-208.
19. Galper R.E., Hochberg J. Recognition memory for photographs of faces. American Journal of Psychology 1971, 84(3):351-354.
20. Gosselin F., Schyns P. Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research 2001, 41:2261-2271.
21. Guo X.M., Oruc I., Barton J.J. Cross-orientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: A study using contrast-based recognition thresholds. Vision Research 2009, 49(18):2254-2260.
22. Jeffery L., Rhodes G., Busey T. View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science 2006, 17(6):501-505.
23. Jenkins R., Beaver J.D., Calder A.J. I thought you were looking at me: Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science 2006, 17(6):506-513.
24. Jiang F., Blanz V., O'Toole A.J. Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science 2006, 17(6):493-500.
25. Jiang F., Dricot L., Blanz V., Goebel R., Rossion B. Neural correlates of shape and surface reflectance information in individual faces. Neuroscience 2009, 163(4):1078-1091.
26. Kemp R., Pike G., White P., Musselman A. Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces - the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception 1996, 25:37-52.
27. Kwon Y.H., de Vitoria Lobo N. Age classification from facial images. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1999, 74:1-21.
28. Lai M, Oruc I, and Barton JJ. Facial age after-effects show partial identity invariance and transfer fromhands to faces. Cortex, Dec 11 2010. [Epub ahead of print].
29. Lee K.J., Perrett D. Presentation-time measures of the effects of manipulations in colour space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception 1997, 26(6):733-752.
30. Lee K.J., Perrett D.I. Manipulation of colour and shape information and its consequence upon recognition and best-likeness judgments. Perception 2000, 29(11):1291-1312.
31. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(1):89-94.
32. Malcolm G.L., Lanyon L.J., Fugard A.J., Barton J.J. Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: An exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(8):21-29.
33. O'Toole A., Vetter T., Blanz V. Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: An application of three-dimensional morphing. Vision Research 1999, 39:3145-3155.
34. O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Troje N.F., Bulthoff H.H. Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information. Perception 1997, 26(1):75-84.
35. O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Volz H., Salter E.M. Three-dimensional caricatures of human heads: Distinctiveness and the perception of facial age. Perception 1997, 26(6):719-732.
36. Oruc I., Barton J.J. A novel face aftereffect based on recognition contrast thresholds. Vision Research 2010, 50(18):1845-1854.
37. Oruc I., Guo X.M., Barton J.J. Gender in facial representations: A contrast-based study of adaptation within and between the sexes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(1):e16251.
38. Rossion B. Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 2009, 132(3):300-312.
39. Russell R., Biederman I., Nederhouser M., Sinha P. The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces. Vision Research 2007, 47(2):157-165.
40. Russell R., Sinha P. Real-world face recognition: The importance of surface reflectance properties. Perception 2007, 36(9):1368-1374.
41. Russell R., Sinha P., Biederman I., Nederhouser M. Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception 2006, 35(6):749-759.
42. Schweinberger S.R., Zaske R., Walther C., Golle J., Kovacs G., Wiese H. Young without plastic surgery: Perceptual adaptation to the age of female and male faces. Vision Research 2010, 50(23):2570-2576.
43. Schyns P., Bonnar L., Gosselin F. Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science 2002, 13:402-409.
44. Sergent J., Poncet M. From covert to overt recognition of faces in a prosopagnosic patient. Brain 1990, 113:989-1004.
45. Shepherd J., Davies G., Ellis H. Studies of cue saliency. Perceiving and Remembering Faces 1981, 105-131. Academic Press, London. G. Davies, H. Ellis, J. Shepherd (Eds.).
46. Simpson T. Vision thresholds from psychometric analyses: Alternatives to probit analysis. Optometry and Vision Science 1995, 72:371-377.
47. Smith M.L., Cottrell G.W., Gosselin F., Schyns P.G. Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science 2005, 16(3):184-189.
48. Vetter T., Troje N.F. Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image coding and synthesis. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics Image Science and Vision 1997, 14(9):2152-2161.
49. Vida M.D., Mondloch C.J. Children's representations of facial expression and identity: Identity-contingent expression aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 104(3):326-345.
50. Vuong Q.C., Peissig J.J., Harrison M.C., Tarr M.J. The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and greebles. Vision Research 2005, 45(10):1213-1223.
51. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428(6982):557-561.
52. Yip A.W., Sinha P. Contribution of color to face recognition. Perception 2002, 31(8):995-1003.
53. Zhao L., Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research 2001, 41(23):2979-2994.